2016 Postmortem

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)

25. What difference does it make what kind of election fraud dems think it is, voter suppression is ...

Reply to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #21)

Thu Dec 8, 2016, 01:08 PM

Dec 2016

... election fraud whether we add factors on top of it or just take the voter suppression by face value.

There's OBJECTIVE evidence for attempts at voter suppression before the election.... that's election fraud right?

thx in advance

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Dec 2016 OP

Love the transparency. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #1

I defended Clinton throughout and got many, many hides for it. I AGREE WITH THIS. KittyWampus Dec 2016 #30

More transparency. Thanks. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #31

whatever the f*ck that means. You want to tell me what your comment means? KittyWampus Dec 2016 #36

I added a bit to it. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #39

LOL. this whole election fraud is as dumb on the left as it is on the right. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #2

The agenda: Identify and reduce/eliminate election fraud. noamnety Dec 2016 #4

just because you dont like the results doesn't mean there was fraud. nt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #5

I don't like voter suppression, that is fraud on its face... to dismiss it as a factor is a non star uponit7771 Dec 2016 #11

yes, voter suppression is fraud. but not the type of fraud that the left seems particularly engaged La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #15

What difference does it make? tia uponit7771 Dec 2016 #17

not sure what you mean here. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #21

What difference does it make what kind of election fraud dems think it is, voter suppression is ... uponit7771 Dec 2016 #25

right but by focusing on the theft narrative, we don't see what is happen in the open La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #27

I agree with you on that. noamnety Dec 2016 #12

Yes, so much... focusing on Shitlers tweets and crap isn't going to change anything but making sure uponit7771 Dec 2016 #26

And just because you and I both supported Clinton doesn't mean we can't criticize the FAIL KittyWampus Dec 2016 #32

this is not one of her fails. one of her fails was to go to states that we could never win La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #38

THERE IS NO FRAUD! There is suppression, gerrymandering, and other problems, but... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #20

yup La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #22

Can you understand that this issue noamnety Dec 2016 #28

I never said fraud is impossible... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #41

People have been arrested for election fraud noamnety Dec 2016 #48

Those are FORMS of election fraud... PERIOD... END OF STORY uponit7771 Dec 2016 #29

And not dealt with by recounting that "fraudulent" vote... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #42

Irrelevant on how they're dealt with post election, no one is talking about that. Getting to agree uponit7771 Dec 2016 #44

Voter suppression is a real stretch on "fraud"... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #49

In your example eligble citizens are promised the right to vote no? PREVENTING people from voting or uponit7771 Dec 2016 #50

Well, since recounts aren't happening and can not happen due to systems that are inexcusably KittyWampus Dec 2016 #34

I don't have to prove there is no fraud... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #45

Cause voter suppression was aimed at the right? REALLY?! Factually this is not true, I like reality uponit7771 Dec 2016 #10

i didn't say that. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #14

You intimated such by saying election fraud is dumb, voter suppression is a form of election fraud.. uponit7771 Dec 2016 #16

i have created a few thread now about voter suppresssion La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #24

How to guarantee that fraud doesn't occur and that every vote counts? Sometimes simpler jonno99 Dec 2016 #13

Recounts aren't up to the candidates. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #3

Recounts can be requested by the candidates. noamnety Dec 2016 #7

depends on the state dsc Dec 2016 #8

At least they have random audits in NC. noamnety Dec 2016 #23

And we see how well that went in MI. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #18

If hillary had requested it in Michigan noamnety Dec 2016 #33

YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT!!!%(#)%*@@!! nt JTFrog Dec 2016 #6

Those are words, he "strong position" doesn't mean crap legally... she can still chalenge the result uponit7771 Dec 2016 #9

What? HRC said she would accept election results; she never took stand against verifying them. Justice Dec 2016 #19

I recall her saying a little more than that. noamnety Dec 2016 #35

Yes. I'm a pragmatist too underthematrix Dec 2016 #40

We expected to win. HassleCat Dec 2016 #37

All that is true, but it doesn't change my point. noamnety Dec 2016 #43

Is there a link to what she said? HassleCat Dec 2016 #46

Here's what was said: noamnety Dec 2016 #51

yes, she was too busy being outraged by groupthink and should have nuanced it Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #47

I am going to say it again randr Dec 2016 #52

One of the pervasive myths in this country is that there are free and fair elections. guillaumeb Dec 2016 #53