Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
167. That is not what happened Karynnj. Her book didnt hurt her. It was a blip. What happened
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 08:11 AM
Jul 2016

is she stepped into the 2016 primary and the never ending, absurd attacks began. Clinton is a liar, untrustworthy, no bases to accusations.

It's like sesame street jcgoldie Jul 2016 #1
Because the IWR was just an excuse for Clinton hatred, nothing more. Hoyt Jul 2016 #2
DING! DING! DING! DING! baldguy Jul 2016 #82
Bingo! eom BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #126
Actually, the IWR was a critically important vote and test of judgment & qualifications Martin Eden Jul 2016 #149
No, it was vote to give g war bush leverage to end the Iraq situation. bush misused authorization. Hoyt Jul 2016 #183
Anyone who believed that was a FOOL Martin Eden Jul 2016 #184
They are voting what is in front of them. Bush owns breaking the agreement. Nt seabeyond Jul 2016 #185
Sorry, I disagree, but would love to see some of the links from 2002 that had it all figured out. Hoyt Jul 2016 #187
Are you saying that GW Bush didn't act in good faith? Martin Eden Jul 2016 #188
She made it very clear in her speech that she was not voting for war. KMOD Jul 2016 #204
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #205
rude KMOD Jul 2016 #209
True ... Martin Eden Jul 2016 #222
It's neither of your scenarios. KMOD Jul 2016 #224
If you believe Hillary was telling the truth, then you think she was fooled. Martin Eden Jul 2016 #225
http://www.cfr.org/iraq/remarks-senator-hillary-rodham-clinton-transcript/p6600 KMOD Jul 2016 #231
I was Bok_Tukalo Jul 2016 #226
That depends what is being characterized Martin Eden Jul 2016 #228
...and that is why the Democrats immediately bought full page ads in every national newspaper, bvar22 Jul 2016 #199
Absolutely. And some of us were out protesting before long, too. lostnfound Jul 2016 #200
You nailed it! nt One of the 99 Jul 2016 #154
Thank you! That's it exactly! ~~ Just look at Susan Sarandon ... NurseJackie Jul 2016 #198
Not only her state attacked, 87% of the nation wanted it, two weeks before the 2002 election. seabeyond Jul 2016 #3
It seems Bush doesn't even face the same level of wrath over the IW. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #4
+1! eom BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #47
Yup, insane! obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #148
Oh but the purist circular firing squad did indeed do their thing... whatthehey Jul 2016 #5
there was criticism of Kerry, but no way did in parallel the Clinton hate over the IWR La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #7
Are you kidding? The 2004 primaries were a huge brawl, here. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #61
It was not what was campaigned against him. Or any of the others. Ya, on DU, HUGE brawl, I am sure. seabeyond Jul 2016 #69
If one really wants to dig, my posts are in there, somewhere. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #78
Maybe that is the difference. News obsessed and home 24/7. The impeachment did that seabeyond Jul 2016 #83
I was in Northern California at the time, so no doubt it was a different universe politically. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #117
You are right there. That is when my Repug husband said he would not vote Republican again. seabeyond Jul 2016 #119
Something else. I know in my red and military area, I was using the War and Bush, not Kerry, seabeyond Jul 2016 #87
John Edwards wasn't criticized for his Iraq vote either when he ran in 2008. annavictorious Jul 2016 #106
He was by me. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #116
yes he was, beyond that he was attacked as a phony karynnj Jul 2016 #159
That's the way I remember it, too. Rhiannon12866 Jul 2016 #141
Correct. n/t whathehell Jul 2016 #227
"So, you are good with murdering women and children" Was the consistent comment I received seabeyond Jul 2016 #62
Oh, Lord. If that comment isn't the hallmark of the asshole pretending to be a Democrat, I don't Squinch Jul 2016 #73
I won't do "So's" anymore. Start it with a so statement, and I am so outta there. Lol. Nt seabeyond Jul 2016 #79
Ha! You and me both! Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #118
was there a splintered group that kept up the attacks after the primary like JPR DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #140
God knows. Before my time even lurking. There's no derangement like CDS tho' whatthehey Jul 2016 #169
No, not at all. whathehell Jul 2016 #229
As Hoyt says, with a HUGE clue here: Hortensis Jul 2016 #6
Looks like jcgoldie Jul 2016 #8
yup. she was super popular when she was Secy of State and right after she stepped down La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #9
I wish I could find the article NewJeffCT Jul 2016 #21
That is the way I remember it PatSeg Jul 2016 #36
I think that was the gist of the article NewJeffCT Jul 2016 #40
Also PatSeg Jul 2016 #51
The Gallup poll says that only 13% chose her as most admired... Human101948 Jul 2016 #155
Exactly. Hortensis Jul 2016 #11
So true. sarae Jul 2016 #35
the divergence started before she announced for POTUS AntiBank Jul 2016 #29
Yes, in March and April of 2015. Prior, and I mean just prior, I was seeing polls with her high. seabeyond Jul 2016 #89
Clinton's book and the interviews around it happened then karynnj Jul 2016 #164
That is not what happened Karynnj. Her book didnt hurt her. It was a blip. What happened seabeyond Jul 2016 #167
All those things happened at the same time karynnj Jul 2016 #170
What I do know that I saw, is the attacks were on Obama. Suddenly, enough to draw my attention the seabeyond Jul 2016 #171
Bingo! eom BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #49
I think that is the conclusion we can make. In honesty. I was staying out of politics, not a Clinton seabeyond Jul 2016 #77
Isn't that interesting. I know some think I play it, but women my age LIVE this. We KNOW seabeyond Jul 2016 #63
Well, her campaign is the very definition of "uppity-ness." Some people don't like it when Squinch Jul 2016 #76
Even among Dems, everything is worse when a Clinton does it. I don't know why.... CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #10
women who are viewed as agentic (assertive, ambitious, leader like) are generally La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #12
Well said PatSeg Jul 2016 #37
+1 sarae Jul 2016 #162
Women tend to be likable enough PatSeg Jul 2016 #189
Well said.. whathehell Jul 2016 #230
Thank you PatSeg Jul 2016 #232
You're welcome.. whathehell Jul 2016 #233
part of why her Iraq vote is still in play is Obama hammering her in 2008 AntiBank Jul 2016 #31
But after Kerry, it should be a trivial issue. She's apologized enough. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #34
it still resonates with many people, plus her tenure as SoS did nothing to alleviate the fears that AntiBank Jul 2016 #43
But again, she is no out of line with most elected Dems, yet she gets far more hate. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #68
"it still resonates with many people," No it does not. How do we know? Not a single other policitian seabeyond Jul 2016 #93
Bingo. bettyellen Jul 2016 #176
Obama isn't as critisized DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #128
People swallowed hard and overlooked it bbmykel Jul 2016 #13
But people can't overlook her vote? mcar Jul 2016 #41
That wasn't the choice bbmykel Jul 2016 #109
I was for Obama and that was not the reason. From language, I thought Obama MIGHt, seabeyond Jul 2016 #112
Isn't this facinating? None of the hate holds up to real scrutiny. bettyellen Jul 2016 #177
As far as votes on Iraq. I hold them all in the same regard. NWCorona Jul 2016 #14
Sexism isn't bizarre, it is the norm. WhiteTara Jul 2016 #15
I think you're right on target n/t radical noodle Jul 2016 #19
Good post. Not only held to a higher standard, but with obstacle. This would be the unlevel playing seabeyond Jul 2016 #96
I agree. sarae Jul 2016 #166
I use to. But, five years being on the battlefield I better understand. Now I focus on saying seabeyond Jul 2016 #173
I still hold Kerry, Biden, Edwards accountable bigwillq Jul 2016 #16
But you did vote for Kerry, and for Biden. I did too. And I don't know about you, but Squinch Jul 2016 #80
Yes (nt) bigwillq Jul 2016 #90
Must have been a DU thing. I wasn't here then, and I never heard it once. Squinch Jul 2016 #108
You forget where the nation was on Iraq when Kerry ran. Vattel Jul 2016 #17
It only became unpopular when Hillary ran. nt WhiteTara Jul 2016 #26
No, it was unpopular enough by 2006 that Democrats retook John Poet Jul 2016 #55
Exactly right. It really tanked in 2005 and 2006. Vattel Jul 2016 #113
What? Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #59
were you verbose i your displeasure with them because DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #131
Yes, I was. Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #133
Maybe you were critical but DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #139
it was slowly starting to lose favor in 2004 but not enough to get Kerry elected DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #130
Cough cough woman cough yardwork Jul 2016 #18
He didn't? That was probably the main criticism made against him by Dean supporters during the Chathamization Jul 2016 #20
I disagree. His milittary abilities certainly were that big in the campaign, but seabeyond Jul 2016 #98
It's one reason I voted for Kucinich and not Kerry in 2004. thesquanderer Jul 2016 #22
because living in the middle of the george w. moron* nightmare... Javaman Jul 2016 #23
The internet. People were not as well informed in 2004. Scuba Jul 2016 #24
That was then, this is now. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #25
if so, that is the most inane reason on earth. nt La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #50
Um, no it isn't, actually. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #120
We expected better from her. Demobrat Jul 2016 #27
Obama hammered her on it AntiBank Jul 2016 #28
Perhaps because your premise is questionable at best? bonemachine Jul 2016 #30
no, my question is quite valid. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #48
OK, fine... bonemachine Jul 2016 #52
+1000 Exilednight Jul 2016 #142
+1,000 Vattel Jul 2016 #206
You are viewing her vote of over a decade ago through the prism of this election. Squinch Jul 2016 #85
Excellent point, why do people fail to include the difference. Nt seabeyond Jul 2016 #99
Well when they throw around phrases like women card or race card..... bettyellen Jul 2016 #32
They also claim the rules are different when it comes to the Clintons. JoePhilly Jul 2016 #33
It is bizarre to say the least mcar Jul 2016 #38
The "warmonger" tag was NEVER applied to Kerry, Biden or Edwards. oasis Jul 2016 #39
Yup. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #45
Get real. think Jul 2016 #46
Thanks for posting that. It's unfortunate that there's little interest in the evidence. Chathamization Jul 2016 #107
But who won the primary. Dean or Kerry DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #132
And Clinton won the primary this year. IWR doesn't seem to have hurt her much this year. Chathamization Jul 2016 #134
no what I am saying is that the mood in the country for dems in ' 04 was not anit-war. DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #138
But the mood of the country is never been particularly anti-IWR. Most people don't seem to care. Chathamization Jul 2016 #150
I respectfully disagree DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #156
It didn't seem to be a big problem for McCain in '08. I doubt Trump will get much mileage out of it, Chathamization Jul 2016 #163
no it was a problem DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #180
How quickly people forget. I suppose it being 14 years ago might have something to do with that. arcane1 Jul 2016 #110
"So much good our anti-war votes did" Correct. We got Bush. seabeyond Jul 2016 #115
yes it was 14 years ago but she is facing it while the others are not. Both then and now DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #143
They faced it then and now. arcane1 Jul 2016 #190
Exactly! treestar Jul 2016 #72
Same here. DCBob Jul 2016 #42
Yes, most did. geardaddy Jul 2016 #58
John Kerry isn't a Clinton. George II Jul 2016 #44
Excellent post. Yes. Nt seabeyond Jul 2016 #100
Because they're men. grossproffit Jul 2016 #53
Because, in political time, that was an eternity ago nt broadcaster75201 Jul 2016 #54
So what? So was her vote an eternity ago, then. The question is why did those three men get a pass Squinch Jul 2016 #86
Hillary is female isn't she? rock Jul 2016 #56
In 2004 i bought the noise that we needed the "practical" candidate because 9-11 Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #57
Both Kerry and HRC had unique reasons that people held them responsible - in addition to the fact karynnj Jul 2016 #60
Kerry threw those speeches away when he ran for president against Bush. arcane1 Jul 2016 #81
Kerry is NOT saying that Saddam had weapons of MD there - he is referring to SH's behavior karynnj Jul 2016 #88
Clinton was saying Saddam had WMDs and was a threat, and used it to justify bombing Iraq. arcane1 Jul 2016 #92
Here are Bill's own words: arcane1 Jul 2016 #95
Yes ... and before that bombing the inspectors were asked to leave karynnj Jul 2016 #104
Exactly. 2 presidents, 1 lie, and 0 WMDs n/t arcane1 Jul 2016 #111
GREAT post! Thank you for TRUTH. Those... YvonneCa Jul 2016 #94
I was shocked that Kerry voted for it democrattotheend Jul 2016 #103
+ 1000 n/t MBS Jul 2016 #144
The war wasn't as unpopular back when he ran. Lancero Jul 2016 #64
Or his wealth. JaneyVee Jul 2016 #65
I'm with you on that treestar Jul 2016 #66
The other three are men n/t cosmicone Jul 2016 #67
Yup. Sexism. Squinch Jul 2016 #70
It cost him my vote in 2004. arcane1 Jul 2016 #71
Wow. Yea. Bush. You told them. seabeyond Jul 2016 #102
some of it is lingering bitterness because she was associated with Bill's ericson00 Jul 2016 #74
The Iraq War was raging on. I don't think it was allowed to be part of the campaign narrative. nt Todays_Illusion Jul 2016 #75
Some of us have held the IWR vote against all who voted for it. SheilaT Jul 2016 #84
Penis. nt msanthrope Jul 2016 #91
It reminds me of how Al Gore was excoriated for his vote to confirm Scalia Ellen Forradalom Jul 2016 #97
I remember Kerry and Edwards being criticized a lot for it in 2004 democrattotheend Jul 2016 #101
An the great Irony is many of those folks Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #105
Susan Sarandon didn't make three hundred thousand Florida Democrats vote for Dubya. Scootaloo Jul 2016 #136
First of all Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #178
"Gore = Bush" No difference at all. Kinda like tweedle dee and tweedle dum. Nt seabeyond Jul 2016 #182
"Why" is right. As in "Y chromosome." nt BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #114
Politics are about identity and tribalism. ZombieHorde Jul 2016 #121
In 2003/04 the Iraq war was not as incredibly unpopular as it is now Ash_F Jul 2016 #122
Because Kerry was running against Bush, CanadaexPat Jul 2016 #123
Gee, Kerry/Edwards, both IWR yes voters, failed to win the election. That's wrath. Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #124
Kerry lost because while liberals or progressives were anti war and unafraid of terrorism DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #151
so true DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #125
yes from the posts above I would have had to "prove" if I had posted a thread like this DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #145
Lots of reasons. morningfog Jul 2016 #127
yes the Iraq war had nothing to do with 9/11 attacks DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #174
They all knew it at the time. morningfog Jul 2016 #175
I was as angry with Kerry as I am with Hillary over the IWR vote Thirties Child Jul 2016 #129
Because he was running against its primary architect. Scootaloo Jul 2016 #135
Democrats are also susceptible to propaganda like the general population The Second Stone Jul 2016 #137
Since Oct 2002, in Dem primaries I have refused to support ANYONE who voted for the IWR Martin Eden Jul 2016 #146
Oh, we know why, Pri obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #147
I think people who were for Dean were for Dean because Dean had not voted for the war and merrily Jul 2016 #152
Don't blame anyone but yourself for failing to understand. Exilednight Jul 2016 #153
Over time average voters grew to understand just how bad voting for IWR was. aikoaiko Jul 2016 #157
women, she, her, female get it now? stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #158
Because he never stopped criticizing Bush for how he used IWR Bad Thoughts Jul 2016 #160
" " " " n/t MBS Jul 2016 #168
First of all, he faced plenty of wrath over his vote. MBS Jul 2016 #161
"You may dismiss a vote based on presidential aspirations as one more mark against politicians." Martin Eden Jul 2016 #172
My sentiments exactly! Thanks for posting! nt LAS14 Jul 2016 #165
Haters need to find a reason to hate liberal N proud Jul 2016 #179
They should all wear the same cones of shame... Orsino Jul 2016 #181
And to add, Kerry was our nominee in 2004 Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2016 #186
It is really bizarre - and its called politics CajunBlazer Jul 2016 #191
They are men. nt LexVegas Jul 2016 #192
Yeah, he did. It was a huge deal in 2004. Cal Carpenter Jul 2016 #193
Penis helped. Maru Kitteh Jul 2016 #194
Just go the old DU site and check out why Dean was the frontrunner andym Jul 2016 #195
Yes, I wondered that as well. And how George Stephanopolous ehrnst Jul 2016 #196
Bias requires inconsistent and discordant responses to like things. LanternWaste Jul 2016 #197
Hillary is... Mike Nelson Jul 2016 #201
This time you can say "thanks, Obama" ... surrealAmerican Jul 2016 #202
The right wingnuts haven't been out to get Kerry for several decades like they did the Clinton. Lil Missy Jul 2016 #203
Yup La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #215
Wrong, they have hated him since 1971 karynnj Jul 2016 #217
No, they haven't hounded him repeatedly all those years like they have Hillary and Bill. n/t Lil Missy Jul 2016 #221
Actually they have. It killed his first run for Congress in 1972 karynnj Jul 2016 #223
Plus, mylye2222 Jul 2016 #234
Kerry has bona fides with those in the peace movement so his vote was an error in the context of a Vote2016 Jul 2016 #207
Why are you only just now bringing this up? If it's because you're pissed off that Hill is the... ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #208
lol. You really don't know what you're talking about. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #210
And you really didn't need to make the OP. ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #211
Yes, I did. Clearly many people had things to say about it. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #212
You bringing up Kerry's vote for IWR now is what's silly. ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #213
lol. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #214
Lol. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2016 #216
I vehemently opposed Kerry and supported Dean in the Primary because of the Iraq vote. LostOne4Ever Jul 2016 #218
Do you honestly believe he or Biden received as much flak and name calling La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #219
I don't think that the flak that Hillary has gotten from some of the left LostOne4Ever Jul 2016 #220
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I've never understood why...»Reply #167