2016 Postmortem

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)

69. New Total count: Clinton 2,664,312-53.8% ~ Sanders 2,246,936 -45.3% ~ Difference is 417,376

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 07:45 AM

Jun 2016

Last edited Tue Jun 28, 2016, 08:44 AM - Edit history (4)

reporting as of June 27, 2016, 9:21 p.m.

State wide Uncounted: 586,872 As of 6/27/2016 5:02 p.m

Unprocessed Ballots: http://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/statewide-elections/2016-primary/unprocessed-ballots-report.pdf
and http://vote.sos.ca.gov/unprocessed-ballots-status/

Count reporting as of June 27, 2016: http://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/president/party/democratic/ and

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10RF1oGXLOMSnn3aW_rLgpnZM4wrEsCPDmvf35LjjjaA/edit#gid=0

Just an Update.

HRC #45

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders edging closer to Clinton in slow California vote count [View all] J_J_ Jun 2016 OP

Sad. nt pkdu Jun 2016 #1

not really La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #2

Tulchin would have preferred a process where fewer people voted Renew Deal Jun 2016 #3

It's over..... beachbumbob Jun 2016 #4

It is delayed because some folks didn't want to REGISTER AS DEMOCRATS, but instead choose to still_one Jun 2016 #5

This is so strange. KMOD Jun 2016 #6

What "purpose" does counting all the votes serve? Seriously? nt villager Jun 2016 #28

I was referring to this KMOD Jun 2016 #29

Fair enough, since we agree on the need to count all ballots, in every election villager Jun 2016 #31

At this point it serves absolutely no purpose. HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #35

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #38

What is the purpose then? HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #40

What "purpose" has there ever been to counting *your* vote, then? villager Jun 2016 #44

To find the winner of an election? HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #47

Except, according to you, after a certain point, your vote doesn't need to be counted at all. villager Jun 2016 #48

If we already have an outcome HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #49

Well, you are in great company with Josef Stalin and Antonin Scalia, that's for sure. villager Jun 2016 #50

What you are saying is utterly incoherent. HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #53

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #54

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #55

There are still some close races Retrograde Jun 2016 #46

Sanders needs 86% of all remaining ballots to win California, but even if he gets 100% LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #7

Someone from California election office stated that about 85% of provisionals get counted. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #56

It's changing the narrative.... oh wait, no it's not. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #8

LOL fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #62

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #9

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #10

I dont understand jcgoldie Jun 2016 #11

" this posts has been hidden by a DU Jury" stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #12

People bitching that Ca counts every vote should just stop MattP Jun 2016 #13

OMFG. Not this shit again. nt COLGATE4 Jun 2016 #14

It's already over mathematically onenote Jun 2016 #15

There is still the Sanders math. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #22

Kinda like String Theory versus Loop Quantum Gravity. fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #63

429,000 votes alcibiades_mystery Jun 2016 #16

Why are we stilll fighting a primary that is over? MohRokTah Jun 2016 #17

lots of people running around DU flagging posts these days...the reason? keep hope alive n t msongs Jun 2016 #19

Yeah, I honestly don't understand the rules on this (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #20

No one is contesting that Hillary won CA <--this would be 'fighting the primary all over again' 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #25

The tone & headline of the article give the IMPRESSION of fight the primary over again. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #34

The tone is in the ear of the beholder. n/t 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #42

Spoiler Alert: Bernie Lost Lil Missy Jun 2016 #18

Good one! Thread win! Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #23

Nice one! Vogon_Glory Jun 2016 #27

California's outcome is irrelevant n/t cosmicone Jun 2016 #21

How elections are run and reported is never irrelevant. Tom Rinaldo Jun 2016 #30

Who won is the only thing that matters. HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #37

In one way yes. Tom Rinaldo Jun 2016 #39

How is that comparable? HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #41

I doesn't have to be comparable (and no it's not) Tom Rinaldo Jun 2016 #43

Don't keep fighting the last Democratic presidential primary. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #24

Okay, let's start fighting about the 2020 primaries instead. (just kidding, sort of) floriduck Jun 2016 #33

Give it up, it is over, it is time to go after Trump. redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #26

To your credit, you didn't cite a guy with a bullhorn as your source. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #32

What do you have against bullhorns??? randome Jun 2016 #64

Oh my... lamp_shade Jun 2016 #36

Still harping on CA???? Beacool Jun 2016 #45

Link to the total count as of today. Clinton 2,633,209 53.9% Sanders 2,205,218 45.2% Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #51

New Total count: Clinton 2,664,312-53.8% ~ Sanders 2,246,936 -45.3% ~ Difference is 417,376 Her Sister Jun 2016 #69

Thank you for the update. It is clear from the numbers that this race has been a close one. peace13 Jun 2016 #52

It really wasn't that close of a race MaggieD Jun 2016 #58

Ya know...we have heard this hundreds of time out here. peace13 Jun 2016 #59

If it makes you feel better go for it MaggieD Jun 2016 #60

... peace13 Jun 2016 #68

Same bias as you! Her Sister Jun 2016 #70

8.7 point margin is NOT a close race frazzled Jun 2016 #66

The 'majority' of people like to live on 'two-way-street' as well. eom fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #67

Still rehashing this? MaggieD Jun 2016 #57

Testing the limits? Boredom? (It's all pretty silly, in my opinion.) NurseJackie Jun 2016 #65

I predict in about 8 years or so ??????? might catch up MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #61