2016 Postmortem

ciaobaby

(1,000 posts)

39. Brilliant - I will get right on it.

Reply to leftofcool (Reply #35)

Mon Jun 27, 2016, 05:49 PM

Jun 2016

I just love when you have no reasonable response you still feel it necessary to respond with useless sarcasm.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

80 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HRC just delivered a thorough response to trust ?s about her: [View all] riversedge Jun 2016 OP

A good response! mcar Jun 2016 #1

I respectfully disagree, and invoke the new TOS to not to have to explain myself. insta8er Jun 2016 #2

2nd that sentiment HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #3

3rd that sentiment Vattel Jun 2016 #13

4th that sentiment dirtydickcheney Jun 2016 #48

I disagree with your disagreement mcar Jun 2016 #6

And I 2nd that! tonyt53 Jun 2016 #76

What would you have her say? Maven Jun 2016 #10

I can't say, it would go against the TOS. insta8er Jun 2016 #12

You should trying actually reading the TOS. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #20

That would mean you know what I have on my mind....nice.. insta8er Jun 2016 #22

I had a post hidden for simply pointing out a problem Hillary has. Motown_Johnny Jun 2016 #25

Yep...I want to say more, but technically you are in violation of the TOS by even mentioning this. insta8er Jun 2016 #28

insulating their bubble... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #40

One must remember the golden rule...and who it helps most. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2016 #41

Agreed. Even in a thread about her trust issues..... Motown_Johnny Jun 2016 #24

I have to agree, but going into details would be against the TOS. So I won't do that. insta8er Jun 2016 #26

even if its factual?! tia... The issue is most of them aren't, they're made up shit people stopped uponit7771 Jun 2016 #55

Agree with this mindwalker_i Jun 2016 #27

Nope, not at all. leftofcool Jun 2016 #33

So your "constructive criticism" is she should list her fuck ups and go into detail repeating the bettyellen Jun 2016 #37

Something like that, without the curse words..you know, it is demeaning. But yes lets start with insta8er Jun 2016 #43

And too think that would help her? I don't but it.... But I'm not the one who keeps bettyellen Jun 2016 #50

it probably would do her no good bonemachine Jun 2016 #52

It would be a mistake to veer into mistake territory when the question was about trust. bettyellen Jun 2016 #54

she was the one who brought up her mistakes bonemachine Jun 2016 #60

I think she did fine explaining that she had rethought issues she was mistaken on prior.... bettyellen Jun 2016 #61

What a delicious wine. Darb Jun 2016 #63

Posting privledges before principles! zappaman Jun 2016 #66

Just what I was thinking. Lyric Jun 2016 #80

I respectfully agree, okasha Jun 2016 #4

Yes, good statement, Hillary has been vetted for twenty five years and yet she Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #5

Those who's thinking is programmed by the GOP will, of course, disagree... Bill USA Jun 2016 #7

I wish more people would be thinking. :) insta8er Jun 2016 #9

Thinking Hiraeth Jun 2016 #30

;) LOL insta8er Jun 2016 #36

Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. Good for Hillary. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #8

Nice answer! Her Sister Jun 2016 #11

Hillary just tweeted this about trust. I will put in OP also.... riversedge Jun 2016 #14

I once read a statement by her that was very interesting. Squinch Jun 2016 #15

I remember her saying that. Hope it bodes well for the riversedge Jun 2016 #17

That's a good point democrattotheend Jun 2016 #18

That would suggest that the negative press and sentiment is ginned up. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #29

Cooties. Boys always say we girls have them. Especially if we have beat them on the playground. Squinch Jun 2016 #31

+1 uponit7771 Jun 2016 #56

That's a pretty good explanation democrattotheend Jun 2016 #16

We Dems have permitted the Republicans to direct the Dem conversation far way too long Sheepshank Jun 2016 #19

Very well said DesertRat Jun 2016 #21

Excellent response. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #23

I know what would help me trust her..... ciaobaby Jun 2016 #32

Yes, am sure you would! Her Sister Jun 2016 #34

Write to Goldman Sachs and ask for them leftofcool Jun 2016 #35

Brilliant - I will get right on it. ciaobaby Jun 2016 #39

.. mcar Jun 2016 #46

I trust her after seeing her tax returns and tons of other speeches bettyellen Jun 2016 #38

Ciao Dem2 Jun 2016 #42

Winger bullshit to focus on non binding statements when biding tax returns from tRhmp uponit7771 Jun 2016 #58

No candidate should be able to hide anything since they are R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2016 #65

This is false, I don't want know her shoe sizes... uponit7771 Jun 2016 #68

Nobody is asking for her shoe size or for straw men arguments. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2016 #73

I have spent decades paying attention to her career MaggieD Jun 2016 #44

Yup. ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #51

Introvert KK9 Jun 2016 #45

This introvert agrees mcar Jun 2016 #47

I think you are correct MaggieD Jun 2016 #57

Haven't thought about that in years...that was my result. libdem4life Jun 2016 #62

Interesting take. Darb Jun 2016 #64

No wonder she really needs jrandom421 Jun 2016 #78

Those are all good points DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #49

Very good response. apcalc Jun 2016 #53

K & R Iliyah Jun 2016 #59

I wonder what it will be like to be bushed for last 25 years straight. hertopos Jun 2016 #67

This right here JSup Jun 2016 #77

I trust Hillary Clinton to be true to her record Martin Eden Jun 2016 #69

My issue comes from how active I am in the tech sector, and prepping for a job there. VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #70

They don't contradict one another. randome Jun 2016 #71

In this case, unfortunately, I fear it does VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #72

I don't see how it can be helped, though. randome Jun 2016 #75

I don't have a problem with her concern about the words she uses. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #74

KnR Hekate Jun 2016 #79