Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Fracking. Are you for it or against it? [View all]TheBlackAdder
(28,237 posts)15. Most is for Export--Scheduled to be shipped off-shore via 10 LNG terminals on both coasts.
.
A bunch of people here probably think that this is for domestic consumption, when in reality the plan is to finish construction on 7 more LNG terminals to ship it to Eurasia and Pacific Rim countries. We are mainly effing up our environment for business and to aid in other countries to develop their infrastructures to compete against the US.
Just like how a good share of coal is now for export to emerging countries. We eff up our land for other lands.
.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Against. Also against coal mining (but not expecting it to end immediately)
Alex4Martinez
Jun 2016
#1
Most is for Export--Scheduled to be shipped off-shore via 10 LNG terminals on both coasts.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#15
Links... One of the reasons why the Panama Canal was widened, not just for superships, for US Export
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#30
Dang! Another Panama Canal article. This one ties US exports to the increased production from shale.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#31
with the kind of govt direction of a WWII type energy transformation advocated by Bernie ...
cloudythescribbler
Jun 2016
#3
that 20 years has been too slow -- we need a RAPID WWII type transformation
cloudythescribbler
Jun 2016
#10
how much can be accomplished in 'a few years' is indeed a technical question ...
cloudythescribbler
Jun 2016
#21
these exemptions (like those of Price/Anderson for nuclear) are obscene
cloudythescribbler
Jun 2016
#11
What should a President do if the GOP agreed to fund alternative energy if fracking could continue?
randome
Jun 2016
#14
+1. Unfortunately, such reasoned answers aren't acceptable nowadays. Question to me --Is natural gas
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#32