Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)

3. Ithknk people may be confused by your for or against it

Reply to Snarkoleptic (Original post)

Sat Jun 25, 2016, 03:55 PM

Jun 2016

BEING INcluded in the platform I think you might be getting some for or against the TPP in there.

eta - I have no idea what both the above mean at all???

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TPP are are you for/against it being supported in the final draft of the Democratic Party Platform. [View all] Snarkoleptic Jun 2016 OP

I am very much against this. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2016 #1

For it. We need to keep raising labor and environmental standards. JaneyVee Jun 2016 #2

there are plenty of other good ways to do that. The TPP AntiBank Jun 2016 #9

TTP lowers them AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #13

It's not working TheFarseer Jun 2016 #15

Ithknk people may be confused by your for or against it hollysmom Jun 2016 #3

I've heard the argument that some party officials are either against or neutral on the issue, Snarkoleptic Jun 2016 #11

TPP will lower labor standards. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #4

The convention will not take political swipes at our President. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #5

clarify the question please, you ask should if it should be mentioned AntiBank Jun 2016 #6

Well they voted to support it. TDale313 Jun 2016 #7

I saw a mislabled post that said they endorsed, but that wasn't true AntiBank Jun 2016 #8

You're right. Looking closer, they voted not to oppose it. TDale313 Jun 2016 #10

Uncertain - I suspect this is much more subtle than it looks. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #12

I feel that Obama will sign it during his lame duck session, after HRC is already elected. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #14

tariffs are bad for the economy, however, its not as if there wouldn't be ericson00 Jun 2016 #16