2016 Postmortem

Beacool

(30,253 posts)

92. Wow, talk about delusional sore losers.

Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:10 PM

Jun 2016

Hilary lost by a hair in 2008, but I don't recall all these endless conspiracy theories.

Sanders lost by a large margin. Denying reality is not healthy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

148 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Says Berkeley, Stanford Studies [View all] bkkyosemite Jun 2016 OP

Those odds aren't that bad at all. NWCorona Jun 2016 #1

HRC needs to go out and buy some Powerball tickets. Winning that will be cake to do. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #40

Truth! NWCorona Jun 2016 #50

She already has. She has "won" $150,000,000. That was rigged also. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #141

I am a Senator Sanders supporter... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #2

The reports all over this country cannot just be shoved under the rug of deception. Truth is truth. bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #5

Please, pragmatism is needed moving forward... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #11

there is nothing pragmatic about ignoring election fraud tk2kewl Jun 2016 #20

So you'll be fine if we rig the election? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #22

I will be happy with whatever it takes to deny the GOP the WH. Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #36

The vote count theft is not inter-party RobertEarl Jun 2016 #41

I have no clue? Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #47

That is an insult to veterans votesparks Jun 2016 #108

Um... wat? Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #109

"insulting veterans" Seems legit ! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #130

What's wrong is wrong. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #88

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #59

Wow... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #60

YOU ARE HAPPY WITH FRAUD! Pastiche423 Jun 2016 #72

I, most certainly, am not "happy with fraud". Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #107

And she isn't a danger to our lives? Pastiche423 Jun 2016 #115

No. Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #124

I so don't agree with you on Amaril Jun 2016 #142

Even Bernie said the elections were not rigged. riversedge Jun 2016 #78

The story is a joke, right? kstewart33 Jun 2016 #77

lol La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #86

Guess what: it's possible to fight both Trump and election fraud at the same time. snot Jun 2016 #119

Thank you. This election is over. If this crazy stuff is true, then work on it for the next election kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #145

It's not a Stanford study. It's a blog by idiots for idiots. randome Jun 2016 #3

"It's a blog by idiots for idiots." And now it's -- shockingly!!-- made its way to GDP!! Number23 Jun 2016 #117

No waaaay! Why is THAT surprising? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #146

Higgins Network News? vdogg Jun 2016 #4

And you? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #24

"If you had done much research ..." MH1 Jun 2016 #63

Have you researched any? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #105

I've done research that has ended up in reputable journals- you have to use data from peer-reviewed kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #147

Please felix_numinous Jun 2016 #56

+1 obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #66

tick tock, tick tock ... time is running out for OPs like this n/t SFnomad Jun 2016 #6

"Tick tock!" Everyone drink! pinebox Jun 2016 #16

There is NO SCHOOL named Standford. apcalc Jun 2016 #7

intentionally mispelled? BootinUp Jun 2016 #10

And the alleged Cal link spells Berkeley without the first "e" — Berkley. brush Jun 2016 #23

Have at it guys and gals. There is so much more including those actual studies... bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #8

Pure garbage. "Widespread fraud?" Outrageous Hortensis Jun 2016 #9

It could be the MIC is involved. Or do we pretend they steer clear of our elections? reformist2 Jun 2016 #12

bernie is one of the MIC's biggest supporters lol. need an F-35? call Uncle Bernie nt msongs Jun 2016 #13

^^ mikeysnot Jun 2016 #27

I know right? Ignorance is bliss. Phlem Jun 2016 #32

I'm pretty sure it was the Illuminati COLGATE4 Jun 2016 #55

+1000 stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #132

Kickin' for the truth! Faux pas Jun 2016 #14

It's not Stanford. It's a grad student. There's been no peer or independent review of the study. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #15

All the many irregularities out there are just nonsense right wrong! bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #19

If one has to lie repeatedly trying to make a point... TwilightZone Jun 2016 #26

this is the second time in two days I have been called a liar. I am not a liar!...unbelievable. bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #39

You could bother to read my post. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #45

Son, you've been had. Again. Squinch Jun 2016 #17

lol nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #21

"Standford" and "Berkley" -- lolz obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #67

The boys at the Higgins News Network are not the best spellers... Squinch Jun 2016 #68

I tried to find them on my Comcast Xfinity obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #127

Noticed the same thing. I mean really!! yardwork Jun 2016 #100

Caralina and Dook obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #126

It's definitely Dook though MadBadger Jun 2016 #129

I know -- i did that one on purpose obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #138

Hey, hey! yardwork Jun 2016 #133

hahaha Go Hails! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #137

Oh stop! Standford is a totally reputable institution! Many graduates go on to Yell or Hartsvard! Number23 Jun 2016 #118

I got my degree in mystical statistics from Hogwarts! Hav Jun 2016 #121

Professor Trelawney teaches it obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #128

And Brun -- Amy Carter went there obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #125

Check out the source of this "report" please. hedda_foil Jun 2016 #18

Because DU is no longer for anyone but Clinton supporters. No choices otherwise bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #25

I am not now and have never been a Clinton supporter. hedda_foil Jun 2016 #31

Probably because Bev Harris is largely considered to be a fraud on DU... TwilightZone Jun 2016 #34

Thanks TZ. I'm hopeless at digging out old threads on are rival versions of DU. hedda_foil Jun 2016 #52

that's a name I haven't seen in years dlwickham Jun 2016 #103

Odds that this is bullshit MattP Jun 2016 #28

We know that. We called the cheating in real time, remember? yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #29

I am not surprised, and while the counts have narrowed in California, Hillary will be the winner still_one Jun 2016 #30

Does it not seem strange to you that she declared victory before the count in CA and elsewhere bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #42

No. That was AP projecting it based on its models and early voting. There are about 1.4 million still_one Jun 2016 #51

"AP seems to think was wrong" TwilightZone Jun 2016 #64

No it does not seem strange to me at all. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #73

Alex Jones-worthy balderdash. You need another hobby... Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #33

Pathetic what Sanders fans have become. woolldog Jun 2016 #35

Yea so pathetic the name calling on here is what is pathetic! bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #43

If the name fits... woolldog Jun 2016 #46

Lol! zappaman Jun 2016 #37

Well, the chances of Bernie being the Dem nominee is...ONE IN ELEVENTY-JILLION! Tarc Jun 2016 #38

Probably you are right because of FRAUD bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #44

Surely you can provide links to sources covering Sanders' legal challenges to a primary result? Tarc Jun 2016 #48

OMG quit being ridiculous, this doesn;t help obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #69

I felt brain cells dying off as I read your post. Metric System Jun 2016 #49

Maybe you should see a neurologist.. bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #58

This 'supposed 'study' used ecit poll discrepancies apcalc Jun 2016 #53

The "studies" author isn't a mathematician ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #136

Ayup. Hillary has learned well from her Bush brethren... AzDar Jun 2016 #54

Nothing to see; Get Over it; Move on...... Chasstev365 Jun 2016 #57

Odd that this was a well reserched Stanford study 1 in 177 billion. nt glennward Jun 2016 #61

... SidDithers Jun 2016 #62

lolz you guys! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #65

Crack pot report (not a study), where you bolded way too much-conspiracy style Sheepshank Jun 2016 #70

Conspiracy theorists are immune to reality realmirage Jun 2016 #71

This fake non-peer-reviewed "study" is simply a lie. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #74

... LexVegas Jun 2016 #75

"In locations...that did keep paper trails" -- you mean like California? Hekate Jun 2016 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #79

It wasn't a Stanford Study and it wasn't peer reviewed. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #80

We found the fraud itsrobert Jun 2016 #81

The is the actual Stanford location where the study was conducted ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #82

I usually don't enter into these kind of 'kook & weirdo' threads.... LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #84

The entire primary was as fake as the moon landing! JoePhilly Jun 2016 #85

hahahahahaha obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #97

One of your best yet JoePhilly! redstateblues Jun 2016 #111

The level of ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #135

Well then they should take the studies to the WH and the DNC and raise hell if they feel concerned. Rex Jun 2016 #83

The same White House hiding her email until after the election? onecaliberal Jun 2016 #87

Then go to the media or Congress, surely this would be front page news all over the world right? Rex Jun 2016 #89

No nothing is bought and paid for. Do you live under a rock? onecaliberal Jun 2016 #91

Then you have no point at all? Rex Jun 2016 #93

I have a great point, I just don't waste time arguing with walls. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #95

Good then you are done and will walk away, with your point still intact. Rex Jun 2016 #96

If you think Americans don't know this election was stolen by the people who own everything onecaliberal Jun 2016 #98

Tell me, when did you first start realizing America was a plutocracy? Rex Jun 2016 #99

You mean the same emails... LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #90

No, I mean the emails that have exposed the fact that the SOS used real names onecaliberal Jun 2016 #94

You still must mean.... LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #113

So, Obama is part of the non-existent election rigging? obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #140

Wow, talk about delusional sore losers. Beacool Jun 2016 #92

Take your stupid post down. Snopes says it is NOT a study. riversedge Jun 2016 #101

Not only not true (as per Snopes) but radical noodle Jun 2016 #102

Snopes merely disproved it was a Stanford study- it's by Stanford/Tillburg grad student researchers AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #110

"Researchers" who've declined to subject their "study" to peer review. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #120

Wasn't she the front-runner from the very beginning? bhikkhu Jun 2016 #104

I feel sorry for you all. It's embarrassing that you believe this crap. nt BreakfastClub Jun 2016 #106

I recommend BSS read Eckhart Tolle's "Power of Now" redstateblues Jun 2016 #112

Researchers must have never listened creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #114

K&R -- thanks from those of us who favor fair and honest elections. senz Jun 2016 #116

Stolen like Bonnie and Clyde. MaeScott Jun 2016 #122

Snopes' take: spooky3 Jun 2016 #123

You don't need outright fraud... tom-servo Jun 2016 #131

Candidates aren't selected by popular vote, they are selected by those that count the vote. -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #134

Kicking for the lolz subthreads! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #139

The hackable voting machine issue still has not been addressed to my satisfaction since 2000. EndElectoral Jun 2016 #143

^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^ pdsimdars Jun 2016 #144

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #148