Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to bravenak (Reply #291)

Don't forget conspiracy theorism. TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #1
Absolutely bravenak Jun 2016 #3
Absolutely and as basic than misogyny and racism. Hortensis Jun 2016 #230
It has a religiosity about it that I just can't understand bravenak Jun 2016 #251
Oh, yes. Areligious fanaticism. For sure. Hortensis Jun 2016 #256
Bingo. I found that among my poker friends. One quietly admitted that HRC is not evil incarnate and bettyellen Jun 2016 #296
appeal to the far right??? what planet are you on?? AntiBank Jun 2016 #294
AntiBank, Sanders set out to draw from the right Hortensis Jun 2016 #298
if you truly mean far hard right, you are delving into white nationalists who would NEVER support a AntiBank Jun 2016 #310
So was that the reason Sarah lost in 2008? yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #79
She is an idiot who could not even give the name of a newspaper she reads. pnwmom Jun 2016 #102
Uh, you're quoting SNL, not reality. MadDAsHell Jun 2016 #134
That skit was based on a real interview with Katie Couric. pnwmom Jun 2016 #137
Agreed TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #197
This Post liberalmike27 Jun 2016 #129
+1! tecelote Jun 2016 #178
+27 k8conant Jun 2016 #308
McCain was the top of that ticket and he lost WhiteTara Jun 2016 #228
Don't forget pacifism. lostnfound Jun 2016 #185
++ Good esp. considering how Bush and Bill work @ UBS Octafish Jun 2016 #200
Excerpt bravenak Jun 2016 #2
It's the "right kind of votes" thing that still gets me mcar Jun 2016 #56
I found it highly insenstive bravenak Jun 2016 #57
Not from purported progressives mcar Jun 2016 #58
I was offended too. WhiteTara Jun 2016 #96
I agree, it is hard to quit them of this type of thinking bravenak Jun 2016 #97
Not a surprise to me Whimsey Jun 2016 #108
No kidding Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2016 #241
I don't know what your REAL purpose is behind these posts Red Knight Jun 2016 #184
I can totally tell who did not even read the first paragraph bravenak Jun 2016 #191
Oh yes--I read it before I responded. Red Knight Jun 2016 #218
The title was also not written by me bravenak Jun 2016 #223
thank you! ruggerson Jun 2016 #203
blah,blah,blah...blah de fucking da Armstead Jun 2016 #212
We all saw your OP about HRC knowing her place... bettyellen Jun 2016 #219
Guess not. Armstead Jun 2016 #220
You did not even read it if thats what you got out of it. bravenak Jun 2016 #226
I did read it....But all that was really needed to know was the offensive headline Armstead Jun 2016 #243
There there, it will be okay bravenak Jun 2016 #249
I don't need your "there, there's" thank you. Armstead Jun 2016 #250
Aww! It's gonna be fine, you'll see. bravenak Jun 2016 #252
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jun 2016 #284
Are you the FBI? bravenak Jun 2016 #286
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jun 2016 #288
... bravenak Jun 2016 #289
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jun 2016 #290
Still not scared bravenak Jun 2016 #291
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #292
So, Glamrock Jun 2016 #4
Try reading the article linked bravenak Jun 2016 #7
The piece of lancer78 Jun 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jun 2016 #285
It's not an article - it's someone's blog. jillan Jun 2016 #104
So? bravenak Jun 2016 #109
I don't want Warren as the VP pick. I would prefer Sec Julian Castro. But I trust underthematrix Jun 2016 #12
Castro is about ready as Rubio would be. Propped up more by the media and institution than anything. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #26
Please do not compare Castro to Rubio. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #55
Some of the things I have seen of Castro are disturbing... JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #81
Would you link please? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #88
It was in the politico profile JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #95
Ah-Politico--the RW mouthpiece!! riversedge Jun 2016 #168
Yet, you love citing scores of their articles when it fits your narrative. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #193
This was a pretty poor source, and more innuendo than factual. Sancho Jun 2016 #181
Positions? Just a lot of Centrist Happy talk and complaints about the GOP. Armstead Jun 2016 #214
Sounds like he'd fit in perfectly with an HRC admin jack_krass Jun 2016 #344
I agree Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #107
Impressed that a DUer has included Asians as people of color. MadDAsHell Jun 2016 #135
yes, as Viet Namese ... Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #187
Would you ever compare two men in such a manner? nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #28
Ouch! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #53
Of course Glamrock Jun 2016 #90
I am so glad you've explained how comparing women's hair color isn't sexist at all. Truly. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #145
... MoonRiver Jun 2016 #204
I, too, found it very strange athena Jun 2016 #208
I suppose anyone who makes fun of Trump's hair is being inappropriate Armstead Jun 2016 #244
Keep digging. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #245
Thank you. I'll dig as much as I want. Armstead Jun 2016 #246
yes why not? azurnoir Jun 2016 #132
That you refer to women by their hair color is not something I would brag about, but you go right msanthrope Jun 2016 #144
you asked if anyone would refer to men in that manner I replied I didn't refer to any women azurnoir Jun 2016 #149
OMG....You mentioned your hair color! Armstead Jun 2016 #247
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jun 2016 #287
I'm sure that the hypothetical Sanders supporter you reference annavictorious Jun 2016 #49
The point was denying the legitimacy of her victory Whimsey Jun 2016 #110
The OP is the perfect, perfect rhetorical frame. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #123
The article isn't about people who don't support Hillary, it's about people who DENY THAT SHE WON. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #299
I'll accept that you have a link but call the claim absolute bullshit. But you have every right to floriduck Jun 2016 #5
It's not bullshit at all. I called this months agi bravenak Jun 2016 #6
Then I guess your call is bullshit too. Everyone makes mistakes at some point. floriduck Jun 2016 #8
+ a zillion 840high Jun 2016 #77
+ a zillion and one chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #86
Saying 'rooted' goes too far, but there is an element of that in the tone-deafness. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #9
I think the titles always do that bombastic thing bravenak Jun 2016 #24
you know DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #10
Hard for them to see since it's not aimed at them bravenak Jun 2016 #27
Reminds me of my first pass at grad school, where I began to have my doubts about ... Hekate Jun 2016 #125
Every F'ing thing about Clinton RazBerryBeret Jun 2016 #11
This. She's done so much... scscholar Jun 2016 #16
Just think what her presidency RazBerryBeret Jun 2016 #17
Tick tock! leftofcool Jun 2016 #61
You are a woman? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #66
How so? DawgHouse Jun 2016 #82
Same here. 840high Jun 2016 #78
That is a very broad generalization, which indicates a lack of critical thinking. tabasco Jun 2016 #13
It is an amazing, gratuitous over-simplification. Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #44
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #59
+1,000,000 ancianita Jun 2016 #242
Right, Criticizing Clinton is racist because she's white. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #14
Criticizing PoC who vote for her as having "Stockholm Syndrome" certainly is. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #33
the racist part is about dismissing the fact that she won largely because of the margins qdouble Jun 2016 #41
Presenting POCs as a unified homogenous block is racist. chascarrillo Jun 2016 #201
Most != homogenous uponit7771 Jun 2016 #205
No, saying stuff like "Hillary won the Confederacy" is. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #47
No. But denying the votes of the millions of largely black and latino voters pnwmom Jun 2016 #106
ummmmm no Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #113
Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, UBS, and millions in cash have much more to do think Jun 2016 #15
Exactly. elleng Jun 2016 #18
.+1 840high Jun 2016 #80
"When people say that Clinton stole the election or that Sanders is the true winner, sufrommich Jun 2016 #19
"The right kind of votes" Quayblue Jun 2016 #25
Not in my case she's likable enough, I don't want her near the White House Autumn Jun 2016 #20
Not in my case. I just don't like him period. But, I don't like angry white men. leftofcool Jun 2016 #63
I don't like angry men either, black or white. Interesting how you added race to it. nt Autumn Jun 2016 #74
Perhaps not in your case, but it has been demonstrated on DU, Kos, etc. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #83
You calling the overwhelming number of jews who support Hillary antisemites MattP Jun 2016 #100
Don't know where you got that, you must have replied to the wrong person . Autumn Jun 2016 #111
It's Hill-logic. Get used to it... jack_krass Jun 2016 #346
Bernie is no more jewish than I am Whimsey Jun 2016 #115
Nonsense. Bernie has not touted any religious roots. nt Autumn Jun 2016 #117
Well seeing what happened to his father's family someone had their number. gordianot Jun 2016 #128
Oh, did your grandparents die in the Holocaust? Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #231
NO my grandparents survived German occupation in WWI Whimsey Jun 2016 #358
More hill-logic, being jewish means a race and culture jack_krass Jun 2016 #347
Yep jack_krass Jun 2016 #345
It's all true. It was on the internet. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #21
This: ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #22
Exactly bravenak Jun 2016 #38
Wrong. babylonsister Jun 2016 #23
The article isn't about Sanders supporters in general, just the holdouts ucrdem Jun 2016 #30
As a holdout... Chan790 Jun 2016 #37
It said at the beginning it was not about everyone, just a portion bravenak Jun 2016 #32
Then maybe your OP title should reflect that. babylonsister Jun 2016 #40
I copied the title verbatim bravenak Jun 2016 #42
This article is about Bernie supporters who deny she won the primary Whimsey Jun 2016 #112
. Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #29
No, it's not. Chan790 Jun 2016 #31
You obviously did not read it bravenak Jun 2016 #35
Posts about gender and race bring out the old players ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #48
Feel like old times!!! bravenak Jun 2016 #50
Sure does! ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #52
What you advocate is not going to happen. leftofcool Jun 2016 #64
In 2008, there were a small number of Clinton supporters who hoped Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #34
Maybe they were bravenak Jun 2016 #36
Quite a few of those PUMAs were indeed racist.nt sufrommich Jun 2016 #43
You are making a different point than the article. Whimsey Jun 2016 #118
Yes, it is. nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #39
Lol!! Keep going back to the well eh? SMDH Arazi Jun 2016 #46
The denial phase. HassleCat Jun 2016 #51
You know what I think? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #62
Yeah... no. anAustralianobserver Jun 2016 #54
I accept Clinton as the nominee. I just won't vote for her. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #60
Bye bye! leftofcool Jun 2016 #65
See you. Where are you going? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #69
Then DU is not the site for you. athena Jun 2016 #67
I think you would probably be happier there. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #68
Because I support the Democratic Party's presidential nominee? athena Jun 2016 #70
I was thinking about the issues. But you are right, it doesn't really matter which site. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #71
Clearly, you have not bothered to look at Hillary's positions on the issues. athena Jun 2016 #76
It can be a bit difficult since she is constantly flipping but I assure you that I know where she Live and Learn Jun 2016 #91
Thanks for the insult. athena Jun 2016 #93
The insulter is now insulted? Cute. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #198
Al From laughs.... think Jun 2016 #75
5 more days. You have 5 more days to tell this mixed raced woman jillan Jun 2016 #72
Was your name in this article? bravenak Jun 2016 #85
That article nailed it. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #73
I don't agree with that. bigwillq Jun 2016 #84
This is not about thise who accept that she won bravenak Jun 2016 #87
Before I even finish reading the article..... Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #89
I agree that he has not pulled her to the left bravenak Jun 2016 #94
This is total bullshit ciaobaby Jun 2016 #92
That's not what the article said Whimsey Jun 2016 #121
My opinion aside ciaobaby Jun 2016 #124
Well you certainly haven't stated why you think the win was illegitimate Whimsey Jun 2016 #293
let's try this again ciaobaby Jun 2016 #297
OK you made the argument that if a white male thought the process was rigged Whimsey Jun 2016 #316
It is apparent you have already made up your mind ciaobaby Jun 2016 #355
You missed my point Whimsey Jun 2016 #357
I don't think it is wise for you to compare what Hillary did in 2008. ciaobaby Jun 2016 #359
+1 (NT) Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #122
Reminds me of birtherism treestar Jun 2016 #98
Me too. This is terrible bravenak Jun 2016 #99
And racist? TheFarseer Jun 2016 #101
Here here!! She has been calling me a racist for a year (?) and I am a mixed race. jillan Jun 2016 #103
Yeah , I'm white and I hate Hillary because she is white TheFarseer Jun 2016 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author m-lekktor Jun 2016 #114
comprehension much? Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #116
No, I get it TheFarseer Jun 2016 #120
yes, it makes perfect sense Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #188
They have a thing about projection. VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #350
Wow, does that person do anything Besides post on message boards? TheFarseer Jun 2016 #356
I dont think so swhisper1 Jun 2016 #119
This is fucked up! peace13 Jun 2016 #126
Everything is bravenak Jun 2016 #127
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #130
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #131
Absolutely there's unconscious misogyny. betsuni Jun 2016 #133
I agree with you bravenak Jun 2016 #140
I think the assumption that she must be lying about EVERYTHING gollygee Jun 2016 #158
I will bookmark this for link evidence, thanks. betsuni Jun 2016 #173
As another poster said, this article is genius propaganda knowing liberals are terrified of... MadDAsHell Jun 2016 #136
If people vote based on the ops I post? bravenak Jun 2016 #143
You're awfully prideful aren't you? MadDAsHell Jun 2016 #282
You do realize that you are replying to your own self with this post, right? bravenak Jun 2016 #283
What's your opinion about the article you linked to? tralala Jun 2016 #138
Some of it bravenak Jun 2016 #141
Nah...i just simply don't like corrupt candidates... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #139
IMO a rather lazy catch all appeals to the emotions no critical thinking required azurnoir Jun 2016 #142
So, if you don't believe Hillary won the nomination fair and square AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #146
Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. So spot on. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #147
No, it's rooted in cheating and corporate control of the message. cui bono Jun 2016 #148
That accusation has now been hurled so many times, Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #150
I think women MFM008 Jun 2016 #151
Is this your opinion? Lunabell Jun 2016 #152
yes, that is the op's opinion. She's made it abundantly clear in many posts cali Jun 2016 #156
She did run a racist campaign in 08 bravenak Jun 2016 #274
Still beating this drum? PaulaFarrell Jun 2016 #153
This is the same type of op I posted before this primary started. bravenak Jun 2016 #164
sorry you can't post something and expect people not to read it PaulaFarrell Jun 2016 #216
People posting in ths very thread did not bother to 'read' it. Just complain. bravenak Jun 2016 #221
what disgusting bull. And I say that as someone who accepted that cali Jun 2016 #154
Almost like you voted for the white woman, you anti-Semite! Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #157
Funny how automatically you seem to think I wrote this or completely agree with anything bravenak Jun 2016 #161
Obvious is obvious And you are nothing if not obvious. cali Jun 2016 #195
I never was a front bravenak Jun 2016 #227
The last time I checked, Hillary and Bernie are both Caucasian. B Calm Jun 2016 #155
So what. bravenak Jun 2016 #166
I suppose just not agreeing with the candidate's positions is out of the question. Vinca Jun 2016 #159
People should read the writing posted at the link bravenak Jun 2016 #167
You sure it doesn't have anything to do with a $15 minimum wage? Ash_F Jun 2016 #160
Not everything follows your idea of what people do or should want bravenak Jun 2016 #162
Another race baiting flame post from a Hillary supporter allowed to stand! B Calm Jun 2016 #163
How about you try to concentrate on your own posts? bravenak Jun 2016 #165
Well of course you believe that, after all you did DURec your own OP. B Calm Jun 2016 #169
Absolutely bravenak Jun 2016 #171
I don't think people are reading the linked opinion piece gollygee Jun 2016 #170
Thank you for posting that bravenak Jun 2016 #172
Refusal to acknowledge inequality is rooted in wealth and power. Orsino Jun 2016 #174
Not always the case bravenak Jun 2016 #175
Accepting that she won a rigged process is another necessary step in our evolution. Orsino Jun 2016 #177
K&R! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #176
It most Definately IS rooted in Bigotry. Sky Masterson Jun 2016 #179
Why must you post your anti Hillary/Mighty Israel posts here? bravenak Jun 2016 #183
The post claimed that lack of support for hillary was bigotry Sky Masterson Jun 2016 #186
So you just decided not to actually read the linked piece and instead let me know bravenak Jun 2016 #190
I read about two lines of it. Sky Masterson Jun 2016 #192
It doesn't say that gollygee Jun 2016 #281
Nonsense... KansDem Jun 2016 #180
Yes, those refusers love her policies, love election irregularities, but hate her gender and race. Scuba Jun 2016 #182
Lies. PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #189
Why do some hillary supporters continue to try to stir up shit? Like this OP? Why????? nt Logical Jun 2016 #194
Hillary's war mongering, and her supporters cpwm17 Jun 2016 #196
4 more days...NUFF SAID MoonRiver Jun 2016 #202
Selfishness is the cause of all evil in this world. cpwm17 Jun 2016 #206
I certainly don't defend war. And who, exactly, was commander in chief MoonRiver Jun 2016 #207
That would be Bush. cpwm17 Jun 2016 #209
So, in case you didn't know, here is the list of DEMOCRATIC Senators who voted yay. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #210
Hillary, to this day, openly supports war. cpwm17 Jun 2016 #213
Please post links to support those claims. Thank you in advance. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #217
Here are some: cpwm17 Jun 2016 #233
Well, MoonRiver Jun 2016 #248
Have no idea why discussion of Hillary and US internal politics gets turned into anti Israel screed bravenak Jun 2016 #240
K&R Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #199
K&R workinclasszero Jun 2016 #211
I agree MaggieD Jun 2016 #215
So glad to see you bravenak Jun 2016 #222
Nice to see you too MaggieD Jun 2016 #224
Surprised too......... bravenak Jun 2016 #225
Or it could be that.. OKDem08 Jun 2016 #229
This article is a crock of shit democrattotheend Jun 2016 #232
what the writer fails to understand- Deb Jun 2016 #234
Not enough will leave and we will need to bring in moderates to make up for you guys who do leave bravenak Jun 2016 #235
Some of it is, some of it is just plain old stubbornness and pettiness. Rex Jun 2016 #236
Yep bravenak Jun 2016 #237
Me too, I always planned on voting for the primary winner. Rex Jun 2016 #238
I am pretty positive that many of the 'dead enders' are not really on our side anyway bravenak Jun 2016 #239
Agreed and that applies to many topics, a lot of us overlap somewhere in our progressive ideology. Rex Jun 2016 #269
The ones who don't fear a Trump presidency or a Trumpian Supreme Court bravenak Jun 2016 #271
OMG. Cruz scared the shit out of me! Rex Jun 2016 #273
He reminded me of that Left Behind series bravenak Jun 2016 #275
Oh yeah, speaking of another wackadoodle the man himself - Kirk Cameron. Rex Jun 2016 #279
So true. bravenak Jun 2016 #280
If you believe that, then you must also believe she's unelectable. Marr Jun 2016 #253
She doesn't say that opposing Hillary is based on racism and misogyny gollygee Jun 2016 #254
So it's a sort of low simmering racism/misogyny, that will evaporate after the convention? Marr Jun 2016 #257
What? gollygee Jun 2016 #259
Actually, Bravenak just clarified her own point, and it isn't the one you made. Marr Jun 2016 #260
That is not what I said at all bravenak Jun 2016 #262
Regardless, it isn't a big group of people gollygee Jun 2016 #263
Not a big chunk bravenak Jun 2016 #255
You're counting on Libertarians and Republicans... Marr Jun 2016 #258
I'm saying that many of the holdouts ARE libertarians and Republixans bravenak Jun 2016 #261
That's even more nonsensical. Marr Jun 2016 #264
Many of his voters were NOT DEMOCRATS bravenak Jun 2016 #265
I also saw threads started by people gollygee Jun 2016 #266
I saw that time and time again bravenak Jun 2016 #268
Many of Hillary's supporters are Independents, too. Marr Jun 2016 #267
Hillary never tried to pull in Trump voters bravenak Jun 2016 #270
This is one of the more frustrating threads ever gollygee Jun 2016 #276
I think they just look at my name and the title and just make assumptions bravenak Jun 2016 #278
Exactly. If it's this bad among Sanders supporters, imagine what it's like among non-liberals. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #295
Of course hope stupid of me...... whistler162 Jun 2016 #272
This is not about you then bravenak Jun 2016 #277
OMG... I didn't record this, all these days. ;) . I believe. Nt seabeyond Jun 2016 #300
Strange how they now want her to 'beg' thrm for their votes bravenak Jun 2016 #301
Beg Sanders. The winner get on her knees and .... BEG Sanders. Ya. Pretty damn disrespectful seabeyond Jun 2016 #302
They are so transparent bravenak Jun 2016 #303
Pretty transparent as they point elsewhere and insist we look away. Nt seabeyond Jun 2016 #304
Oh yes. The only thing worse than sexism is talking about sexism bravenak Jun 2016 #306
No it's not. In fact, if HRC were a man with the same resume and the same PROBLEMS, he never jonno99 Jun 2016 #305
Bullshit bravenak Jun 2016 #307
Here's the line that I almost stopped at: bonemachine Jun 2016 #309
It kinda is a fact bravenak Jun 2016 #311
the problem with the assertion is that bonemachine Jun 2016 #313
Its a democratic party - not an independent party Whimsey Jun 2016 #319
Those are your opinions bonemachine Jun 2016 #322
Clinton won by any measurable metric. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #312
open primaries would have been one leveler... bonemachine Jun 2016 #315
Another blogger with an opinion masquerading around as Exilednight Jun 2016 #314
That's the thing, too bonemachine Jun 2016 #354
Oh yeah-that's it for sure. jalan48 Jun 2016 #317
A nasty, factless, baiting editorial. (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #318
Yes, and denial of the above maladies. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #320
Hillary got more Votes. And, a huge majority of those votes come from POC and Women Cha Jun 2016 #321
I really cannot see why they are still trying the same tactics today bravenak Jun 2016 #325
They don't want us to talk about this reality. either.. they're still trying Cha Jun 2016 #328
He showed us which groups are worth his attention and which ones are not bravenak Jun 2016 #329
From the very beginning his approach was misguided.. if he thought he had Cha Jun 2016 #331
That is why he lost bravenak Jun 2016 #333
I know you will, brave, and I thank all of you from the Cha Jun 2016 #334
Awww! bravenak Jun 2016 #335
So Happy Cha Jun 2016 #336
Please stop dividing people by race, gender or whatever a narrow mind can possibly contrive ... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #323
Please stop acting like the cause of racial division is black people discusding racial issues bravenak Jun 2016 #324
Never said that, just comparing the "History Made" of Clinton campaign, which many are promoting ... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #330
Maybe some segments of the population have had too much power over others for too long and bravenak Jun 2016 #332
Can you imagine a 20 year old, poor Jewish man chaining himself to a black person ... slipslidingaway Jun 2016 #337
Of course I can imagine it bravenak Jun 2016 #339
Thank you for this Haveadream Jun 2016 #365
They who? here's my take what has deveeloped this campaign as I've already stated azurnoir Jun 2016 #338
You know what? Not everything is about you personally and I actually avoid getting into it with you bravenak Jun 2016 #340
No it quite obviously wasn't about me personally but I outlined how I was affected personally azurnoir Jun 2016 #341
Very difficult to suss out your meanings bravenak Jun 2016 #342
Bull. It's rooted in a love of traditional FDR style Democratic values, which get little support highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #326
FDR who left the military segregated and left blacks and domestics (women) out of social security? bravenak Jun 2016 #327
Wrong again.... this is ban-bait, but Ill bite.... jack_krass Jun 2016 #343
Get ready for James Comey to be labeled the biggest sexist in the history of men. n/t yodermon Jun 2016 #348
Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate in the field Gothmog Jun 2016 #349
So completely dumb as hell. n/t Herman4747 Jun 2016 #351
This lady begs to differ: Herman4747 Jun 2016 #352
Why should I care what she has to say? bravenak Jun 2016 #361
Of course, it couldn't be her right-of-center politics that doesn't sell well NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #353
You could not possibly have read it if that's what you got from it bravenak Jun 2016 #360
I reject the entire premise of the title NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #362
Then you were just complaining based on title bravenak Jun 2016 #363
Don't forget simple gullibility. Jakes Progress Jun 2016 #364
I agree with the author except for her claim that open primaries would be "fairer." SunSeeker Jun 2016 #366
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Refusal to accept Clinton...»Reply #292