Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)In from canvassing, Bernie supporters said media says HRC is nominee, why vote [View all]
My husband repeated this when I got home. He said the news he saw said
NBC said that Hillary now had enough delegates and had won the nomination.
This is unbelievable treachery.
If Bernie loses California, this is on the HRC campaign and the corrupt media.
Totally unconscionable, unbelievably corrupt, to try to depress the Bernie vote.
If HRC wins California, it's because of this outrageously evil tactic
Hillary supporters, think about this: a candidate who resorts to this does so because they can only win by these means.
Believe me, I and the canvassing team tonight are enraged.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
148 replies, 8661 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (67)
ReplyReply to this post
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In from canvassing, Bernie supporters said media says HRC is nominee, why vote [View all]
amborin
Jun 2016
OP
If you really think she has power over the associated press, then maybe she really should win.
eastwestdem
Jun 2016
#45
So true, HRC campaign was just as suprised by this as anyone. They had big plans for tomorrow night.
eastwestdem
Jun 2016
#47
DEM ESTABLISHMENT BEHIND IT... CORRUPTION ON AN EPIC SCALE! UNIFY? WHAT'S THAT?
CorporatistNation
Jun 2016
#18
But that fact doesn't fit the narrative of evil Hllary, so they will ignore it. nt
BreakfastClub
Jun 2016
#19
Don't even waste your breath. Some are so blinded with their bias, they have lost
still_one
Jun 2016
#56
No. There have been too many of these little "incidents" for it to be a coincidence.
Enthusiast
Jun 2016
#115
Ironic handle for one who endorses the same old, same old. I have voted since 1972. McGovern.
Land of Enchantment
Jun 2016
#131
The OP seems to ignore that there are other issues, and elected offices on the ballot
still_one
Jun 2016
#57
Hillary won a long time ago. So I don't see how she could "only win by these means."
BzaDem
Jun 2016
#3
This is well within historical norms. This was obvious. We should celebrate the first female nominee
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#4
Take Sanders himself. He recognized then Senator Obama before Hillary ceded and long before
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#29
Sure do, I understood that Hillary wrapped up the nomination on Super Tuesday.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#32
Tonight is a night to find common ground. For instance, your screen name and my avatar reflect
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#37
it just MIGHT be possible that these people are SMART enough to find out who is who without
msongs
Jun 2016
#15
The AP is in frequent contact with *all* superdelegates throughout the entire election cycle.
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#24
In what fantasy universe does this actually matter? Even a narrow win in CA meant NOTHING for Bernie
Zynx
Jun 2016
#11
Bernie was slated to win California by a significant margin and it would have humiliated HRC and sho
amborin
Jun 2016
#61
umm BERNIE himself said the process is NOT RIGGED and he knew the rules before playing ->
msongs
Jun 2016
#17
If voters are upset SBS can't win... it's because their candidate lied that he had a path.
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#25
She hasn't cheated one damn bit. That is a lie, and it reflects poorly on you. nt
BreakfastClub
Jun 2016
#22
you are incorrect; HRC would have lost California in the most humiliating manner and it would have c
amborin
Jun 2016
#65
it does matter; she was going to lose CA and be embarrassingly revealed as the weak and disliked
amborin
Jun 2016
#67
she originally had a 63% lead in California, and Bernie was slated to win! mortifying for HRC
amborin
Jun 2016
#87
yes, bec canvassing revealed Bernie had huge support here among all demographics
amborin
Jun 2016
#68
Bernie caught off guard? how do you propose to control the corrupt complicit media?
amborin
Jun 2016
#88
Even if your theory is true (it's not) all it shows is that Bernie is too weak to play hardball
alcibiades_mystery
Jun 2016
#95
I actually agree that this should not have been done. I disagree that its Hillarys fault. Unless...
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#90
you know NOTHING! first, i posted this yesterday June 6; second THERE WAS CANVASSING TODAY, ALSO
amborin
Jun 2016
#144
the majority of 2383 that is needed in 2026.. she short by 200 ish. she should get that tonite.
asuhornets
Jun 2016
#113
Now it should be clear to all why the announcement was made before the primaries ended
Doctor_J
Jun 2016
#119
If Hillary loses the General Election, it's on Hillary's supporters. Period. [n/t]
Maedhros
Jun 2016
#132
It's hard to predict what will happen. Perhaps some Clinton supporters won't bother to
totodeinhere
Jun 2016
#123
If something you see on the news can make you not vote, then voting is not for you anyway.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#125
Nothing would stop my vote. NOTHING. And these kids can't go out because they're having a sad.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#127
What's "totally unconscionable" is your dismissal of the voters because you didn't get your guy.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#142
this will go down in history as one of the all time greatest campaign dirty tricks
Cheese Sandwich
Jun 2016
#143