Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: WSJ/NBC Poll: Hillary Clinton Holds 2-Point Lead Ahead of California Primary [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)7. Anecdtoal I know
Last edited Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:50 PM - Edit history (1)
but a couple of my neighbors are sitting it out. You see they hold clearances, they were very much pro HRC until the OIG report came out, and they read editorials, They cannot vote for her on national security grounds. They have convinced a few of their friends NOT TO VOTE for HRC on those grounds. There is aub story that is making the rounds, and pissing people in the Intel community off to end.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/kristian-saucier-investigation-hillary-clinton-223646
One of them alerted me to this story. Chew on that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WSJ/NBC Poll: Hillary Clinton Holds 2-Point Lead Ahead of California Primary [View all]
NWCorona
Jun 2016
OP
It won't affect who is the nominee but that doesn't make it irrelevant.
Cheese Sandwich
Jun 2016
#26
Some of these folks have the attitude that the United States woudl be better without CA
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#32
None really knowns becuase of the surge of registrations to the deadline
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#59
2% is hardly anything especially when one realizes it falls within the error zone
azurnoir
Jun 2016
#30
No it isn't it's based on a suit brought by Sanders supporters that a judge refused to consider
azurnoir
Jun 2016
#33
How big was the absentee/already voted sample? Was it included in the overall results?
LonePirate
Jun 2016
#15
This is what alot of these guys don't seem to get and I'm not sure why. Even if Sanders wins
Number23
Jun 2016
#63
It's pretty rare when California can decide the nominee. I look for a huge turnout.
B Calm
Jun 2016
#19
Hillary had a huge lead in California just a few weeks ago. She's falling fast.
imagine2015
Jun 2016
#21
Pay attention, please, California... her trajectory ain't looking good against tRump.
JudyM
Jun 2016
#25
If they are Republicans they do not get to vote in the Democratic Primary
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#39
They could have changed their registration up till a couple weeks ago- with minimum effort.
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#51
I am shocked at how many here claim they have changed registration- and more than once-
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#54
Was just correcting your mistake that there was no time for them to switch to Republican....
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#60
Wow, thought I saw +13 on DU about an hour ago...She's dropping FAST. -nt-
NorthCarolina
Jun 2016
#48