Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 
13. That's strange
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:35 PM
Apr 2016

because it's a fact that 3 crimes have already been proven. No doubt about them.

1) Destruction of government property
Hillary deleted about 30k "personal" emails. Turns out, someone hacked Blumenthal's email account and recovered correspondence between Hillary and Sid that had to do with Libya. That is not "personal", that is "work". "Work" emails don't belong to Hillary, they belong to the people of the US. Hillary, by her own admission, instructed the "personal" emails to be separated and deleted.

2) Obstruction of Justice
Why did Hillary instruct correspondence between her and Sid to be classified as "personal" and then deleted? Was it a simple mistake? Let's ask a jury.

3) Conspiracy
Hillary, by her own admission, has already said she did not personally separate the emails or actually press the delete key to eliminate the "personal" ones. She instructed someone else to do that. No matter how you cut it, that's entering a conspiracy to destroy government property.

I'll give it a shot WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #1
This is the second time today you invoked the Indictment Fairy DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #6
The OP asked for a path WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #10
I rely on analyses by trained lawyers and former prosecutors. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #11
That's strange WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #13
" Given enough time I can cite the analyses. I have them bookmarked." DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #16
Instead of citing anlysis from pro-Hillary sources WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #23
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #24
The problem with your "analysts" is all the same problem WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #29
Will it go around in circles? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #30
I Don't even Think Bernie wins Nomination if Clinton was Somehow Indicted Stallion Apr 2016 #21
is she or is she not being criminally ivestigated by the FBI .. (not partisan congress but the FBI)? berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #27
When someone talks about this issue, there is a definite "tell" WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #32
Not possible TeacherB87 Apr 2016 #2
She will be nominated and the Republicans will launch a new scandal... Human101948 Apr 2016 #3
Still not buying it... TeacherB87 Apr 2016 #4
She has onions. The former Massachusetts governor didn't. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #7
Bernie Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver joins Steve Kornacki for a little delegate math: w4rma Apr 2016 #5
After next Tuesday he will need to win the remaining contests 65-35 but whatever. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #8
Yep. Being conservative, I expect his new number to be 65.6% of the remaining PDs. morningfog Apr 2016 #15
Despite my unkind words when provoked I have no genuine animus for the guy. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #18
I think most here enjoy the heat of the battle. morningfog Apr 2016 #20
:) jcgoldie Apr 2016 #9
You do realize, that the clip you posted isn't very flattering for Weaver? Kornacki gulps in FSogol Apr 2016 #12
Here's some REAL Math jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #14
Not sure if lying, or sadly misinformed Tarc Apr 2016 #17
Sorry it was Bernie 9 Hillary 8 Blue States jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #19
Using your states with one correction, lets examine electoral weight LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #31
Corection for your list.. 9 to 7 jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #34
Thanks. You're right it was 2008. LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #35
Actually counting only the no "shenanigan" states it is Bernie jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #38
Bernie supporters have "alleged shenanigans" in every contest Hillary has won. LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #39
Alleged = Documented jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #40
Your first two links only point to front pages. The last link looks Like The "Sane" Progressives LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #41
I'm Going Out on a Limb and Think She Can Get the Pledged Delegates BEFORE Convention Stallion Apr 2016 #22
Noone is going to get to that number before the convention. MATH. (nt) w4rma Apr 2016 #25
Irrelevant. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #26
Doesn't. Really. Matter.... More importantly, show me the math where Clinton... Raster Apr 2016 #28
Neither did Obama in 2008 Tarc Apr 2016 #33
It's 2383. Not that it matters. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #37
I have Hillary with 2195 pledged delegates MadBadger Apr 2016 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Request: show the math su...»Reply #13