Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Brava! CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #1
Thank you! It is actually complicated stuff (as is to be expected IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #4
It's actually unbelievable. Keystone Kops in a way. Secretary of State, FFS. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #27
IdaBroggs, this is a concise explanation! Well done! However, I think you should add... FourScore Apr 2016 #69
ANALYSIS: No, Hillary Clinton Did Not Commit a Crime ... at Least Based on What We Know Today Gothmog Apr 2016 #101
With respect, that is pure speculation based on incomplete data. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #114
Diane Feinstein-There is nothing new here Gothmog Apr 2016 #124
That is not a good analysis. You can get ten years for leaving secret docs on a bar stool. leveymg Apr 2016 #139
Here's something I learned . . . there are NO government documents marked "classified" pdsimdars Apr 2016 #72
Oh, that's very interesting. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #129
This is exactly why the government... tex-wyo-dem Apr 2016 #90
Why Hillary Won't Be Indicted and Shouldn't Be: An Objective Legal Analysis Gothmog Apr 2016 #97
As credible as a Psychic Call to Ms. Chloe & Her Tarot Hotline. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #120
How about Senator Feinstein as a source Gothmog Apr 2016 #123
See Reply #70. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #136
"Some Or All" Of Clinton Emails Designated SAP Referenced Public Information About U.S. Drone Strike Gothmog Apr 2016 #140
No. Much of the TS classified material was NSA information dealing with events in Libya. leveymg Apr 2016 #151
CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton Gothmog Apr 2016 #193
What I see: of 127 Sid emails, only one appears to have been partial redacted by the Comm. leveymg Apr 2016 #194
It is sad to see people being fooled by Howdy Gowdy Gothmog Apr 2016 #195
There was one email where a name was redacted unnecessarily. You failed to make your case here. leveymg Apr 2016 #196
I'm afraid that "no harm" defense hasn't worked in the courts. leveymg Apr 2016 #160
You are wrong again Gothmog Apr 2016 #174
You're just a broken record, a tape on a loop, a gif. Same scrap leveymg Apr 2016 #183
I am amused that you actually think that you understand the legal concepts being discussed Gothmog Apr 2016 #184
Delighted you are amused. But, again you err. Petraeus' binders weren't marked classified, but leveymg Apr 2016 #185
Do you tire of being wrong? Gothmog Apr 2016 #187
Nowhere does that state that his books were marked classifed; Sec 1924 and 793 r different statutes leveymg Apr 2016 #188
There are remedial reading courses that could help you on this Gothmog Apr 2016 #189
I thought DiFi was busy lying to the American people about the wretched effects legal weed is having Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #163
This is one of those bait and switch analyses. Doesn't mention Sec. 793 the statute most leveymg Apr 2016 #145
You are Wrong again Gothmog Apr 2016 #149
I make a living parsing federal and state statutes for things such as intent and mens rea. leveymg Apr 2016 #154
A key word in the Clinton email investigation: 'knowingly Gothmog Apr 2016 #158
There are six separate crimes under 793. (e) and (f) do not require specific intent leveymg Apr 2016 #161
Brit Hume is a fox news reporter but he is not a total idiot Gothmog Apr 2016 #159
LOL This is the perfect subtitle for this whole thread. nt procon Apr 2016 #178
I was required to take training on proper handling of classified information shawn703 Apr 2016 #176
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2016 #198
Thank you for this compilation. chervilant Apr 2016 #2
Most welcome and thank you for the kind words. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #8
Why no sourcing of these amusing but false claims? Gothmog Apr 2016 #102
I have posted many links to sources in numerous comments, and explained why IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #138
The links you are using are sad but funny Gothmog Apr 2016 #143
Excellent summary AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #3
Thank you - three decades as an IT geek translating for my innocent users -- IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #6
The 147 was pulled out of Grassley's ass. GeorgeGist Apr 2016 #5
My guess is someone pulled a report against a cost center code IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #7
When was the last time that you or someone you knew had just one FBI agent investigating personaly nolabels Apr 2016 #99
Do you think having no permanent Inspector General in place at the time mak3cats Apr 2016 #9
That may have to do with how she spent the budget money -- IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #13
Thank You For This Non-Techy Account Of This..... global1 Apr 2016 #10
1) is a flat-out "no", which renders the rest moot Tarc Apr 2016 #11
That depends on what your definition of "gross negligence" is rachacha Apr 2016 #16
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #33
The standard is indeed high, but whether an action meets rachacha Apr 2016 #35
She knew that she was going to run for POTUS Madam Mossfern Apr 2016 #67
Ooh! Boy, is that "official" response full of bald faced lies! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #44
GOP created this story, and did so to try and destroy Hillary Clinton's chances to be president. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #80
They didn't create *the facts* of what she did, which apparently warrant investigation, at a minimum JudyM Apr 2016 #84
And here's the specific law she could get dinged on: rachacha Apr 2016 #12
Thank you - hopefully that makes sense to people. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #22
There is no specific intent or mens rea here Gothmog Apr 2016 #103
Wow - "removed from its proper place of custody"...would that include jmg257 Apr 2016 #36
There are multiple people whose careers included high level security IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #39
Thanks for bringing that up...thoughtful stuff. Its appreciated! :). Nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #41
I held a government security clearance for many years before I retired. ... spin Apr 2016 #89
Thank you for your service! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #100
Thanks for your support. (n/t) spin Apr 2016 #157
Yes... nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #42
"Gross negligence" basically = reckless disregard, as opposed to inadvertence. JudyM Apr 2016 #87
There's a flaw in #12 jeff47 Apr 2016 #14
I thought her server was subpoenaed under Benghazi authority? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #18
Nope. It's completely independent of the Benghazi crap. jeff47 Apr 2016 #24
Okay, here is why it is confusing (and I am not sure I agree with you) IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #30
There's more than one FOIA lawsuit. jeff47 Apr 2016 #37
That still doesn't jibe with the official reports about the "discovery" IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #38
blumenthal didn't "turn over" e-mails , did he? questionseverything Apr 2016 #77
He brought approx 150 emails when he was subpoenaed by the Benghazi committee. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #88
Also regarding Blumenthal's emails: PatV Apr 2016 #132
Thank you well done clear and to the point awake Apr 2016 #15
Thank you! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #19
You are amazing, and this is a wonderful op! Punkingal Apr 2016 #17
Thank you! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author rbrnmw Apr 2016 #21
bookmark!! dana_b Apr 2016 #23
Well done! berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #25
So anything on this server even emails turned in is a liability? gordianot Apr 2016 #26
TRUE: "The mere fact that it exists was a breach of security with potential consequences." IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #29
The degree to which you are completely full of crap on this is mind-boggling Tarc Apr 2016 #34
Now that is just rude. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #45
She did none of those things either, so hop off your goddamned high horse Tarc Apr 2016 #61
Factually incorrect. You keep voicing AN OPINION as if your wishes IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #64
You can carry the conservative Republican water all you like, won't make this issue more palatable Tarc Apr 2016 #68
ARGH! Okay, I am going to try one more time - IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #70
Right now, you are lying Tarc Apr 2016 #75
You are so out of your fucking league on this. frylock Apr 2016 #79
No, TARC is a liberal, a Democrat who supports the party and is aware Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #81
Blind partisanship isn't going to save Mrs. Clinton. frylock Apr 2016 #83
So you openly have hatred for the Democratic Party, noted. I know why Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #92
I have an open dislike for conservative policy. frylock Apr 2016 #93
That is ludicrous. Which of us will vote to prevent women from dying from self abortions? Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #94
Hey, guess what? I live in a blue state, so my vote is of ZERO consequence. frylock Apr 2016 #104
That is not the point, is it. Your attitude is carried with you everywhere you go. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #105
I don't proselytize to family members or coworkers. frylock Apr 2016 #108
Really, your very negative attitude about Hillary is only expressed here on DU? Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #109
Pretty much everyone I associate with has a negative view of Hillary. frylock Apr 2016 #112
Sent or received, it was ON THE SERVER per the Inspector General IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #86
Your sourcing of this amusing collection of falsehoods is sad Gothmog Apr 2016 #115
You now consider the Inspector General a right wing source? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #117
The Hillary Clinton top-secret email controversy, explained Gothmog Apr 2016 #121
Again, categorically false, per the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #133
Yep, the "Top Secret" Emails Were All About Drones Gothmog Apr 2016 #141
Read post 119 Gothmog Apr 2016 #137
Wishing I could rec your post ... ebayfool Apr 2016 #156
How did you know FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #76
Sticking to the facts is a great idea-why don't you provide the sourcing for your so-called facts? Gothmog Apr 2016 #134
The degree to which TM99 Apr 2016 #51
All one has to do is read this executive order. gordianot Apr 2016 #52
It's complicated, especially for those of us who don't have the training. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #54
Simple enough you need a government server not one in your basement. gordianot Apr 2016 #55
Kick azmom Apr 2016 #28
K&R TheDormouse Apr 2016 #31
Thank you and misspelling fixed! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #32
this needs to be a campaign flier amborin Apr 2016 #40
Bernie has been keeping well clear of it, as he ought (in my opinion). IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #63
I'm ready for it to wrap up. Surely they have enough of whatever they're looking for. Let's do this! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #43
Does non-techy-people include those who can't do a bank transfer? snooper2 Apr 2016 #46
Well, we know she didn't set up the system -- IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #47
To her defense she doesn't have a bunch of common sense, most people don't snooper2 Apr 2016 #49
Truth! Most people think the IT team is just MEAN - IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #50
She wanted a custom ultra secure BlackBerry like Barak's and they would not give her one. gordianot Apr 2016 #56
Who does he think he is? frylock Apr 2016 #82
Maybe She Bought In To Lifelock And Thought... global1 Apr 2016 #59
O. M. G. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #66
Hillary Clinton didn't break the law Gothmog Apr 2016 #107
Thank you and bookmarking :) - Hillary's Email Scandal for Non-Techy People nt slipslidingaway Apr 2016 #48
in case you bernie people missed it.. chillfactor Apr 2016 #53
Bernie people have been listening to that refrain for a year now. frylock Apr 2016 #85
K&R TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #57
.... rbrnmw Apr 2016 #58
Thank you for sharing this! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #60
this one is my alarm every morning rbrnmw Apr 2016 #62
Truthfully, I have a different preference for Frank... IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #65
Dean Martin was fine rbrnmw Apr 2016 #153
I've seen a number of videos on this and this looks like a great job. . . THANKS! pdsimdars Apr 2016 #71
Seriously, I looked through the comments and there were ZERO thanking you pdsimdars Apr 2016 #73
Thanks for this (NT) jack_krass Apr 2016 #74
Hillary, please withdraw, and WITHDRAW NOW!!! Herman4747 Apr 2016 #78
3 counts already set WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #91
Welcome to DU rbrnmw Apr 2016 #95
Thanx very much WhenTheLeveeBreaks Apr 2016 #98
The OP is sad and is full of falsehoods Gothmog Apr 2016 #96
I gave an explanation of why that number was used because it came IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #106
The fact that you are not disclosing your sourcing is all anyone needs to reject this sad OP Gothmog Apr 2016 #110
Here's the thing - I have sources for ALL of the claims. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #131
I like complicated which which is why I sourced each and every one of my posts Gothmog Apr 2016 #135
Parsing your sentence: IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #142
There was never any doubt about you not being a lawyer Gothmog Apr 2016 #150
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #113
The lack of culpable mental state renders the sad attempts at analysis false Gothmog Apr 2016 #111
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #116
You are wrong Gothmog Apr 2016 #119
You Are In Denial... CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #125
Government Officials: None Of The Emails Were Marked As "Classified" When They Were Sent. Gothmog Apr 2016 #130
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #144
The facts and the law are against your claim Gothmog Apr 2016 #146
My favorite part of your position is how you trust IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #165
The fact that you have no sourcing for your silly and false claims is sad but amusing Gothmog Apr 2016 #171
Sigh. You *must* be a lawyer - you ignore any answer you don't like. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #177
Thanks for the concise and readable post. I spent Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #118
Guccifer took screen shots/made copies of Hillary & Sidney Blumenthal's email. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #166
Yes, it helps a lot. What a bizarre twist to an already convoluted Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #182
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #122
The claims about Sec. Powell are false Gothmog Apr 2016 #126
Condoleezza Rice Aides, Colin Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Emails Gothmog Apr 2016 #127
Powell, Rice received sensitive info through private emails Gothmog Apr 2016 #128
Chapter Two: Intent and Design grasswire Apr 2016 #147
The fact is, "Hillary Clinton" is not being investigated by the FBI. George II Apr 2016 #148
Ida, as a fellow mom of twins KMOD Apr 2016 #152
Do you remember Bob_Roony Apr 2016 #155
Here's a good link for more information about it jfern Apr 2016 #162
DU Rec for pissing off the right people. Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #164
What's your source for your asserted facts? nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #167
Many of them are already listed in the comments (Wikipedia is a favorite). IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #169
You posted this without sources? nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #170
From the Original Post - IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #175
No....it doesn't make sense to post OPs without sources. nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #179
Welcome to a Discussion Board, where everyone is free to voice an opinion. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #180
Indeed...without citation you've merely expressed an opinion. nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #181
It's not the emails, per se. It's her refusal to comply with subpoenas. mainer Apr 2016 #168
To clarify, the subpoenas were from the committees investigating stuff. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #172
Thanks for clarification. mainer Apr 2016 #173
Do you have a link for this silly but amusing claim Gothmog Apr 2016 #190
I don't know why I am bothering. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #191
"Hillary can give her delegates to someone else"? NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #186
Yes. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #192
This makes me smile Gothmog Jul 2016 #197
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's Email Scandal f...»Reply #48