Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:35 AM Apr 2016

Fossil fuels - Sanders 4 100ths of 1%, Clinton 15 100ths of 1% of total donations. [View all]

"Totally bogus charge against Hillary Clinton" says Mark Shields.

Sorry that I couldn't paste "URL at current time". It defaults to the start, but go to 39:17 for the Democratic discussion.

?t=2363
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That is a lie... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #1
You do know that a politician doesn't control these PACs? Arneoker Apr 2016 #4
Yeah, there's no backchannel coordination at all... rofl nt revbones Apr 2016 #52
lol SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #54
You really should read up on campaign finance laws. It would be very helpful. George II Apr 2016 #41
Some here suffer from CDS. grossproffit Apr 2016 #42
I hear that's very similar to what many suffered right after Jan 20, 2009 - ODS. The cure is..... George II Apr 2016 #43
You do know that Sanders has SuperPacs & Dark Money too. LOL! KittyWampus Apr 2016 #44
Oh fucking horseshit. TM99 Apr 2016 #53
Did Hillary lose her SuperPACs? DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #2
Candidates don't "have" super PACs Recursion Apr 2016 #6
Trevor Potter, Jon Stewart, and Steven Colbert had a great series on that.... think Apr 2016 #8
More obfuscating... You know exactly what is implied... nt GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #9
What we are saying is that BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #22
Do you honestly not understand how this works? Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #11
I clearly do, unlike 99% of the board Recursion Apr 2016 #13
So it is option b Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #14
Do you think a person as smart as Hillary can work around that? immoderate Apr 2016 #28
I thought they found an internet loophole for coordination and were exploiting it ??? dreamnightwind Apr 2016 #50
She does a LOT of illegal shit... AzDar Apr 2016 #26
You really believe that, don't you? Recursion Apr 2016 #29
Amazing what 25+ years of Lying, Cheating and Stealing will do to your 'reputation'... AzDar Apr 2016 #32
Has the Sanders campaign responded to the FEC about the unreported ten million dollars yet? Koinos Apr 2016 #46
Oh that's very naive. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #60
The case that allowed Super PACs was speechnow.org, not Citizens United Recursion Apr 2016 #61
So naive and condescending? DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #62
Really? Cause it sounds to me like he's gone pretty far off the reservation (nt) Recursion Apr 2016 #63
Naive, condescending and ironic DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #64
Of course Arneoker Apr 2016 #3
"Totally bogus charge against Hillary Clinton" Dem2 Apr 2016 #5
These are the kind of "artful smears" Hillary was talking about. Adrahil Apr 2016 #7
Bernie Sanders makes me puke. n/t cosmicone Apr 2016 #10
If so WHY NOT just accept the Greenpeace pledge? Armstead Apr 2016 #12
Why even care? Arneoker Apr 2016 #15
Because it is is an example of why nothing positive happens in DC Armstead Apr 2016 #16
That's awfully naive Arneoker Apr 2016 #18
It's a step in the right direction Armstead Apr 2016 #20
Even with all of these obstacles progress can be made Arneoker Apr 2016 #19
What defeatist bullshit. You probably think "nothing good" has happened in the past 8 years, too Recursion Apr 2016 #30
The last 8 years have been a very mixed bag Armstead Apr 2016 #33
Obama's administration has been more successful and consequential than Reagan's or LBJ's Recursion Apr 2016 #34
Why doesn't Sanders? He's gotten more money from Oil/Gas than Trump. KittyWampus Apr 2016 #45
He has taken that pledge Armstead Apr 2016 #49
Campaigns don't "accept money from...PACs" LAS14 Apr 2016 #17
Sanders needs to walk back the vitriol now and apologize. n/t cosmicone Apr 2016 #21
Another Sanders artful smear, if he put as much time into campaign strategy as he did sophistry then uponit7771 Apr 2016 #23
I saw that last night--he basically called the guy a massive honking liar. MADem Apr 2016 #24
Thank you riversedge Apr 2016 #25
K&R mcar Apr 2016 #27
K&R HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #31
K&R. kstewart33 Apr 2016 #35
K&R Alfresco Apr 2016 #36
It's all in the packaging, like in most advertisements. While small, HRC is 375% more than SBS. nt TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #37
Thank you! betsuni Apr 2016 #38
K & R Nonhlanhla Apr 2016 #39
K&R SharonClark Apr 2016 #40
You forgot the superpacs supporting her, and why big oil donates to them. Also her "charity." Scuba Apr 2016 #47
K&R! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #48
$4.5 million is what I heard dreamnightwind Apr 2016 #51
I will tell you they're not co-ordinating. It's illegal... LAS14 Apr 2016 #56
Sorry I don't believe you. - eom dreamnightwind Apr 2016 #58
It doesn't matter that they are not coordinating. The support still exists. lostnfound Apr 2016 #59
Great post Gothmog Apr 2016 #55
Sanders' ramped up lies about Hillary show his desperation. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #57
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fossil fuels - Sanders 4 ...»Reply #0