2016 Postmortem

Kaleva

(36,403 posts)

14. The people demanding release of the transcripts have no intention of voting for her

Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:55 AM

Mar 2016

How many Bernie supporters would switch their support to Hillary if she released the transcripts? Zero?

About the only people interested in the transcripts are those who never did and never will support Hillary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There is no excuse for HRC to NOT release the transcripts. [View all] Ken Burch Mar 2016 OP

Bernie's losing. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #1

Hillary's supporters don't care about corruption. w4rma Mar 2016 #2

If that were actually true, wouldn't he be winning now? Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #6

Independents are now 40% of the electorate, and Sanders is winning them at the 70% level n/t eridani Mar 2016 #10

You are wrong!!! The Independents are 42% of the electorate! pdsimdars Mar 2016 #17

OK, I rounded it off. So sue me! n/t eridani Mar 2016 #39

I was just being funny. . . . pushing that last 2% into their faces pdsimdars Mar 2016 #41

Sill waiting for proof of quid pro quo redstateblues Mar 2016 #30

It has nothing to do with how the primaries are going. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #4

It has EVERYTHING to do .. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #49

In other words, you acknowledge that if she releases them she would lose. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #16

What are you ON about? NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #38

It's called logic. . . look into it. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #42

I posted "Bernie is losing." NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #43

And Hillary can't win the general election basselope Mar 2016 #44

And if you post that ... NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #48

My posting it doesn't make it true or false.. it is true b/c she can't win. basselope Mar 2016 #51

I'm sure you can prove it with an Etch-a-Sketch. n/t NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #52

I've proved it several times. basselope Mar 2016 #53

Oh, yes, of course. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #54

You know it is true. basselope Mar 2016 #55

Oh come on now, lot's of excuses CBGLuthier Mar 2016 #3

Fact is Solid Snake1 Mar 2016 #5

I remember waiting for Romney to release his tax returns pugetres Mar 2016 #7

"She cannot adjust anything after the fact in the case of her speeches" GummyBearz Mar 2016 #25

I remember waiting for Nixon to release his tapes Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #40

Unrec. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #8

Thanks for the bump! Segami Mar 2016 #9

Well, no excuse that doesn't reek of mere political calculation. Orsino Mar 2016 #11

She doesn't need an "excuse". Nobody cares except some far-lefties on the internet. DanTex Mar 2016 #12

Nobody here is a "far-lefty". Ken Burch Mar 2016 #20

I beg to differ. Anyone who can't tell the huge difference between HRC and Trump is a far lefty. DanTex Mar 2016 #23

Even in the absolute best case for her jfern Mar 2016 #13

The people demanding release of the transcripts have no intention of voting for her Kaleva Mar 2016 #14

Voters want to know who they are voting for pdsimdars Mar 2016 #18

Like I said, the only people who care about this are those who won't vote for Hillary... Kaleva Mar 2016 #24

is there anything about her that you question? SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #47

Sure there is. . . she will definitely lose if she releasese them. . . otherwise she might only lose pdsimdars Mar 2016 #15

She's not stonewalling on this BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #19

Just like Lady Gaga and Jerry Seinfeld, right? randome Mar 2016 #26

Everyone knows how influential Lady Gaga and Jerry Seinfeld are in world politics. frylock Mar 2016 #35

My point is that these kind of speeches are routine for GS. randome Mar 2016 #50

still no poof of quid pro quo-still waiting redstateblues Mar 2016 #31

There is no reason for Clinton to release transcripts. seabeyond Mar 2016 #21

She's waiting for the Repukes to lead the way Lone_Wolf Mar 2016 #22

No one cares about speech transcripts, except for Sanders supporters Tarc Mar 2016 #27

This dead horse is never going to run faster. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #28

This late in the game, I couldn't care less about the transcripts. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #29

How about she doesn't need to because Bernie's over? Gomez163 Mar 2016 #32

Right, because secret promises to Wall Street are what we progressives demand of presidents. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #34

No. The race is over. Hillary does not have to answer to him Gomez163 Mar 2016 #36

Nor us either, apparently. nt lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #37

Yeah, Clinton doesn't have to answer to ANYONE. basselope Mar 2016 #46

She doesn't have "excuses", she has *reasons*. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #33

What Clinton fails to grasp is that the speeches will be released basselope Mar 2016 #45

She saving them for the general election! Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #56

She's not an idiot Onlooker Mar 2016 #57