2016 Postmortem

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts) Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:16 AM Mar 2016

There is no excuse for HRC to NOT release the transcripts. [View all]

And it isn't strength for her to stonewall on this.

It's the RIGHT that does secrecy...we're supposed to be transparent.

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There is no excuse for HRC to NOT release the transcripts. [View all] Ken Burch Mar 2016 OP

Bernie's losing. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #1

Hillary's supporters don't care about corruption. w4rma Mar 2016 #2

If that were actually true, wouldn't he be winning now? Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #6

Independents are now 40% of the electorate, and Sanders is winning them at the 70% level n/t eridani Mar 2016 #10

You are wrong!!! The Independents are 42% of the electorate! pdsimdars Mar 2016 #17

OK, I rounded it off. So sue me! n/t eridani Mar 2016 #39

I was just being funny. . . . pushing that last 2% into their faces pdsimdars Mar 2016 #41

Sill waiting for proof of quid pro quo redstateblues Mar 2016 #30

It has nothing to do with how the primaries are going. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #4

It has EVERYTHING to do .. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #49

In other words, you acknowledge that if she releases them she would lose. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #16

What are you ON about? NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #38

It's called logic. . . look into it. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #42

I posted "Bernie is losing." NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #43

And Hillary can't win the general election basselope Mar 2016 #44

And if you post that ... NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #48

My posting it doesn't make it true or false.. it is true b/c she can't win. basselope Mar 2016 #51

I'm sure you can prove it with an Etch-a-Sketch. n/t NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #52

I've proved it several times. basselope Mar 2016 #53

Oh, yes, of course. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #54

You know it is true. basselope Mar 2016 #55

Oh come on now, lot's of excuses CBGLuthier Mar 2016 #3

Fact is Solid Snake1 Mar 2016 #5

I remember waiting for Romney to release his tax returns pugetres Mar 2016 #7

"She cannot adjust anything after the fact in the case of her speeches" GummyBearz Mar 2016 #25

I remember waiting for Nixon to release his tapes Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #40

Unrec. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #8

Thanks for the bump! Segami Mar 2016 #9

Well, no excuse that doesn't reek of mere political calculation. Orsino Mar 2016 #11

She doesn't need an "excuse". Nobody cares except some far-lefties on the internet. DanTex Mar 2016 #12

Nobody here is a "far-lefty". Ken Burch Mar 2016 #20

I beg to differ. Anyone who can't tell the huge difference between HRC and Trump is a far lefty. DanTex Mar 2016 #23

Even in the absolute best case for her jfern Mar 2016 #13

The people demanding release of the transcripts have no intention of voting for her Kaleva Mar 2016 #14

Voters want to know who they are voting for pdsimdars Mar 2016 #18

Like I said, the only people who care about this are those who won't vote for Hillary... Kaleva Mar 2016 #24

is there anything about her that you question? SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #47

Sure there is. . . she will definitely lose if she releasese them. . . otherwise she might only lose pdsimdars Mar 2016 #15

She's not stonewalling on this BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #19

Just like Lady Gaga and Jerry Seinfeld, right? randome Mar 2016 #26

Everyone knows how influential Lady Gaga and Jerry Seinfeld are in world politics. frylock Mar 2016 #35

My point is that these kind of speeches are routine for GS. randome Mar 2016 #50

still no poof of quid pro quo-still waiting redstateblues Mar 2016 #31

There is no reason for Clinton to release transcripts. seabeyond Mar 2016 #21

She's waiting for the Repukes to lead the way Lone_Wolf Mar 2016 #22

No one cares about speech transcripts, except for Sanders supporters Tarc Mar 2016 #27

This dead horse is never going to run faster. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #28

This late in the game, I couldn't care less about the transcripts. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #29

How about she doesn't need to because Bernie's over? Gomez163 Mar 2016 #32

Right, because secret promises to Wall Street are what we progressives demand of presidents. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #34

No. The race is over. Hillary does not have to answer to him Gomez163 Mar 2016 #36

Nor us either, apparently. nt lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #37

Yeah, Clinton doesn't have to answer to ANYONE. basselope Mar 2016 #46

She doesn't have "excuses", she has *reasons*. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #33

What Clinton fails to grasp is that the speeches will be released basselope Mar 2016 #45

She saving them for the general election! Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #56

She's not an idiot Onlooker Mar 2016 #57