Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 03:08 PM Feb 2016

If the 22nd amendment had been repealed, who would you choose for the nominee? [View all]

Assuming that the nominee would face a well-funded Republican nominee with their full arsenal of gutter tactics, and that the nominee would have to show the ability to defeat the Republican to get anything done.


20 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
President Obama--four more years!
5 (25%)
Bernie Sanders--time for a revolution.
14 (70%)
Hillary Clinton--she will fight for you.
1 (5%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
although if not for 22, there would not be clinton and sanders.....nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #1
I think Bill was done after the Lewinsky thing no matter what. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #2
oh, most definitely. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #5
Agreer but would have liked to see his numer up there Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #22
I wanted to click "Obama" but knowing he's pretty much had enough, I didn't. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #3
you're splitting the Obama / Clinton vote wyldwolf Feb 2016 #4
I prefer Sanders to Clinton but would take Obama over both in a heartbeat. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #6
The last five presidents were supply-siders. We have to break the chain. immoderate Feb 2016 #7
Obama is not a supply sider nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #8
Baked into our system! immoderate Feb 2016 #13
^This Bernie over all of the op choices. JRLeft Feb 2016 #16
The 22nd amendment should only be repealed once Bernie Sanders becomes POTUS. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #9
Obama has been rather outspoken in opposing Citizens United. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #10
Yes and we need much more than that now..much more. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #11
what we need is always more than what we can get nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #12
We need someone who is not a recipient of said monies, that person is best placed Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #14
Sanders hasn't taken punches from the Republicans on his tax increases. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #15
They've been singing that same song for the last 40 years...Obama still won x2. Sanders resonates Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #17
Obama also said "you can keep your insurance" and promised to not raise taxes geek tragedy Feb 2016 #18
Every candidate has their message and the GOP is in the bag for the elite and ONLY the elite. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #19
As I've said in earlier places, both are subpar candidates. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #20
Sanders has his weaknesses but I don't think we agree on what those are. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #21
most milennials aren't tuning in to this race. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #23
We'll see how the ONES that are involved react, and I would suggest that anyone Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #24
no doubt Clinton has glaring weaknesses like that geek tragedy Feb 2016 #25
Being the underdog is tough and a Brock campaign against you is even harder. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #26
there is no easy sell available to either party nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If the 22nd amendment had...»Reply #0