Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)

19. You mean these guy specifically

Reply to DrDan (Reply #18)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 05:08 PM

Sep 2012

Last edited Tue Sep 11, 2012, 07:51 PM - Edit history (1)

Could be. There might be some Log Cabin greed heads among them. Then again, if they can get enough Ron Paul tea baggers excited about their guy over Mitt, it works for us.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alternatives to the NRA [View all] GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 OP

like the NRA, I assume all of these listed are working toward the defeat of Obama DrDan Sep 2012 #1

How open-minded of you! slackmaster Sep 2012 #2

I also do not visit FR - does that make me closed-minded as well? DrDan Sep 2012 #4

Today's lesson in fruit identification... slackmaster Sep 2012 #8

and your point is . . . DrDan Sep 2012 #12

None of those sites is Free Republic slackmaster Sep 2012 #21

I NEVER said that - I said I assumed they supported the defeat of Obama, like the NRA DrDan Sep 2012 #22

That assumption is correct. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #5

I don't picture gejohnston Sep 2012 #7

Likely not, but at the local level they might make a few votes difference. N/T GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #11

they supported the Libertarian candidate in 2004 DrDan Sep 2012 #13

How so? gejohnston Sep 2012 #14

they endorsed an other-than-Democratic candidate - thereby working for the defeat of Kerry in 2004 DrDan Sep 2012 #15

I understand what you are saying gejohnston Sep 2012 #16

I can only assume that if not voting for the Libertarian, they would vote D DrDan Sep 2012 #18

You mean these guy specifically gejohnston Sep 2012 #19

who knows how they would vote otherwise - not me DrDan Sep 2012 #20

How delightfully biased of you ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #26

see post #5 DrDan Sep 2012 #29

I think a good alternative to the NRA would be 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #3

Sorry. I forgot to include my point. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #6

So you're saying the NRA is the lesser of all evils? rl6214 Sep 2012 #9

They would have to go somewhere. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #10

What's so radical about SAF? Glaug-Eldare Sep 2012 #17

SAF funded Heller, NRA was against it until very late in the game. N/T GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #24

How is that radical? Travis_0004 Sep 2012 #27

The SAF was willing to gamble. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #28

"the NRA is too radial" Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #23

lol Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #25