Gun Control & RKBA

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)

43. Neither "toting" nor "assault rifles" are the focus of this thread

Sun May 27, 2012, 06:46 PM

May 2012

Last edited Mon May 28, 2012, 01:53 AM - Edit history (1)

The pictured rifles are, by CA definition, not "assault weapons," and rifles are very rarely carried, anyway. I assume long gun carry is illegal in California, but I could be wrong.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Colt Offers Two New California-Legal Carbines [View all] Johnny Rico May 2012 OP

Very nice product for a market the richly deserves it. ileus May 2012 #1

With all the problems in the world, who needs such a rifle? And, who really cares it's available? Hoyt May 2012 #2

Couldn't you use that argument against almost anything? Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #3

Computers aren't guns. Do you consider strutting down the street with a gun a "hobby?" Hoyt May 2012 #4

You do realize that it is a target rifle? ProgressiveProfessor May 2012 #6

Not a "hobby" SGMRTDARMY May 2012 #12

You're back. "Welcome." Whatyaneed to defend yourself from on city streets? Hoyt May 2012 #13

I'm back? SGMRTDARMY May 2012 #14

Some people in California appear to need it, otherwise Colt wouldn't be marketing it. Johnny Rico May 2012 #5

Hoyt's schtick only "works" through his ignorance. PavePusher May 2012 #10

"All the problems in the world" . . . isn't that an argument for needing a rifle? DanM May 2012 #8

What does all the problems in the world have to do with AR's in Ca? ileus May 2012 #16

Probably a real Meiko May 2012 #7

Seems to use the bullet button like everyone else. ManiacJoe May 2012 #9

Well, at least it doesn't look like these Californicated abominations: Johnny Rico May 2012 #11

It's clear that CA gun laws violate the FIRST Amendment... friendly_iconoclast May 2012 #15

If the CA AWB is succesfully overturned... -..__... May 2012 #17

Gun companies just won't accept the message... ellisonz May 2012 #18

if it was the will of the people gejohnston May 2012 #19

Why do you insist upon... ellisonz May 2012 #21

they are ignorant on this issue gejohnston May 2012 #23

How can you possibly call any CA-legal gun an "assault weapon?" Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #22

The "will of the people"... -..__... May 2012 #24

The former is a clear issue of the 14th Amendment... ellisonz May 2012 #25

how so? gejohnston May 2012 #26

I think he meant drug laws are a criminal issue n/t Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #27

Since you want to talk about MS13... ellisonz May 2012 #28

Saw enough of them in California gejohnston May 2012 #31

I'm sorry, but white supremacists/militia-nut/sovereign citizens types... ellisonz May 2012 #33

actually I can gejohnston May 2012 #36

I wouldn't deny that... ellisonz May 2012 #37

why should I admit to something that is not true? gejohnston May 2012 #38

It's not a "clear issue"... -..__... May 2012 #29

So take it to court... ellisonz May 2012 #34

Then why haven't they passed a law against them? Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #39

Please stop saying "we" in your comments related to CA. TIA. petronius May 2012 #40

So Colt obeying California law is spitting in their face? Really? nt hack89 May 2012 #45

"we don't wan't..." How very royal of you. friendly_iconoclast May 2012 #46

Will of the people? Clames May 2012 #30

It's when you compare... ellisonz May 2012 #35

And when you have nothing left but labels... Clames May 2012 #42

That's exactly the comparison you made... ellisonz May 2012 #49

"tote" = "own" ? Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #51

Insinuating? Clames May 2012 #54

It's the will of the people when it's Constitutional... ellisonz May 2012 #57

Freedom's good, whether regarding arms or marriage. Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #58

I've never insisted on what you assert. Clames May 2012 #59

Neither "toting" nor "assault rifles" are the focus of this thread Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #43

What does this thread have to do with assault rifles? Johnny Rico May 2012 #44

I see you have your dancing shoes on. n/t ellisonz May 2012 #50

That's rather amusing, given that you didn't address my point. Johnny Rico May 2012 #55

That's twice you've called firearms that aren't assault rifles "assault rifles". friendly_iconoclast May 2012 #47

Probably both in his case. Clames May 2012 #48

anything that's not a single shot or bolt action is an assault weapon. ileus May 2012 #52

Sophistry noted sylvi May 2012 #56

Sounds like gun companies hear a different tune... ileus May 2012 #32

A firearm is either classified as an AW under California law, or not an AW. slackmaster May 2012 #53

This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon May 2012 #20

Necessity is The Mother of Invention Tuesday Afternoon May 2012 #41