Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

William Seger

(10,775 posts)

7. But it was their TV media critic

Reply to KelleyKramer (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 31, 2019, 08:09 AM

Mar 2019

... who admitted she hasn't been watching Maddow for years and only tuned in this week, apparently only to see if Maddow was properly humiliated and contrite. In her ignorance, she believes the right-wing propaganda version of Maddow as a Glen Beck-like conspiracy theorist and was faux-appalled that Maddow was still talking about all the stuff we still don't know, accusing her of desperately clinging to her debunked conspiracy theories. She also apparently agrees with Trump that TV ratings are the measure of all things important, and was self-satisfied that Maddow's ratings dropped this week while Hannity's rose.

Crappy articles like that are why Slate's reputation has gone so far downhill.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Insanity of Democrats Attacking Buttigieg--for Not Being Gay Enough [View all] Behind the Aegis Mar 2019 OP

Slate just ran a hit piece on Rachel Maddow KelleyKramer Mar 2019 #1

But it was their TV media critic William Seger Mar 2019 #7

My point is, Slate hit piece is not 'Democrats' attacking Pete KelleyKramer Mar 2019 #17

The Slate article referenced in the OP ... William Seger Mar 2019 #20

Buttigieg himself said that he wants to see a day where it won't matter. LuvNewcastle Mar 2019 #2

It better not become a media wedge into 2020 or I'll be SO pissed with the any purity gang. ancianita Mar 2019 #3

For Pete's sake! sandensea Mar 2019 #4

"Yet some Liberal voices...." luvtheGWN Mar 2019 #6

It is all fun and games, watoos Mar 2019 #5

I think the criticisms of BS & Gabbard are ideological & party, not personal. Honeycombe8 Mar 2019 #11

You always have such a great way of making the points so easy to see. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #13

I don't think of this as infighting WhiteTara Mar 2019 #18

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #8

Not insufficient liberal purity TheFarseer Mar 2019 #15

(sigh!) "Nothing-But-The-Best-For-The-Oppressed" DinahMoeHum Mar 2019 #9

The lack of tolerance among some alleged Democrats is appalling Evolve Dammit Mar 2019 #10

The Democratic party is becoming ridiculous . You MUST "check all the boxes" PROPERLY to qualify! oldsoftie Mar 2019 #12

Are you sure that was the Democratic party doing it and not the repub trolls? Perseus Mar 2019 #14

You dont recall the open criticism of Barack Obama not being "black enough"? oldsoftie Mar 2019 #19

A twitter troll or two are now "some liberal voices?" OneBro Mar 2019 #16

Perfectly said, they can't resist attacking their own. I guess it's OK to attack Pete though pdsimdars Mar 2019 #21

For me it has never been about which boxes they check off, it's who they are and their ideas. pdsimdars Mar 2019 #22

"Straight acting"? A pet peeve of mine. Odoreida Apr 2019 #23