The Insanity of Democrats Attacking Buttigieg--for Not Being Gay Enough [View all]
After weeks of glowing press coverage of Pete Buttigieg as hes shot up in the Democratic 2020 field, the Petes Not Perfect posse has kicked into high gear with an unusually personal criticism: Buttigieg, they say, isnt gay enough.
Is Pete Buttigieg just another white male candidate, or does his gayness count as diversity? Slate asked in the headline (since changed) of a much discussed piece this week by staff writer Christina Cauterucci.
The fact that the press and political class are even taking Buttigiegs candidacy seriously is a historic first. An openly gay candidate has never qualified for a presidential debate, let alone become president (the jury is still out on James Buchanan, but whatever his orientation, he wasnt leading any Pride parades in 1857).
Yet some liberal voices are now discounting Buttigiegs sexual orientation (still a white man), or at least diminishing the historic discrimination gays have faced as compared with women and people of color (most of the time gender and race are way heavier burdens than sexual orientation in the professional and political environment, and there was a time when it was illegal for us to marry interracially, women and POC could not even own property but a gay white man could). For those critics, his race and gender negate the little credit they accord him for being gay.
All of this seems like an attempt to write Buttigieg off as just another white guy, standing in the way of more diverse candidates. Its the Oppression Olympics at its worst: In a battle to prove that one community is more discriminated against than another, we tear each other apart rather than unite in common cause.
more...