Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
48. You don't know that. It's what Hamas is all about...
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 08:48 AM
Jul 2013

Last edited Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:33 AM - Edit history (1)

Hamas and Islamic Jihad don't want to simply rule in peace, get jobs for the people, etc. Their main purpose is to attack Israel, and with the rest of the so-called "progressive" world and Arab regimes backing them (hundreds of millions) they believe they have the long-term advantage over tiny Israel. They're not going to stop attacking Israel b/c if they did, they'd cease being Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

What it really comes down to is that you believe that that maintaining the Occupation and continuing to build what you know are illegal settlements in the West Bank(none of which are being built in areas that Israel could ever have more legitimate claim to than Palestine does, btw)are the only possible choices. You think the hard line actually helps.


That's bullshit and not what I believe at all. I'm like most from the moderate left to moderate right, for 2 states so long as it means peace. If there was yet another pullout before peace could be reached, I'm certain Israel's enemies would attack it again & again if given the chance. That said, after turning the keys over to the Palestinians and many wars and thousands of lives later, Israel would just have to re-occupy the territories once again to stop it. So what would be the point of pulling out early if it means having to re-occupy once again? If they don't re-occupy, they'd have to REALLY do so much damage that their neighbors wouldn't dare attack again. These options are worse than the status-quo, so why go there?

So you are automatically going to dismiss any alternative proposals(unless they come from the insane Israeli right...like those crazies you keep quoting who still pretend that "Jordan is the Palestinian state"-something Jordan never has been and could never possibly be), which makes it problematic to carry on any discussion or debate with you at all.


Actually, over 50% of Palestinians support a confederation with Jordan post-occupation.
http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2013/p48e.html

Are they rightwing crazies? Apparently, everyone who doesn't agree with Ken Burch is a rightwing crazy.

And, in fact, it often appears that your only reason for posting here is to try to badger or demonize anybody who disagrees with you into ceasing to post.


That's what you do, assigning the worst motives and viewpoints to your opponents here.

All I ask for here is an honest debate. It's about time you're being honest now about your views on free speech and favoring regressive, anti-liberal dictators and tyrants over western democracies. It only took years to pull that out of you.
the reality.....never a strong point for the far right and left pelsar Jun 2013 #1
The author, Martin Sherman, is against 2 states too... shira Jun 2013 #2
of course hes got a point.... pelsar Jun 2013 #3
progressives don't deserve to be on that list. Ken Burch Jun 2013 #5
You can't demand that the democratic change in the PA happen while the Occupation continues. Ken Burch Jun 2013 #6
What's your plan B if the solution you prefer fails? n/t shira Jun 2013 #8
Keep trying, and find some way to get people talking. Ken Burch Jun 2013 #10
No, no...I'm asking what's your plan B when your solution fails? shira Jul 2013 #17
So you have no plan B, right? n/t shira Jul 2013 #27
Asking for a "Plan B" is meaningless. I'm not OBLIGATED to have a "Plan B". Ken Burch Jul 2013 #31
So if by some chance, after LOTS of negotiations & Israel doing everything.... shira Jul 2013 #38
That wouldn't happen. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #39
You don't know that. It's what Hamas is all about... shira Jul 2013 #48
I support free speech and you know it. I oppose tyrants and you know it. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #50
But you supported a tyrant like Chavez who was against free speech. n/t shira Jul 2013 #57
I didn't agree with his decision to take the rich man's station off the cable network Ken Burch Jul 2013 #58
Chavez brutally suppressed free speech far worse than just that... shira Jul 2013 #64
Human Rights Watch is not a reliable source on human rights issues. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #65
Your defense of Chavez speaks volumes. And HRW routinely hammers Israel.... shira Jul 2013 #66
The question of having a "Plan B" is meaningless. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #32
Jordan? pelsar Jul 2013 #12
Societies that don't respect basic civil rights AREN'T acceptable. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #13
i believe in self interest.... pelsar Jul 2013 #15
Democracy only came out of POSTWAR occupations, not thing kind your army is doing. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #21
you live in a real fantasy world...that much is certain... pelsar Jul 2013 #49
So, in the end, it appears that you're still accepting all of the following old assumptions: Ken Burch Jul 2013 #54
is it inaccurate?..of course pelsar Jul 2013 #55
I have never said it wasn't a good thing that Israel exists. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #56
this is an example why you don't dislike dictators.... pelsar Jul 2013 #67
Not the dictator mentality at all. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #68
We know by now ...... pelsar Jul 2013 #69
Burch is part of the Totalitarian Left, which is what the Euston Manifesto opposes shira Jul 2013 #75
I see all sorts of shades of grey(although I'm going to resist saying the number "Fifty") Ken Burch Jul 2013 #89
Your #65 shows you support totalitarian rule... shira Jul 2013 #93
It's a despicable lie to say I'm promoting a theocratic anti-civil rights government Ken Burch Jul 2013 #23
i cant think of many reasons..... pelsar Jul 2013 #70
I can believe that it could and probably would have different values Ken Burch Jul 2013 #71
its doesnt make sense to you... pelsar Jul 2013 #72
Your interpretation the Egyptian and Gazan votes was simply too sweeping Ken Burch Jul 2013 #73
nope....you dont get to make conclusions pelsar Jul 2013 #74
That only applied to POSTWAR occupations. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #76
seems you missed the question... pelsar Jul 2013 #77
The occupations after world war II didn't PRODUCE democracy. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #78
i forgot ...you believe in the tooth fairly. pelsar Jul 2013 #79
It had nothing to with submitting to U.S. domination. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #80
ah....After the war, the people saw the truth on their own pelsar Jul 2013 #81
The only other common point was military victory by one side over the other. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #82
thats not called research..... pelsar Jul 2013 #83
Education about democracy also occurred-but the success of that Ken Burch Jul 2013 #85
a better system pelsar Jul 2013 #86
I change my conclusions with learning as well. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #88
baby steps.... pelsar Jul 2013 #91
I never said Palestinians are "limited" and you know it. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #92
i dont twist your word... i just interpret them.... pelsar Jul 2013 #97
Democracy emerged in India in SPITE of the British Empire(the occupiers there) Ken Burch Jul 2013 #98
i never said it cant happen... pelsar Jul 2013 #99
You aren't talking about Israel, dude. delrem Jul 2013 #100
pay attention.... pelsar Jul 2013 #102
I think everyone who has a lick of common sense delrem Jul 2013 #106
thats why your "common sense" has no meaning pelsar Jul 2013 #107
I will accept the above statements as pelsar's full response, delrem Jul 2013 #108
thats what i like about this place..... pelsar Jul 2013 #109
You're not entitled to talk down to people. Stop it already. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #110
1: its called freedom of speach: 2: you do it as well 3: its called tolerance pelsar Jul 2013 #112
The Afrikaaners would have approved of that logic. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #53
I've found that those accusing Israel of Apartheid turn out to be the biggest supporters... shira Jul 2013 #59
Hey, congrats, you've surrendered the possibility of being a Light Unto the Nations, geek tragedy Jul 2013 #60
Exactly my point. You support Apartheid vs. Palestinians throughout the mideast... shira Jul 2013 #63
So, basically, he's against anything that could EVER lead to peace. Ken Burch Jun 2013 #4
I never said I endorsed Sherman's solution shira Jun 2013 #7
Look, democracy's great(although the west doesn't have an exclusive franchise on it Ken Burch Jun 2013 #9
justice? pelsar Jul 2013 #11
It's never. ever been about ME. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #14
Democracy can never be real ???? pelsar Jul 2013 #16
There are a lot of questionable aspects of Japanese "democracy". Ken Burch Jul 2013 #19
What's going on in Egypt isn't democracy. The vast majority still want sharia.... shira Jul 2013 #18
I do believe in helping out seculars and progressives. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #20
But nothing you and yours advocate would help seculars/progressives there... shira Jul 2013 #26
I favor freedom of speech as much as you do. And Chavez DID allow it. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #30
Chavez didn't allow it. Here's HRW on his authoritarian legacy... shira Jul 2013 #40
What's going on in Egypt IS about democracy. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #22
Democracy is about more than just an election... shira Jul 2013 #25
The U.S., at its birth in 1789, was pretty much just as repressive as Hamas is now. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #29
No they weren't. And even if they were, it's 250 years later.... shira Jul 2013 #41
There is no way to get peace, ever, without having 2 states. There is nothing else that can work. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #43
But Hamas and the PLO want more than 2 states... shira Jul 2013 #47
It's telling that you seem to equate "justice" with "barbarity". Ken Burch Jul 2013 #24
wow..is all im gong to say.. pelsar Jul 2013 #33
"Freedom from want" is a phrase coined by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #34
you want zombies... pelsar Jul 2013 #35
Uh, no, I dont want anybody to be a "zombie" Ken Burch Jul 2013 #36
you've made yourself very very clear.... pelsar Jul 2013 #37
Again, I'm not calling for free speech to be delayed. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #42
no..Freedom of speach is not dependent upon anything...zilch pelsar Jul 2013 #44
societies that ONLY have freedom of speech are never societies where the poor ever win. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #45
that makes no sense....because it doesnt exist.... pelsar Jul 2013 #46
Oh, he favors ethnic cleansing. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #52
No more than you do by wanting all 300-500,000 settlers ethnically cleansed... shira Jul 2013 #61
The settlers aren't legitimate residents of the territories. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #84
Bless you for how thoroughly you count the snakes in the pit. delrem Jul 2013 #87
Thanks for the support. Sorry you had to turn off the filters. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #90
silencing debate pelsar Jul 2013 #114
I never said that speech or debate has to be limited Ken Burch Jul 2013 #115
of course i have to right to insult....your good at it pelsar Jul 2013 #116
funny thing with that concept of arbitration Ken Burch Jul 2013 #117
the problem with your censorist* pelsar Jul 2013 #118
criticizing your country's government is not an insult to your family. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #119
first off..i decide if I've been insulted ....not you pelsar Jul 2013 #120
Then kindly tell me what exactly IS insulting to you, your famiily, your "clan" as you see it. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #121
its not about being limited....its about respecting our culture pelsar Jul 2013 #122
I go to the comments sections at Haaretz and other Israeli papers Ken Burch Jul 2013 #123
and they are being very disrespectful..... pelsar Jul 2013 #124
Small point: by birth, you are American Ken Burch Jul 2013 #125
is there a "single' israeli culture... pelsar Jul 2013 #126
I am not insulting towards the Arab countries. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #127
how much of your speech are you willing to give up.... pelsar Jul 2013 #128
But your culture DOESN'T equate criticism of your politicians to insulting them. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #129
so you do want to "shut me up".... pelsar Jul 2013 #130
I am more in agreement with you .... Israeli Jul 2013 #131
Thanks for that, Israeli. n/t. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #132
israeli.... pelsar Jul 2013 #133
pelsar... Israeli Jul 2013 #134
oh that..... pelsar Jul 2013 #135
"playing with him" !!!!!!! Israeli Jul 2013 #136
Jews would be there if they hadn't been ethnically cleansed in 1948 shira Jul 2013 #94
They don't want to live there as Palestinian citizens, though. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #95
How do you know? 10's of thousands of settlers will violently resist... shira Jul 2013 #96
Yes, they will violently resist. Not because they want to live as Palestinian citizens or in peace Ken Burch Jul 2013 #111
What did you think of those links? You're generalizing for all settlers, aren't you? n/t shira Jul 2013 #113
before you answer this : Israeli Jul 2013 #101
I wasn't the one saying they were a small percentage. Shira was. Ken Burch Jul 2013 #103
I know ... Israeli Jul 2013 #105
So how do you account for the articles cited, showing settlers wanting peace.... shira Jul 2013 #104
Well, you know what they say: COLGATE4 Jul 2013 #28
So, the author favors apartheid, since they reject one and two state solutions. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #51
Nah, he's for giving Palestinians citizenship in a 1-state scenario shira Jul 2013 #62
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Into the Fray: Brain dead...»Reply #48