Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Into the Fray: Brain dead on the Right? [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)48. You don't know that. It's what Hamas is all about...
Last edited Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:33 AM - Edit history (1)
Hamas and Islamic Jihad don't want to simply rule in peace, get jobs for the people, etc. Their main purpose is to attack Israel, and with the rest of the so-called "progressive" world and Arab regimes backing them (hundreds of millions) they believe they have the long-term advantage over tiny Israel. They're not going to stop attacking Israel b/c if they did, they'd cease being Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
What it really comes down to is that you believe that that maintaining the Occupation and continuing to build what you know are illegal settlements in the West Bank(none of which are being built in areas that Israel could ever have more legitimate claim to than Palestine does, btw)are the only possible choices. You think the hard line actually helps.
That's bullshit and not what I believe at all. I'm like most from the moderate left to moderate right, for 2 states so long as it means peace. If there was yet another pullout before peace could be reached, I'm certain Israel's enemies would attack it again & again if given the chance. That said, after turning the keys over to the Palestinians and many wars and thousands of lives later, Israel would just have to re-occupy the territories once again to stop it. So what would be the point of pulling out early if it means having to re-occupy once again? If they don't re-occupy, they'd have to REALLY do so much damage that their neighbors wouldn't dare attack again. These options are worse than the status-quo, so why go there?
So you are automatically going to dismiss any alternative proposals(unless they come from the insane Israeli right...like those crazies you keep quoting who still pretend that "Jordan is the Palestinian state"-something Jordan never has been and could never possibly be), which makes it problematic to carry on any discussion or debate with you at all.
Actually, over 50% of Palestinians support a confederation with Jordan post-occupation.
http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2013/p48e.html
Are they rightwing crazies? Apparently, everyone who doesn't agree with Ken Burch is a rightwing crazy.
And, in fact, it often appears that your only reason for posting here is to try to badger or demonize anybody who disagrees with you into ceasing to post.
That's what you do, assigning the worst motives and viewpoints to your opponents here.
All I ask for here is an honest debate. It's about time you're being honest now about your views on free speech and favoring regressive, anti-liberal dictators and tyrants over western democracies. It only took years to pull that out of you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You can't demand that the democratic change in the PA happen while the Occupation continues.
Ken Burch
Jun 2013
#6
I didn't agree with his decision to take the rich man's station off the cable network
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#58
Democracy only came out of POSTWAR occupations, not thing kind your army is doing.
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#21
So, in the end, it appears that you're still accepting all of the following old assumptions:
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#54
Burch is part of the Totalitarian Left, which is what the Euston Manifesto opposes
shira
Jul 2013
#75
I see all sorts of shades of grey(although I'm going to resist saying the number "Fifty")
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#89
It's a despicable lie to say I'm promoting a theocratic anti-civil rights government
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#23
Democracy emerged in India in SPITE of the British Empire(the occupiers there)
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#98
I've found that those accusing Israel of Apartheid turn out to be the biggest supporters...
shira
Jul 2013
#59
Hey, congrats, you've surrendered the possibility of being a Light Unto the Nations,
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
#60
Exactly my point. You support Apartheid vs. Palestinians throughout the mideast...
shira
Jul 2013
#63
Look, democracy's great(although the west doesn't have an exclusive franchise on it
Ken Burch
Jun 2013
#9
What's going on in Egypt isn't democracy. The vast majority still want sharia....
shira
Jul 2013
#18
The U.S., at its birth in 1789, was pretty much just as repressive as Hamas is now.
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#29
There is no way to get peace, ever, without having 2 states. There is nothing else that can work.
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#43
societies that ONLY have freedom of speech are never societies where the poor ever win.
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#45
Then kindly tell me what exactly IS insulting to you, your famiily, your "clan" as you see it.
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#121
But your culture DOESN'T equate criticism of your politicians to insulting them.
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#129
Yes, they will violently resist. Not because they want to live as Palestinian citizens or in peace
Ken Burch
Jul 2013
#111
What did you think of those links? You're generalizing for all settlers, aren't you? n/t
shira
Jul 2013
#113
So how do you account for the articles cited, showing settlers wanting peace....
shira
Jul 2013
#104
So, the author favors apartheid, since they reject one and two state solutions.
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
#51