Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Foreign Affairs
Showing Original Post only (View all)Putin's Power Play in Syria [View all]
This woman has a nice feel for language. The piece itself deserves its own thread, it is unusual to get such a sober assessment from within the DC bubble. There is hardly anything she says that I find it necessary to disagree with, and then it is a matter of views, spin, slant, not of facts.How to Respond to Russias Intervention
---
Once again, Washington has been caught off-guard, just as it was in March 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and began supporting pro-Russian separatists fighting Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine. For all of Russias domestic problemsa shrinking economy, a declining population, and high rates of capital flight and brain drainit has projected a surprising amount of power not only in its neighborhood but also beyond. U.S. President Barack Obama may refer to Russia as a regional power, but Russias military intervention in Syria demonstrates that it once again intends to be accepted as a global actor and play a part in every major international decision. This will be a vexing challenge not only for Obama during his remaining time in office but also for the next occupant of the White House.
Why has Washington been so slow to grasp the new Russian reality? Russian President Vladimir Putin has not kept his agenda a secret. In February 2007, for example, he delivered a scathing critique of U.S. foreign policy at the Munich Security Conference. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way, he warned. Countless times since, Russia has vowed to replace what it sees as a coercive U.S.-led global order with one in which the West respects Russias interests. In retrospect, Russias war with Georgia in August 2008 signaled Moscows willingness to use force to prevent its neighbors from drifting toward the West and to reassert its influence in areas that were formerly part of the Soviet Union. But the United States and its allies have repeatedly underestimated Russias determination to revise the global order that Moscow feels the West has imposed on Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union.
---
Putins intervention in Syria has sent a mixed message. On the one hand, he has blamed the United States for creating the conditions that allowed ISIS to emerge; on the other, he has offered to join the United States in an anti-ISIS coalition. In remarks last October, Putin said, Syria can become a model for partnership in the name of common interests, resolving problems that affect everyone, and developing an effective risk-management system. Yet unlike in Afghanistan in 2001, Moscow and Washington do not agree on the identity of the enemy. Although they both see ISIS as a major threat, Russia has bombed Syrian opposition groups that the United States has supported, and Washington sees Assads rule as a major part of the countrys problems. Thanks to these differences, it will be difficult for Russia and the United States to work together in Syria.
---
GETTING REAL ABOUT RUSSIA
For the remainder of Obamas second term, tensions over Syria and Ukraine will dominate U.S.-Russian relations. The best that can be achieved in Ukraine in the near term is a frozen conflict in which the cease-fire holds even though Kiev remains unable to control the Donbas region and Russia continues to exercise influence there through its proxies. The most the United States is likely to do is continue its modest economic and political support for the Ukrainian government, which is struggling to address systemic problems of corruption and economic disorder. Although some in the U.S. government have argued for more economic and military assistance to Ukraineincluding the provision of lethal defensive weaponsthe White House has consistently refused to do this for fear of further provoking Russia, and it is unlikely to change its policy in 2016.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2015-12-14/putins-power-play-syria
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 3624 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McCain: US should "tolerate a large degree of risk in order to see that this goal" of overthrow
leveymg
Dec 2015
#8
Of course, the intellectual origins of the neocon agenda belong to the Israeli-American RW
leveymg
Dec 2015
#11
"(T)he United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way,” he warned."
Ghost Dog
Dec 2015
#2