Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)

5. Damn right. Eg., no nuclear power station operator is, according to the accounts, insured

Reply to saturnsring (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 09:06 PM

Apr 2016

properly to cover possible cost consequences of serious cockups. Nor is the waste product safe storage &/recycle phase properly costed.

... Not to mention the Security bill...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Germany To Abandon $1.1 Trillion Wind Power Program By 2019 [View all] GliderGuider Apr 2016 OP

Very interesting. LiberalArkie Apr 2016 #1

Daily Caller? Eugene Apr 2016 #2

Never mind, it's an old story, covered by a lot of very sketchy sources. GliderGuider Apr 2016 #3

it wouldnt be as cheap if all the externalities of nuclear fuel was taken in account saturnsring Apr 2016 #4

Damn right. Eg., no nuclear power station operator is, according to the accounts, insured Ghost Dog Apr 2016 #5