Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)

34. No, I think this message is spin. nt

Reply to HuckleB (Reply #32)

Wed Oct 26, 2016, 03:40 PM

Oct 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don't Like Monsanto? Then You Should Be Pro-GMO, Not Anti. Here's Why. [View all] progressoid Oct 2016 OP

yawn niyad Oct 2016 #1

Yeah, food security is rather a tedious subject. progressoid Oct 2016 #3

and that was clearly such industry propaganda. so, yes, yawn. we have heard niyad Oct 2016 #21

Which industry propaganda? progressoid Oct 2016 #26

WTF? ReRe Oct 2016 #2

Kavin Senapathy is the source. progressoid Oct 2016 #4

Without GMO how can massive corporations patent living plants? mackdaddy Oct 2016 #5

Corporations (massive and small) patented plants long before GMOs. progressoid Oct 2016 #6

"...Monsanto’s promise to never sue a farmer whose fields have been (unknowingly) contaminated..." OnlinePoker Oct 2016 #7

Did you read the court's conclusion? It wasn't unknowingly. progressoid Oct 2016 #9

Why should I be pro-GMO??? Wilms Oct 2016 #8

That's the thing. progressoid Oct 2016 #12

Screw GMOs and Monsanto both! How's that? upaloopa Oct 2016 #10

Sure. progressoid Oct 2016 #15

Science can be good and bad upaloopa Oct 2016 #25

"I Used to Work as a Scientist with GMOs... nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #11

More Dunning Kruger effect from the people that think they can fly if they meditate hard enough. progressoid Oct 2016 #13

Many GMO Pushers say that all scientists agree that GMO's are the new sliced bread nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #14

I'll take the word or scientists over an attorney from the Maharishi University of Gibberish. progressoid Oct 2016 #16

And how will you slime those that endorsed his book? Or the first PhD in that post? nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #17

So you're saying the vast majority of scientists who find the nonsense in that book to be nonsense.. HuckleB Oct 2016 #31

I don't think you actually understand what "science" is. kristopher Oct 2016 #33

More AAAS scientists believe GMO food is safe to eat than believe humans cause most climate change OnlinePoker Oct 2016 #18

You'll no doubt want to ignore the PhD's listed in post #17 nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #19

Do you never eat at a restaurant. OnlinePoker Oct 2016 #20

Let's unpack that statement kristopher Oct 2016 #35

in other words, the experts in europe, who have forbidden gmo's, have no idea what niyad Oct 2016 #22

Europe has forbidden GMO's? FBaggins Oct 2016 #23

Europe hasn't forbidden GMOs. progressoid Oct 2016 #27

That's unfortunate. GliderGuider Oct 2016 #29

Looks like your spinning seed didn't fall on fertile soil here. GliderGuider Oct 2016 #24

So you think the actual reality of the science is spin? HuckleB Oct 2016 #32

No, I think this message is spin. nt GliderGuider Oct 2016 #34

food security LWolf Oct 2016 #28

With a stable global population under a billion all such problems would go away. GliderGuider Oct 2016 #30

Yep. LWolf Oct 2016 #36