Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)

31. So you're saying the vast majority of scientists who find the nonsense in that book to be nonsense..

Reply to nationalize the fed (Reply #17)

Wed Oct 26, 2016, 02:05 PM

Oct 2016

... have been punked? You don't appear to realize how many scientists there are in the world.

You do know most of these are the usual anti-GMO crowd, right? They have yet to change the course of actual science on GMOs, because they're not able to prove their claims to other scientists. Hmm.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don't Like Monsanto? Then You Should Be Pro-GMO, Not Anti. Here's Why. [View all] progressoid Oct 2016 OP

yawn niyad Oct 2016 #1

Yeah, food security is rather a tedious subject. progressoid Oct 2016 #3

and that was clearly such industry propaganda. so, yes, yawn. we have heard niyad Oct 2016 #21

Which industry propaganda? progressoid Oct 2016 #26

WTF? ReRe Oct 2016 #2

Kavin Senapathy is the source. progressoid Oct 2016 #4

Without GMO how can massive corporations patent living plants? mackdaddy Oct 2016 #5

Corporations (massive and small) patented plants long before GMOs. progressoid Oct 2016 #6

"...Monsanto’s promise to never sue a farmer whose fields have been (unknowingly) contaminated..." OnlinePoker Oct 2016 #7

Did you read the court's conclusion? It wasn't unknowingly. progressoid Oct 2016 #9

Why should I be pro-GMO??? Wilms Oct 2016 #8

That's the thing. progressoid Oct 2016 #12

Screw GMOs and Monsanto both! How's that? upaloopa Oct 2016 #10

Sure. progressoid Oct 2016 #15

Science can be good and bad upaloopa Oct 2016 #25

"I Used to Work as a Scientist with GMOs... nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #11

More Dunning Kruger effect from the people that think they can fly if they meditate hard enough. progressoid Oct 2016 #13

Many GMO Pushers say that all scientists agree that GMO's are the new sliced bread nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #14

I'll take the word or scientists over an attorney from the Maharishi University of Gibberish. progressoid Oct 2016 #16

And how will you slime those that endorsed his book? Or the first PhD in that post? nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #17

So you're saying the vast majority of scientists who find the nonsense in that book to be nonsense.. HuckleB Oct 2016 #31

I don't think you actually understand what "science" is. kristopher Oct 2016 #33

More AAAS scientists believe GMO food is safe to eat than believe humans cause most climate change OnlinePoker Oct 2016 #18

You'll no doubt want to ignore the PhD's listed in post #17 nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #19

Do you never eat at a restaurant. OnlinePoker Oct 2016 #20

Let's unpack that statement kristopher Oct 2016 #35

in other words, the experts in europe, who have forbidden gmo's, have no idea what niyad Oct 2016 #22

Europe has forbidden GMO's? FBaggins Oct 2016 #23

Europe hasn't forbidden GMOs. progressoid Oct 2016 #27

That's unfortunate. GliderGuider Oct 2016 #29

Looks like your spinning seed didn't fall on fertile soil here. GliderGuider Oct 2016 #24

So you think the actual reality of the science is spin? HuckleB Oct 2016 #32

No, I think this message is spin. nt GliderGuider Oct 2016 #34

food security LWolf Oct 2016 #28

With a stable global population under a billion all such problems would go away. GliderGuider Oct 2016 #30

Yep. LWolf Oct 2016 #36