Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists and the Accidental President December 13-15, 2013 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)62. This Week in ‘Nation’ History: How Janet Yellen Can Turn the Fed to the Left
http://www.care2.com/causes/why-is-there-so-much-trouble-at-national-zoo.html
Next weeks all-but-certain confirmation of Janet Yellen as Federal Reserve chair presents a crucial opportunity to implement bold, progressive ideas in an institution that has for too long done too little to combat the vast economic inequalities in American society. As The Nations longtime national affairs correspondent William Greider wrote in our October 7, 2013 issue, Yellen well understands that much deeper change must be considered to get the economy back in balance.
Should the new chair need additional ideas as to what exactly should be changed at the Fed, Greiders articles in The Nation over the past decade would be a helpful place to start.
In The One-Eyed Chairman: How Greenspan Has Pushed the Rights Agenda (September 19, 2005), Greider lambasted the outgoing chairmans partisanship, irresponsibility and betrayal of ordinary Americans. It is amazing to read Greiders warnings, years before the 2008 crash, about the inevitable failure of Greenspans policies and the implications that would have for the broader deregulatory ideology of which he was for several decades perhaps the most prominent champion. (Greenspan would concede as much with his famous admission in October 2008 that there was a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works.)
Beware of economic policy-makers who go to extremes in defense of ideological convictions. Essentially, that is the nature of Greenspans grave failure. The real world did not cooperate with his right-wing beliefs, but he persisted anyway. In the hydraulics of monetary policy, his posture set in motion deep waves of economic extremes: fabulous personal wealth alongside a deeply indebted populace; extraordinary corporate profits alongside stagnant wages and surplus labor; too much capital and not enough consumer demand. These exaggerated waves, and some others, are still sloshing back and forth in the US economy. They will for years ahead, with more crises to come. Greenspan collected much praise for his swift and daring rescue missionsthe nimble fireman rushing from blaze to blaze, putting out fires before they destroyed the economy. What many people did not understand is that it was Greenspan who lit the match.
In 2009, as the Obama administration was reeling from aftereffects of the crash, Greider wrote Dismantling the Temple: How to Fix the Federal Reserve (August 3/10, 2009), which outlined a plan for a more democratic, more transparent, and more effective Federal Reserve.
A reconstituted central bank might keep the famous name and presidentially appointed governors, confirmed by Congress, but it would forfeit the mystique and submit to the usual standards of transparency and public scrutiny. The institution would be directed to concentrate on the Feds one great purposemaking monetary policy and controlling credit expansion to produce balanced economic growth and stable money. Most regulatory functions would be located elsewhere, in a new enforcement agency that would oversee regulated commercial banks as well as the shadow banking of hedge funds, private equity firms and others.
Next weeks all-but-certain confirmation of Janet Yellen as Federal Reserve chair presents a crucial opportunity to implement bold, progressive ideas in an institution that has for too long done too little to combat the vast economic inequalities in American society. As The Nations longtime national affairs correspondent William Greider wrote in our October 7, 2013 issue, Yellen well understands that much deeper change must be considered to get the economy back in balance.
Should the new chair need additional ideas as to what exactly should be changed at the Fed, Greiders articles in The Nation over the past decade would be a helpful place to start.
In The One-Eyed Chairman: How Greenspan Has Pushed the Rights Agenda (September 19, 2005), Greider lambasted the outgoing chairmans partisanship, irresponsibility and betrayal of ordinary Americans. It is amazing to read Greiders warnings, years before the 2008 crash, about the inevitable failure of Greenspans policies and the implications that would have for the broader deregulatory ideology of which he was for several decades perhaps the most prominent champion. (Greenspan would concede as much with his famous admission in October 2008 that there was a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works.)
Beware of economic policy-makers who go to extremes in defense of ideological convictions. Essentially, that is the nature of Greenspans grave failure. The real world did not cooperate with his right-wing beliefs, but he persisted anyway. In the hydraulics of monetary policy, his posture set in motion deep waves of economic extremes: fabulous personal wealth alongside a deeply indebted populace; extraordinary corporate profits alongside stagnant wages and surplus labor; too much capital and not enough consumer demand. These exaggerated waves, and some others, are still sloshing back and forth in the US economy. They will for years ahead, with more crises to come. Greenspan collected much praise for his swift and daring rescue missionsthe nimble fireman rushing from blaze to blaze, putting out fires before they destroyed the economy. What many people did not understand is that it was Greenspan who lit the match.
In 2009, as the Obama administration was reeling from aftereffects of the crash, Greider wrote Dismantling the Temple: How to Fix the Federal Reserve (August 3/10, 2009), which outlined a plan for a more democratic, more transparent, and more effective Federal Reserve.
A reconstituted central bank might keep the famous name and presidentially appointed governors, confirmed by Congress, but it would forfeit the mystique and submit to the usual standards of transparency and public scrutiny. The institution would be directed to concentrate on the Feds one great purposemaking monetary policy and controlling credit expansion to produce balanced economic growth and stable money. Most regulatory functions would be located elsewhere, in a new enforcement agency that would oversee regulated commercial banks as well as the shadow banking of hedge funds, private equity firms and others.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Five simple steps to financial freedom for women BY [i] Suzanne McGee and Alice Finn [/i]
Demeter
Dec 2013
#5
Hmmm. Jesuits... ¿Has the IMF also gone neo-Franciscan? ... A few recent snippets:
Ghost Dog
Dec 2013
#15
The New Advocates of Inequality want to take us back to the middle of the 19th century
Ghost Dog
Dec 2013
#45
Dent, Faber, Celente, Maloney, Rogers – What Do They Say Is Coming In 2014?
DemReadingDU
Dec 2013
#16
End of US quantitative easing at the beginning of 2014 at the latest (LEAP/E2020 May 2013)
Ghost Dog
Dec 2013
#29
No, the Budget Deal Isn't a "Compromise" (NOT AN EQUITABLE ONE, ANYWAY) By Patrick Caldwell
Demeter
Dec 2013
#26