Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists and the Accidental President December 13-15, 2013 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)10. Wholesale Prices in U.S. Fell for Third Month in November
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-13/wholesale-prices-in-u-s-declined-for-third-month-in-november.html
Wholesale prices in the U.S. declined for a third month in November, reflecting lower costs for energy and cars.
The 0.1 percent drop in the producer-price index followed a 0.2 percent decrease the prior month, a Labor Department report showed today in Washington. The median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of 77 economists called for no change. The so-called core measure, which excludes food and energy, rose 0.1 percent.
Prices of goods and materials used in the earlier stages of production fell for a second month as slow improvement in global markets limited demand. Scant signs of accelerating inflation indicate Federal Reserve policy makers meeting next week have more room to maintain their unprecedented $85 billion in monthly asset purchases in order to help spur the expansion.
Inflation remains quite tame, said Jim OSullivan, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics Ltd. in Valhalla, New York, who correctly projected the drop in prices. Over the course of the next year, the core numbers will drift up a little bit as the economy remains healthy and unemployment keeps falling.
Wholesale prices in the U.S. declined for a third month in November, reflecting lower costs for energy and cars.
The 0.1 percent drop in the producer-price index followed a 0.2 percent decrease the prior month, a Labor Department report showed today in Washington. The median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of 77 economists called for no change. The so-called core measure, which excludes food and energy, rose 0.1 percent.
Prices of goods and materials used in the earlier stages of production fell for a second month as slow improvement in global markets limited demand. Scant signs of accelerating inflation indicate Federal Reserve policy makers meeting next week have more room to maintain their unprecedented $85 billion in monthly asset purchases in order to help spur the expansion.
Inflation remains quite tame, said Jim OSullivan, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics Ltd. in Valhalla, New York, who correctly projected the drop in prices. Over the course of the next year, the core numbers will drift up a little bit as the economy remains healthy and unemployment keeps falling.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Five simple steps to financial freedom for women BY [i] Suzanne McGee and Alice Finn [/i]
Demeter
Dec 2013
#5
Hmmm. Jesuits... ¿Has the IMF also gone neo-Franciscan? ... A few recent snippets:
Ghost Dog
Dec 2013
#15
The New Advocates of Inequality want to take us back to the middle of the 19th century
Ghost Dog
Dec 2013
#45
Dent, Faber, Celente, Maloney, Rogers – What Do They Say Is Coming In 2014?
DemReadingDU
Dec 2013
#16
End of US quantitative easing at the beginning of 2014 at the latest (LEAP/E2020 May 2013)
Ghost Dog
Dec 2013
#29
No, the Budget Deal Isn't a "Compromise" (NOT AN EQUITABLE ONE, ANYWAY) By Patrick Caldwell
Demeter
Dec 2013
#26