Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Gentlepeople, Start Your Weekend! April 19-21, 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)5. Propaganda System That Has Helped Create a Permanent Overclass Is Over a Century in the Making
http://www.alternet.org/media/propaganda-system-has-helped-create-permanent-overclass-over-century-making?akid=10328.227380.GPg9Fe&rd=1&src=newsletter825186&t=18&paging=off
Pulling back the curtain on how intent the wealthiest Americans have been on establishing a propaganda tool to subvert democracy...Where there is the possibility of democracy, there is the inevitability of elite insecurity. All through its history, democracy has been under a sustained attack by elite interests, political, economic, and cultural. There is a simple reason for this: democracy as in true democracy places power with people. In such circumstances, the few who hold power become threatened. With technological changes in modern history, with literacy and education, mass communication, organization and activism, elites have had to react to the changing nature of society locally and globally.
From the late 19th century on, the threats to elite interests from the possibility of true democracy mobilized institutions, ideologies, and individuals in support of power. What began was a massive social engineering project with one objective: control. Through educational institutions, the social sciences, philanthropic foundations, public relations and advertising agencies, corporations, banks, and states, powerful interests sought to reform and protect their power from the potential of popular democracy.
Yet for all the efforts, organization, indoctrination and reformation of power interests, the threat of democracy has remained a constant, seemingly embedded in the human consciousness, persistent and pervasive.
In his highly influential work, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, French social psychologist Gustav Le Bon suggested that middle class politics were transforming into popular democracy, where the opinion of the masses was the most important opinion in society. He wrote: The destinies of nations are elaborated at present in the heart of the masses, and no longer in the councils of princes. This was, of course, a deplorable change for elites, suggesting that, the divine right of the masses is about to replace the divine right of kings. Le Bon suggested, however, that the crowd was not rational, but rather was driven by emotion and passion. An associate and friend of Le Bons, Gabriel Tarde, expanded upon this concept, and articulated the idea that the crowd was a social group of the past, and that the public was the social group of the future. The public, argued Tarde, was a spiritual collectivity, a dispersion of individuals who are physically separated and whose cohesion is entirely mental. Thus, Tarde identified in the growth of the printing press and mass communications a powerful medium through which the public was shaped, and that, if managed appropriately, could bring a sense of order to a situation increasingly chaotic. The newspaper, Tarde explained, facilitated the fusion of personal opinions into local opinions, and this into national and world opinion, the grandiose unification of the public mind.
The development of psychology, psychoanalysis, and other disciplines increasingly portrayed the public and the population as irrational beings incapable of making their own decisions. The premise was simple: if the population was driven by dangerous, irrational emotions, they needed to be kept out of power and ruled over by those who were driven by reason and rationality, naturally, those who were already in power...
MUST READ
Pulling back the curtain on how intent the wealthiest Americans have been on establishing a propaganda tool to subvert democracy...Where there is the possibility of democracy, there is the inevitability of elite insecurity. All through its history, democracy has been under a sustained attack by elite interests, political, economic, and cultural. There is a simple reason for this: democracy as in true democracy places power with people. In such circumstances, the few who hold power become threatened. With technological changes in modern history, with literacy and education, mass communication, organization and activism, elites have had to react to the changing nature of society locally and globally.
From the late 19th century on, the threats to elite interests from the possibility of true democracy mobilized institutions, ideologies, and individuals in support of power. What began was a massive social engineering project with one objective: control. Through educational institutions, the social sciences, philanthropic foundations, public relations and advertising agencies, corporations, banks, and states, powerful interests sought to reform and protect their power from the potential of popular democracy.
Yet for all the efforts, organization, indoctrination and reformation of power interests, the threat of democracy has remained a constant, seemingly embedded in the human consciousness, persistent and pervasive.
In his highly influential work, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, French social psychologist Gustav Le Bon suggested that middle class politics were transforming into popular democracy, where the opinion of the masses was the most important opinion in society. He wrote: The destinies of nations are elaborated at present in the heart of the masses, and no longer in the councils of princes. This was, of course, a deplorable change for elites, suggesting that, the divine right of the masses is about to replace the divine right of kings. Le Bon suggested, however, that the crowd was not rational, but rather was driven by emotion and passion. An associate and friend of Le Bons, Gabriel Tarde, expanded upon this concept, and articulated the idea that the crowd was a social group of the past, and that the public was the social group of the future. The public, argued Tarde, was a spiritual collectivity, a dispersion of individuals who are physically separated and whose cohesion is entirely mental. Thus, Tarde identified in the growth of the printing press and mass communications a powerful medium through which the public was shaped, and that, if managed appropriately, could bring a sense of order to a situation increasingly chaotic. The newspaper, Tarde explained, facilitated the fusion of personal opinions into local opinions, and this into national and world opinion, the grandiose unification of the public mind.
The development of psychology, psychoanalysis, and other disciplines increasingly portrayed the public and the population as irrational beings incapable of making their own decisions. The premise was simple: if the population was driven by dangerous, irrational emotions, they needed to be kept out of power and ruled over by those who were driven by reason and rationality, naturally, those who were already in power...
MUST READ
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Propaganda System That Has Helped Create a Permanent Overclass Is Over a Century in the Making
Demeter
Apr 2013
#5
"Taking the Risk Out of Democracy: Corporate Propaganda versus Freedom and Liberty"
bread_and_roses
Apr 2013
#25
PA Court Deals Blow to Fracking Industry: Corporations Not The Same As Persons With Privacy Rights
Demeter
Apr 2013
#8
Solar panels could destroy U.S. utilities, according to U.S. utilities By David Roberts
Demeter
Apr 2013
#22
Could you be a little more specific about which of the many crazy things irks you?
Demeter
Apr 2013
#39
Margaret Thatcher – a strong leader, but a resolute failure by any other measure
xchrom
Apr 2013
#55