Thank you EarlG! HILLARY CLINTON ROOM

[BooScout]

33. Jury Results....

I was on one of the juries that voted 7 to 0 to Hide one of Beauregard's posts on that thread where it all blew up (I was juror #2):

----------------------------
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:29 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Is that supposed to be a joke, asshole?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7108188

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is the definition of "hurtful, rude, insensitive, over the top...."

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:39 AM, and the Jury voted 7-0 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: FAIL. Easiest decision I've ever had to make on a DU jury.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I don't care who supports who. There is absolutely no excuse for a post such as this. MIRT needs to look at this poster.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Way over the top, good alert. Hide this moronic post.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Though the post responded to was ugly, the rules are pretty clear that this is NOT the way to address the ugly post. Sorry… I'm angry over how the conversation continues from that camp, but we should all know how to respond to that ugly stuff by now. They bait people to do exactly what you're being called on. Please learn from this. There is a better way to stand up to ugliness.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: .. goes beyond normal allowances for poor taste
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.