Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
7. The first large-scale test of backfilling with slurry in the US was made in Scranton PA . . .
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 12:48 AM
Jan 2014

Last edited Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:32 AM - Edit history (2)

. . . 1972-73 by the Bureau of Mines. Results of that test can be found at the following link (beginning on page 20):

http://archive.org/stream/pumpedslurryback00cola/pumpedslurryback00cola_djvu.txt

You'll notice that it was in abandoned mine workings where the test was conducted. However . . .

"Hydraulic backfilling was developed during the late 1800s and early 1900s and was used in about one-fourth of the anthracite mines for such purposes as to extinguish mine fires, to arrest the development of progressive pillar failure known as mine squeeze, to permit the reclaiming of pillars, to dispose of unwanted mine refuse, and to protect the surface. The practice of backfilling by the coal industry in the United States decreased after World War I with the decline of the anthracite industry. In domestic bituminous coal mining operations, backfilling has never been common practice." (emphasis added)

http://www.techtransfer.osmre.gov/NTTMainSite/Library/pub/psb/section1.pdf

FWIW: In northern West Virginia and southwestern Pennsylvania---where water sources and supplies continue to be damaged and destroyed---some of the damage and destruction by the intentional subsidence from shield-support longwall mining could have been (might yet be?) reduced by backfilling or backstowing mine wastes. But then, again . . . (** tsk **) . . . it's obviously more "technologically and economically feasible" to simply continue dumping mine wastes in every available hollow, burying more streams.
-----------------------

Edited to add:
Years ago, I became aware that backstowing of mine wastes was mandatory in Germany; and, therefore, it was more than a little disturbing to realize how Germany's RWE/Rheinbraun (the then-parent company of our friendly neighborhood coal operator) was sorta undermining water sources and supplies but not backstowing! Anyway . . .

The following link should give some indication of what other folks can expect if/when longwall mining begins deliberately subsiding in their neck of the woods, too:

http://www.scottchurchdirect.com/ted-williams.aspx/sagging-streams?pg=1





(As we used to say way-back-when: "Take that gob and shove it . . . . . . back in the mine!&quot





Latest Discussions»Region Forums»West Virginia»Who Owns West Virginia's ...»Reply #7