Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)

3. It's impossible to be progressive without advocating metric measurement

Reply to jakeXT (Original post)

Sun Jan 12, 2014, 07:18 AM

Jan 2014

Here is a map of all the countries using the imperial system of measurement which (in addition to the points of the video) is based on the King's thumb and foot. Remember, conservatives love British royalty!

If Obama wants to make a legacy, and drive the Tea party so far around the bend they disappear into their own anatomy, he would push through proper metrification in 2015 after we get out the vote in 2014 to make a Democratic majority.

If metric is good enough for the US Army and schoolchildren, it is good enough for the USA. Or we comfort ourselves that at least we have Burma among advanced countries with us.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Imperial Measurements With Matt Parker [View all] jakeXT Jan 2014 OP

Try engineering something with that system. Enthusiast Jan 2014 #1

I'll do one better. NASA lost a $653 million dollar mission due to an imperial snafu... Locut0s Jan 2014 #2

Really foul misnomer to call it "metric mixup". Better to call it "imperial mixup". Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #4

OMG! Enthusiast Jan 2014 #7

We've decimalized the imperial system krispos42 Jan 2014 #18

Metric would still be an advantage for the non-decimalized parts Jim Lane Jan 2014 #19

Add 50% to the MPH number. krispos42 Jan 2014 #21

I've sometimes used 60mph = 88fps Jim Lane Jan 2014 #24

The only advantage I see is in calculating the volume (liter vs gallon), if you want to know how jakeXT Jan 2014 #20

Ah,but there's still geometry involved. krispos42 Jan 2014 #22

It's impossible to be progressive without advocating metric measurement Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #3

This would be very cool to see... Locut0s Jan 2014 #5

I remember back in the '70s BumRushDaShow Jan 2014 #6

The large majority of us Brits still think in imperial. tjwmason Jan 2014 #8

When Canada heard that the U.S. was converting to the metric system.. Doc_Technical Jan 2014 #9

Hahahaha progressoid Jan 2014 #13

Hey! We got Liberia, too! Wounded Bear Jan 2014 #10

More evidence... CanSocDem Jan 2014 #11

The US has to run two measurement systems. That costs corporations. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #15

Didn't mean to denigrate 'branding'... CanSocDem Jan 2014 #16

Cool. Now we need branding for metric :P . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #17

They didn't waste their time in Canada. CanSocDem Jan 2014 #23

I've worked construction all my life. panader0 Jan 2014 #12

Yes, materials would change. But you have to get started on change or be left behind. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #14