Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: TYT: Elizabeth Warren Asked About Hillary Clinton & It's Devastating [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)18. Hillary and Elizabeth Warren do not agree on the fundamental economic issues.
They probably don't agree on the TPP?
There are just too many issues on which they probably don't agree. They can't run together. What is more -- two white women on the same ticket? No.
What is more -- two women from the Northeast on the same ticket? No.
It will be either Hillary or Elizabeth or Bernie Sanders. I vote against Hillary. If she could win elections, she would already be in the White House. Her 2008 campaign pleased her donors and her husband but not the voters. And that is the way it will be in 2012 once she gets going.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
TYT: Elizabeth Warren Asked About Hillary Clinton & It's Devastating [View all]
WhoIsNumberNone
Feb 2015
OP
Seems like Cenk brought the devastating word in, it wasn't Warren, allow Warren to make her own
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#1
pretty much how I read it also. Cenk's interpretation of..the wisdom of E Warren
misterhighwasted
Feb 2015
#6
Not Powerful??? Then you have not bothered to look at the truth to the power of Hillary Clinton
misterhighwasted
Feb 2015
#17
Hillary and Elizabeth Warren do not agree on the fundamental economic issues.
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#18
Don't be so sure about that. None of us are privy to the conversations of the two.
misterhighwasted
Feb 2015
#25
I disagree. Certainly differencies, however there is something about the two of them that...
misterhighwasted
Feb 2015
#34
Cenk did a great job. Hillary is the best candidate for the Republican Party.
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#7
Warren is NOT RUNNING.Does that REALITY even enter your thought process? And Hillary IS PROGRESSIVE.
RBInMaine
Mar 2015
#70
Looked to me like, "Damning with faint praise." And I mean Sen Warren and not Cenk. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#45
Funny how quick they are, isn't it. Sometimes it pays to be on top of things.
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#9
I think there must be a special Bot Phone -- er, Bat Phone -- or something
RufusTFirefly
Feb 2015
#14
Yes HRC has the Big Banks and Wall Street on her team. None of which like Sen Warren.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#48
You make excellent points. Do you think she can raise the billion dollars necessary to run?
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#23
If Dwight Eisenhoer was alvive today, he would be supporting HRC 100%
Old and In the Way
Feb 2015
#54
I see her as being available, as you say. Not trying to stake out a place yet...it's early. But
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#24
Cenk's always pulling shite like that. I clicked on thinking I would be seeing something that
Cha
Feb 2015
#43
LOL.. That's how the profitable "left" earn their click$.. It's "Devastating!".. "Inconceivable!"
Cha
Feb 2015
#57
That's not devastating. It's a smart thing for Warren to say. A firm endorsement now before seeing Hillary's platform
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#38
Yes! And why shouldn't we, as voters, extract those same commitments? (See my comment directly below.)
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#59