Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
7. From the IG of the Intelligence Community
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016
https://oig.state.gov/system/files/23_july_2015_cn_summary_of_ic_ig_support_to_state_department_ig.pdf
We note that none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings, but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network.


link to statement
The IC IG found four emails containing classified IC-derived information in a limited sample of 40 emails of the 30,000 emails provided by former Secretary Clinton. The four emails, which have not been released through the State FOIA process, did not contain classification markings and/or dissemination controls. These emails were not retroactively classified by the State Department; rather these emails contained classified information when they were generated and, according to IC classification officials, that information remains classified today. This classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system.


http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/23July2015_CN_SummaryofICIGsupport.PDF
"State personnel continue to deny the classified character of the released information despite a definitive determination from the IC Interagency FOIA process)"


The State Department tried "deny, deny, deny". That's part of the point of my post above for Feb 4th Press Conference. The State Department isn't denying it any more!!!

The FBI, the CIA, the IG of the State Department, the IG of the Intelligence Community and now, finally, the State Department itself all agree ... that Hillary transmitted material that was classified at the time of transmission.

The only one now left who doesn't agree with this ... is Hillary.

Game over.
Yes, it is a good read. Esp after all the lies being posed in gd-p. riversedge Feb 2016 #1
DU posters Floridanow Feb 2016 #4
More likely to come Floridanow Feb 2016 #2
Clinton trying to cling to the other two Secretarys of State is a deception. Jarqui Feb 2016 #3
None of the email was classified. Floridanow Feb 2016 #5
You need to reread my post. It provides a transcript of Jarqui Feb 2016 #6
I think Secretary Clinton knows it was TS at the time Press Virginia Feb 2016 #8
I do not understand her strategy. Did she really think that not coming clean Jarqui Feb 2016 #9
I don't think she's capable of admitting mistakes Press Virginia Feb 2016 #11
I think so as well. This is not a little "oops". It's not a one time thing. Jarqui Feb 2016 #12
From the IG of the Intelligence Community Jarqui Feb 2016 #7
you apparently have your own personal def' of 'deception' contradictory to what every one else means Bill USA Feb 2016 #13
You want to provide a link to that quote. (I doubt it matters... but) Jarqui Feb 2016 #15
it well known that Bernie said:""Nobody wants to hear about your damn emails." Bill USA Feb 2016 #19
Nope Jarqui Feb 2016 #20
LOL! the 1st step in disinformation is to willfully misinterpret the opponents statements. Bill USA Feb 2016 #21
that was not a quote from Bernie - I would have put the statment in quotes - it was my own Bill USA Feb 2016 #22
you should understand that Democrats are not impressed with Punk Talk. Which you have some facility Bill USA Feb 2016 #23
RE your statement: "Powell and Rice did not: - have their own unsecured server".. they had personal Bill USA Feb 2016 #14
Have you got a link to that eyesore? to back it up nt Jarqui Feb 2016 #16
are U being offensive "eyesore"? here are more links in addition to the one in OP, did you read it? Bill USA Feb 2016 #17
No, I'm aware of the media stories on Powell & Rice Jarqui Feb 2016 #18
the para you ask links for cites facts that have been reported numerous times. IF you hadn't been Bill USA Feb 2016 #24
A long winded way of saying "I'm pullin' this out of my a**" and Jarqui Feb 2016 #25
re: comment 14. if you can't be more specific I am not going to begin a private seminar for you.. Bill USA Feb 2016 #27
That might explain ejbr Feb 2016 #10
So she's justifying herself in terms of the Dubya administration? Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»State Department: Powell,...»Reply #7