Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
12. Okay, but '...Nelson ruled jurors should hear about the defendant's criminal justice studies...'
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:48 PM
Jul 2013
What about his lengthy criminal charging record, even though he wasn't jailed?

A background check into that should be heard to give the jury an idea of the kind of behavior Z indulged in before, and it's not pretty. I see Z as a long-time criminal who got away with a lot and he didn't stop doing things that showed he was untrustworthy after arrest, either.

He had no business with a CCW or working to become a policeman with his background. Can you imagine the body count if he was granted the power to act 'under color of law?'

Color of law

The appearance of a legal right.

The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or her authority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting himself or herself in the course of official duties.

Under the civil rights act of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with State Action, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by the state.


color of law n. the appearance of an act being performed based upon legal right or enforcement of statute, when in reality no such right exists. An outstanding example is found in the civil rights acts which penalize law enforcement officers for violating civil rights by making arrests "under color of law" of peaceful protestors or to disrupt voter registration. It could apply to phony traffic arrests in order to raise revenue from fines or extort payoffs to forget the ticket.

See: Ku Klux Klan Act
.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Ku+Klux+Klan+Act

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Color+of+Law

P. S. The KKK Act is interesting.
The problem with his "Stand Your Ground" defense: It wasn't his fucking ground. NYC_SKP Jul 2013 #1
Amen. Exactly. tblue Jul 2013 #45
A picture is emerging from the trial of what went down Nancy Waterman Jul 2013 #2
Am I missing something? Flashmann Jul 2013 #5
Yup, Flashman. You hit the nail on the head. Th1onein Jul 2013 #6
MURDERER! Yes and he will live with that tblue Jul 2013 #46
It always seemed to me Cracklin Charlie Jul 2013 #18
I think you're right on target. notadmblnd Jul 2013 #22
But I think the law holds that premeditation is specific to an individual, not just anyone, though. freshwest Jul 2013 #57
Should make it easier to convict on the 2 degree murder charge. LiberalFighter Jul 2013 #37
On another thread, another day, a DUer hypothesized that Zimmerman's nose that broken 1monster Jul 2013 #9
The drink can was still in TM's pocket Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #35
So sad. That poor kid. tblue Jul 2013 #47
Egypt taking over but DNA evidence was painting a picture of Martin not having Z DNA on him. Thor_MN Jul 2013 #17
George Zimmerman more likely caused his own slight nose injury JimDandy Jul 2013 #50
good points. less concrete wounds than a kid skinning a knee or elbow. Sunlei Jul 2013 #56
Possible but AtheistCrusader Jul 2013 #19
That's what I've thought from the beginning when I first heard those 911 tapes. yardwork Jul 2013 #43
I agree with most of that brush Jul 2013 #51
You hit the nail on the head... SummerSnow Jul 2013 #54
All gun nuts/toters study SYG and SD laws. They want to know when they can blast away. Hoyt Jul 2013 #3
Actually many states Duckwraps Jul 2013 #23
And that's about all the "students" take away from the NRA courses. Hoyt Jul 2013 #24
Couldn't say. I've never attended A NRA course. Duckwraps Jul 2013 #28
Interesting azurnoir Jul 2013 #4
Zimmermurderer went through the shooter's checklist on his call to the cops Cronus Protagonist Jul 2013 #7
exactly azurnoir Jul 2013 #8
Exactly! And I also believe that him questioning... Little Star Jul 2013 #13
And the ridiculous dialogue from a grade B movie. yardwork Jul 2013 #44
I would think the kid wouldn't be able to utter a word Cronus Protagonist Jul 2013 #52
"pre-justifying what he planned to do to the boy" tblue Jul 2013 #48
The prosecution John2 Jul 2013 #10
Your second paragraph makes a substantial point... pacalo Jul 2013 #34
how could he fight back, when he had to keep his hand ready on his gun? Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #53
And did he get an "A" in the class marshall Jul 2013 #11
They did, and he did. "Best student." nt IdaBriggs Jul 2013 #16
Okay, but '...Nelson ruled jurors should hear about the defendant's criminal justice studies...' freshwest Jul 2013 #12
I agree, John2 Jul 2013 #14
"blow to his credibility" CanonRay Jul 2013 #15
sorry, didn't see yours when I posted mine, that was my take-away too. SaveAmerica Jul 2013 #27
Sounds like Raul Rodriguez did as well... KansDem Jul 2013 #20
Precisely Cronus Protagonist Jul 2013 #25
Zimmerman sounds more pathetic by the day Politicub Jul 2013 #21
How much credibility does he have left to lose? I laughed at that part. SaveAmerica Jul 2013 #26
Even if he walks on this murder......this is/was a preview of coming attractions in his life... Gin Jul 2013 #29
If you carry it's smart to know the law, or you may find ileus Jul 2013 #30
I always pull back to the basics. jonthebru Jul 2013 #31
We live about 90 minutes from there. As I walked in, the local news was on and someone was being 24601 Jul 2013 #32
Question did Z skeewee08 Jul 2013 #33
He claims "he wanted to get an address". pacalo Jul 2013 #36
I'm wondering if he had gps on his phone or in the car? LiberalFighter Jul 2013 #41
Good point. I believe he wanted a confrontation. pacalo Jul 2013 #42
I think you meant a different word than prepared. LiberalFighter Jul 2013 #49
What keeps going over and over in my mind WHEN CRABS ROAR Jul 2013 #38
The question not asked, When did Z take the safety off? vinny9698 Jul 2013 #39
There is no safety on that type of gun. It is a double action, I believe nt Duckwraps Jul 2013 #55
The hoodie was also damning. AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #40
Probably looking for fine print about killing black people ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Zimmerman studied Florida...»Reply #12