Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Jury Finds Occupy Wall Street Protester Innocent After Video Contradicts Police Testimony [View all]So the police lied and then attempted to with hold evidence...under the law isn't this considered perjury and obstruction of justice?
But I keep forgetting...there are two sets of laws, and even under the special ones for police and prosecutors they're hardly ever held responsible for their actions!!!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jury Finds Occupy Wall Street Protester Innocent After Video Contradicts Police Testimony [View all]
G_j
Mar 2013
OP
Never, of course. It is unlikely that anyone can find even one case in which a cop was prosecuted
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#30
You can't legitimately say that everyone lies under oath. There is no factual basis for that.
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#31
If it had just gone before a judge it wouldn't have gone down that way.
Spitfire of ATJ
Mar 2013
#22
Incidence encapsulates big brother's determination not to tolerate constitutionally-protected First
indepat
Mar 2013
#24
NYPD are STILL paying out money from illegal arrests made during the 2004 RNC
Downtown Hound
Mar 2013
#25
Not just "shoot him in the back" or shoot him in the back while handcuffed, but kick him afterwards.
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#32
It Is An Unfortunate Fact, Sir, That There Is No Particular Reason Ever To Believe Police Testimony
The Magistrate
Mar 2013
#27