Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

G_j

(40,367 posts)
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 10:58 AM Mar 2013

Jury Finds Occupy Wall Street Protester Innocent After Video Contradicts Police Testimony [View all]

Source: Village Voice

Jury Finds Occupy Wall Street Protester Innocent After Video Contradicts Police Testimony

Friday, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:53 AM
By Nick Pinto

Michael Premo was found not guilty of assaulting an officer after video evidence contradicted police testimony.

In the first jury trial stemming from an Occupy Wall Street protest, Michael Premo was found innocent of all charges yesterday after his lawyers presented video evidence directly contradicting the version of events offered by police and prosecutors.

Premo, an activist and community organizer who has in recent months been a central figure in the efforts of Occupy Sandy, was one of many hundred people who took part in a demonstration in Lower Manhattan on December 17 of 2011, when some protesters broke into a vacant lot in Duarte Square in an attempt to start a new occupation.

After police broke up the action in Duarte Square, hundreds of protesters marched north, playing a game of cat and mouse with police on foot and on scooters, who tried to slow and divide the column of marchers. At 29th Street near Seventh Avenue, police finally managed to trap a large number of marchers, kettling them from both sides of the block with bright orange plastic netting. After holding the crowd in the nets for some time, a few people managed to escape, and police rushed in to the crowd with their hands up.
In the commotion, Premo fell to the ground and attempted to crawl out of the scrum. (Covering the march, I was also kettled on this block for a time, though I only witnessed Premo's arrest from a distance.)

..more..

Read more: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2013/03/jury_finds_occu.php

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good. nt bemildred Mar 2013 #1
when does the perjury trial start? n/t Enrique Mar 2013 #2
Doubt it will, police are given a different set of rules. n/t bamacrat Mar 2013 #6
Like members of Congress and the 1%. nt valerief Mar 2013 #19
I'm thinking the accusation that he fractured an officer's bone could... Poll_Blind Mar 2013 #23
It's an interesting question, though, don't you think? MADem Mar 2013 #29
Exactly what I was thinking. Answer to question: Never firenewt Mar 2013 #9
Never, of course. It is unlikely that anyone can find even one case in which a cop was prosecuted AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #30
Back in the day, we had it right: riqster Mar 2013 #3
Okay atreides1 Mar 2013 #4
Attempting to PERVERT the cause of justice where I come from. /nt TheMadMonk Mar 2013 #12
BINGO! n/t DeSwiss Mar 2013 #16
Exactly! HooptieWagon Mar 2013 #21
if someone lies under oath, isn't that perjury? mountain grammy Mar 2013 #5
One wonders whether these officers will be charged with perjury Vinnie From Indy Mar 2013 #7
NYPD is a Criminal Gang formercia Mar 2013 #8
The whole world was watching, with cameras on their phones. WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #10
If anyone ever wondered why cops grab cameras at such events Wednesdays Mar 2013 #14
Or why they worked so hard to make filming the police illegal. DCKit Mar 2013 #20
To Serve and Protect........guess who? Dryvinwhileblind Mar 2013 #11
Since there are no perjury charges nor obstruction charges hootinholler Mar 2013 #13
Wow, the police lie? ybbor Mar 2013 #15
fuck tha police frylock Mar 2013 #17
To be fair ...everyone lies ...we are a nation of liars. L0oniX Mar 2013 #18
You can't legitimately say that everyone lies under oath. There is no factual basis for that. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #31
I didn't say that ...but thanks for playing. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #34
If it had just gone before a judge it wouldn't have gone down that way. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #22
Quite so! another_liberal Mar 2013 #41
Incidence encapsulates big brother's determination not to tolerate constitutionally-protected First indepat Mar 2013 #24
NYPD are STILL paying out money from illegal arrests made during the 2004 RNC Downtown Hound Mar 2013 #25
Absolutely: christx30 Mar 2013 #28
Not just "shoot him in the back" or shoot him in the back while handcuffed, but kick him afterwards. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #32
A lawyer for the ACLU told me years ago G_j Mar 2013 #33
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2013 #26
It Is An Unfortunate Fact, Sir, That There Is No Particular Reason Ever To Believe Police Testimony The Magistrate Mar 2013 #27
. blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #35
You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride. 7wo7rees Mar 2013 #36
Regular proof quakerboy Mar 2013 #37
I like how you think. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2013 #39
K&R! Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #38
It used to be that if an officer lied under oath, he/she could never be used in court again CanonRay Mar 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jury Finds Occupy Wall St...