Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(36,238 posts)
37. Yeah, well
Mon Mar 4, 2024, 04:15 PM
Mar 4

bottom up is how one flips informants -- a kind of crowdsourcing of new arrestees. Tried and true in big criminal cases with still-moving parts. I suspect you knew all that, too, but just in case.

No, it was all one investigation. One. And it didn't take more than one "due process" series of obstructions for Garland to decide to appoint a Special Counsel. Garland had already set up Smith's Grand Juries to last until the end of this month. It took Trump announcing his candidacy for 2024, for Garland to announce a SC, since Garland had already decided by then on who would do the best, fastest and most thorough investigation and case building of the first-in-US history indictments. One doesn't just hear the news and decide such things overnight.

Give Garland credit for Jack Smith, ffs. Garland got all the documents the Special Counsel team is using in the FL documents case; Smith's team has been handling the classified content, along with the plentiful text, tapes, phone audio evidence around their movement and storage. As you know from the ultimate referrals by the Jan 6 Committee to the DOJ, there were a LOT of moving parts long before, during, and since the current indictments. But Garland set up Smith's Grand Juries to last until the end of this month.

Garland "blinked." With over 100,000 DOJ employees and hundreds of Jan 6 convictions under his belt, yeah, he's human. Try that line with bigtree and BumRushDaShow. She's got a lot more reasons than I about why Garland is in 'the God' category of executive appointees. But hey, you and the perfect-as-the-enemy-of-the-good crowd are the experts on investigating terrorism.

Armchair critics say Garland blinked? Oh noes!

Here's what Garland had done before he brought Jack Smith over from The Hague:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218670579


I suspect he's gotten wind of the disatisfaction... Think. Again. Mar 3 #1
Garland has spoken out previously in support of voting rights Fiendish Thingy Mar 3 #4
Garland is disliked by many on both sides. He knows history will not be kind to him, Earth-shine Mar 3 #7
Well said, but I find it hard to believe an intelligent person... Think. Again. Mar 3 #18
Are you ascribing motives to him beyond a desire to preserve the status quo institutionalism? Earth-shine Mar 3 #25
I do believe he is somehow motivated to weaken the stance of the left... Think. Again. Mar 3 #30
He's not an actual member of the Federalist Society. But, he hangs out with them. Earth-shine Mar 3 #31
And it's impossible to find anything about his personal political leanings... Think. Again. Mar 3 #32
I read somewhere (and I can't remember where or why) that Garland is a moderate registered Democrat. Earth-shine Mar 4 #33
He didn't do the best he could. onecaliberal Mar 3 #26
I didn't say that he did his best. I said, "he believes in his heart, he did what he could ..." Earth-shine Mar 3 #27
I wouldn't pretend to know what he thinks. I look at his actions. onecaliberal Mar 3 #28
I thought I was as anti-Garland as the next person. You showed me I'm not. Earth-shine Mar 3 #29
When it comes to losing democracy, I'm not milquetoast. onecaliberal Mar 4 #36
I wonder if he realizes our Democracy is under attack. Autumn Mar 3 #2
Yah, you tell them! Unelected Merrick! nt TeamProg Mar 3 #3
I'm sure the congregation is aware but did he offer any assistance to help with the situation? Deuxcents Mar 3 #5
Continually through the Civil Rights Division BumRushDaShow Mar 3 #9
thank you. both for reply, and links to specifics. stopdiggin Mar 3 #11
It's a redux of what happened with respect to Eric Holder on DU. BumRushDaShow Mar 3 #12
criticism of the gov is almost knee-jerk and reflexive stopdiggin Mar 3 #16
I just now saw the video of VP Harris' speech. I thought she was great... Deuxcents Mar 3 #17
I had the stream in a tab for when she arrived to speak BumRushDaShow Mar 3 #19
Uninformed knee jerk reactions are predictable here these days onenote Mar 3 #20
"DU needs a Civics 101 Group." ancianita Mar 3 #21
Finally noticed something was amiss, did he? comradebillyboy Mar 3 #6
Just a big disappointment. trump should've been tried a year ago if not for slow timidity... brush Mar 3 #8
DOJ has been fighting for voting rights and on the cybercrime and ransomware/e-currency fronts. usonian Mar 3 #10
You're right ancianita Mar 3 #22
garland's inaction has put Democracy at risk samsingh Mar 3 #13
Hark! He rises. choie Mar 3 #14
Great! BaronChocula Mar 3 #15
Yeah! He was 12 years old when Bull Connor ... and 20 years after that ancianita Mar 3 #23
Looks like my post BaronChocula Mar 4 #34
Yeah, well ancianita Mar 4 #37
As someone who once defended Garland BaronChocula Mar 4 #38
Link where you did that on DU. I've never seen your name come up. Until you do I'm not buying what you're selling. ancianita Mar 4 #39
K BaronChocula Mar 4 #40
I remember that Garland said that voting rights were going to be on his agenda and glad to see he went to Selma. nt ShazamIam Mar 3 #24
Rip Van Garland finally wakes up just enough to notice voting rights are under attack. Mawspam2 Mar 4 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Attorney General Garland ...»Reply #37