Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Yes! About f'in time. Why do we have this law if no one is going to follow it? AllyCat Dec 2023 #1
The Colorado Supreme Court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency. LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #2
here is the filing from the court...... Takket Dec 2023 #3
A remarkably detailed and well reasoned decision. A tad tedious but well reasoned. TomSlick Dec 2023 #38
It won't be difficult for them at all FBaggins Dec 2023 #41
It will not be difficult for SCOTUS to reverse but TomSlick Dec 2023 #44
But what happens if other states join in? They are going to block all of them? Maraya1969 Dec 2023 #93
Difficult to predict. TomSlick Dec 2023 #95
I am telling you all DENVERPOPS Dec 2023 #97
Yes, they will block all of them using Colorado as precedent. SlimJimmy Dec 2023 #102
My problem with this is that COL Mustard Dec 2023 #66
Yeah, but the 14th doesn't require conviction; it just says "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" William Seger Dec 2023 #92
The "Literalists" will be twisting themselves ina knot stevebreeze Dec 2023 #98
In George Washington's day, Trump would already have been taken out and executed. Lonestarblue Dec 2023 #114
Hallelujah! Drum Dec 2023 #4
Time to buy ketchup futures!! DippyDem Dec 2023 #5
Caps Lock on his phone is about to have a rough night. tanyev Dec 2023 #33
As are bottles of ketchup at Merde-A-Loco. area51 Dec 2023 #51
Merde is shit. Well done. twodogsbarking Dec 2023 #56
BREAKING: by 4-3 vote, Colorado Supreme Court bars Trump from primary ballot LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #6
Kind of wonder how the three dissenters justified their positions rurallib Dec 2023 #8
All Colorado Bludogdem Dec 2023 #52
thank you very much rurallib Dec 2023 #57
Four of them didn't cash their Soros checks. DJ Porkchop Dec 2023 #88
This message was self-deleted by its author DJ Porkchop Dec 2023 #89
Bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha mcar Dec 2023 #7
SCOTUS is getting heartburn as we type Maeve Dec 2023 #9
SCOTUS is getting heartburn as we type BunnyMcGee Dec 2023 #16
After all the blowback for recent decisions, the Federalist Society Six must have stomach ulcers by now. sop Dec 2023 #111
Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump disqualified from holding presidency LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #10
So proud of my state. NOW, plenty of others, BE SO BOLD as to follow suit!!!! RobertDevereaux Dec 2023 #11
I wish they'd ban him from TV too! world wide wally Dec 2023 #12
From all media if thats possible onetexan Dec 2023 #40
Wow. I didn't expect that underpants Dec 2023 #13
I'm sure bigmonk Dec 2023 #14
Yup ananda Dec 2023 #37
Now we're fucking talking Blue Owl Dec 2023 #15
States Rights... radicalleft Dec 2023 #17
So will his 3 appointees recuse themselves? Nt LNM Dec 2023 #18
Au contraire! They'll declare him president-for-life by fiat. Orrex Dec 2023 #24
Au contraire! The federalistsocieters-funded-by-the-kochs will agree with CO. Justice matters. Dec 2023 #101
Ugh. Which to hope for? Orrex Dec 2023 #120
For some reason the Kochs wanted Lillie Wu to be the Mayor of Wichita Bengus81 Dec 2023 #127
Hooray! NM's effort to get him off may now proceed apace Warpy Dec 2023 #19
Hey, those start adding up. calimary Dec 2023 #60
Votes add up for Biden Captain Zero Jan 2024 #136
Minnesota and one other state decided the other way on this, so.... AdamGG Dec 2023 #20
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! qwlauren35 Dec 2023 #21
here is the ruling/opinion melm00se Dec 2023 #22
About time that he got legally kicked up his fucking ass. SoFlaBro Dec 2023 #23
His name won't appear on the ballot, but it can still be written in. {edited} mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2023 #25
Wouldn't matter. TwilightZone Dec 2023 #29
Thanks. I had no time to go through the opinion. NT mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2023 #108
Hell, half of his voters MyOwnPeace Dec 2023 #42
Hahahahaha orangecrush Dec 2023 #47
Write-in votes for him won't be counted - stated explicitly in the opinion Prairie Gates Dec 2023 #70
TL; DR, especially since I had just sat down for dinner. Thanks. NT mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2023 #106
Ah, you stated your point with such supreme authority and confidence Prairie Gates Dec 2023 #112
Oh wow, never saw that coming. Dave Bowman Dec 2023 #26
This is going to drive the orange loon right over the edge. flashman13 Dec 2023 #27
Violent traitors have no place in public office. Kid Berwyn Dec 2023 #28
Cue the whine fest on Faux state television tonight. I'd never know cuz I never watch the motherfuckers. Comfortably_Numb Dec 2023 #30
Let the pouty party begin.... durablend Dec 2023 #31
I think this is great, but... eggplant Dec 2023 #32
If he's not on the ballot for the primary ExWhoDoesntCare Dec 2023 #45
It's not necessary to be on the ballot for a state's primary to be on that state's general election ballot. 24601 Dec 2023 #121
True - but the decision probably deals with that FBaggins Dec 2023 #130
Colorado Supreme Court kicks Trump off the state's 2024 ballot for violating the U.S. Constitution LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #34
Party time! ificandream Dec 2023 #35
What a beautiful thing Deb Dec 2023 #36
the proverbial turd just struck the proverbial fanblade 0rganism Dec 2023 #39
my bet is that SCOTUS will allow him on the ballot with a concurring majority of all kinds of opinions prodigitalson Dec 2023 #43
Nice to see there's at least ONE court willing to stand up to Trump perdita9 Dec 2023 #46
Well, that should be interesting. malthaussen Dec 2023 #48
We live in interesting times. nt hay rick Dec 2023 #49
Great news orangecrush Dec 2023 #50
the comments on faux news's website are amusing... moonshinegnomie Dec 2023 #53
K&R AKwannabe Dec 2023 #54
Almost certain to be overturned before the primary. Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #55
Yes - and thus likely a bad thing FBaggins Dec 2023 #59
"likely a bad thing" Prairie Gates Dec 2023 #71
No, they cannot John Shaft Dec 2023 #118
Correct - they cannot. But they could if this ruling stands FBaggins Dec 2023 #119
I'm not sure about that. EndlessWire Dec 2023 #69
Without requiring a conviction by a jury, a judge's opinion can be based on anything. Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #74
Well, conviction is not required in this case. EndlessWire Dec 2023 #80
Reality, due process and precedent say that a conviction *is* required. Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #84
Well, Katyal and Luttig say differently. EndlessWire Dec 2023 #90
Yes, without a conviction I dont see it standing. oldsoftie Dec 2023 #76
Could be by summer Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #78
How? FBaggins Dec 2023 #86
Smith's J6 trial Fiendish Thingy Dec 2023 #87
There is already a legal finding of fact EndlessWire Dec 2023 #91
Facts based on no conviction, which is required. SlimJimmy Dec 2023 #104
No conviction is required EndlessWire Dec 2023 #107
It may not be REQUIRED but I still think there should BE one. oldsoftie Dec 2023 #110
So, your'e okay with a few witnesses testifying against you, then you're sentenced to prison? SlimJimmy Dec 2023 #133
This is a matter EndlessWire Dec 2023 #134
State judges, even a supreme court, do not have the final say concerning SlimJimmy Dec 2023 #135
No. A conviction isn't needed Novara Dec 2023 #116
Silly fearmongering Tarc Dec 2023 #100
SCOTUS?? Wait a minuite- What about hair on fire whirling maggots shrieking States Rights States Rights States Rights NBachers Dec 2023 #58
I'm pretty sure they mean CONFEDERATE States' rights. dchill Dec 2023 #61
Gutless Supremes.. Maxheader Dec 2023 #62
2 opposing things here. GreenWave Dec 2023 #63
TRUMP'S TEN ELECTORAL VOTES DOWN. ancianita Dec 2023 #64
Can you explain EndlessWire Dec 2023 #72
I'm reporting ancianita Dec 2023 #115
Wow! ShazzieB Dec 2023 #77
Assuming SCOTUS upholds Colorado ruling and several other states do same, Silent Type Dec 2023 #65
The U. S. Supreme Court Bludogdem Dec 2023 #67
Too bad these conservative . . . DC77 Dec 2023 #82
There is still the originalism Bludogdem Dec 2023 #132
Section 3 doesn't require a conviction TwilightZone Dec 2023 #94
It does not expressly rquire a conviction, but a conviction would be SlimJimmy Dec 2023 #105
Section 3 is self-executing John Shaft Dec 2023 #117
I'm sure this will be appealed by Dump sakabatou Dec 2023 #68
Very interesting! ShazzieB Dec 2023 #73
I'm stunned. EndlessWire Dec 2023 #75
Does a failed insurrection attempt count? Freethinker65 Dec 2023 #79
Of course. In fact it's the only kind that does FBaggins Dec 2023 #81
Treason doth never prosper / What's the reason? Prairie Gates Dec 2023 #113
Damn, what a good start. republianmushroom Dec 2023 #83
49 states to go-nt Ollie Garkie Dec 2023 #85
yay DonCoquixote Dec 2023 #96
One down 49 to go Hassler Dec 2023 #99
No way SCOTUS will let this stand. Kablooie Dec 2023 #103
The vagueness in all this astounds me! Aussie105 Dec 2023 #109
The way I read the announcement is that the decision is stayed until January 4th. 33taw Dec 2023 #122
Your reading is correct - but incomplete FBaggins Dec 2023 #124
I fully believe this will be appealed and the order stayed. 33taw Dec 2023 #128
I agree... and possibly with a larger majority than most expect FBaggins Dec 2023 #129
Joe Biden with a great response to Trump's Colorado Disqualification LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2023 #123
Guess who will save him? DownriverDem Dec 2023 #125
Don't Want Trump Kicked Off OhioTim Dec 2023 #126
Kick kick kickety kick Hekate Dec 2023 #131
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Donald Trump is barred fr...»Reply #5