Latest Breaking News

samir.g

(835 posts)

37. "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!"

Reply to Polybius (Original post)

Mon Apr 10, 2023, 04:40 PM

Apr 2023

Jackson did it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden administration says disregarding abortion pill ruling would set "dangerous precedent" [View all] Polybius Apr 2023 OP

I agree. OnDoutside Apr 2023 #1

The judge needs to be slammed and shut down. LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #2

Yes. The ruling is clearly wrong and defies precedent, but it would marybourg Apr 2023 #3

I like it republianmushroom Apr 2023 #4

I agree, but make no mistake... The Unmitigated Gall Apr 2023 #5

They are no doubt interested in the effort in Israel... WestMichRad Apr 2023 #16

Then why haven't they ever done it before? Polybius Apr 2023 #18

Because, in my opinion... The Unmitigated Gall Apr 2023 #24

The problem was our system was created to stop an evil person here or there RAB910 Apr 2023 #6

The fascists are offering anarchy... where the rule of law is wholly abandoned. WheelWalker Apr 2023 #7

This is less "following suit" and more "leading with an ace". n/t Igel Apr 2023 #40

Letting women die is a worse precedent. C_U_L8R Apr 2023 #8

For the moment that ruling does nothing ...... groundloop Apr 2023 #9

re:"that ruling does nothing--a second ruling--requires this medicine to stay on the market" thesquanderer Apr 2023 #36

More dangerous than women dying for no good reason? f_townsend Apr 2023 #10

Yes nt speak easy Apr 2023 #14

Yes RobinA Apr 2023 #34

What about the dangerous precedent set by the judge? Sanity Claws Apr 2023 #11

But they are gods, don'tchaknow peppertree Apr 2023 #13

This is one I have to break with Biden on slightlv Apr 2023 #12

I totally agree with you Iwasthere Apr 2023 #17

Yes, we vote... slightlv Apr 2023 #25

GOP judges setting national injunctions while Dem/neutral ones limit themselves is a weakness NullTuples Apr 2023 #30

No, ignoring the ruling sets the proper precedent Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #15

This!!! WestMichRad Apr 2023 #19

The argument is that Republican Presidents didn't ignore Roe (and later on Casey) Polybius Apr 2023 #22

Mostly agree, but.... luxmatic Apr 2023 #20

It almost feels like the Bannon faction did what they could to foment civil war quickly and now... NullTuples Apr 2023 #29

Oh, what damage rogue judges bucking for sainthood could do! Warpy Apr 2023 #21

Only problem is the establishment clause boundaries are determined by...SCOTUS NullTuples Apr 2023 #27

Ok, the legal states will ignore it. roamer65 Apr 2023 #23

The punchline is that Republicans ignore precedent anyway when it benefits them to do so. NullTuples Apr 2023 #26

The Supreme Court ignoring precedent is legal, however Polybius Apr 2023 #28

It may be legal, but they're dismantling generations of settled law on a whim. NullTuples Apr 2023 #31

Biden doesn't even have to ignore it; he could just slow walk FDA implementation...for a decade NullTuples Apr 2023 #32

Yes, it is. Igel Apr 2023 #41

So, some of you are saying that even though life will be more difficult and dangerous Magoo48 Apr 2023 #33

Yes RobinA Apr 2023 #35

"John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!" samir.g Apr 2023 #37

And you want to defend that? Igel Apr 2023 #42

When do we start fighting this war? Voltaire2 Apr 2023 #38

Typical. Dems follow the law while repugs would disregard it SouthernDem4ever Apr 2023 #39