Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Polybius

(15,525 posts)
Mon Apr 10, 2023, 12:25 PM Apr 2023

Biden administration says disregarding abortion pill ruling would set "dangerous precedent" [View all]

Source: CBS News

Washington — The Biden administration on Sunday appeared to dismiss suggestions from some congressional Democrats that it ignore a ruling from a federal judge in Texas that took aim at the abortion pill, with a spokeswoman saying doing so would set a "dangerous precedent."

In a series of tweets in response to a decision from U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk halting the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval of the drug mifepristone, Kamara Jones, spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services, reiterated that the agency is prepared to continue defending that 22-year-old approval through the legal process.

"People are rightly frustrated about this decision — but as dangerous a precedent it sets for a court to disregard FDA's expert judgment regarding a drug's safety and efficacy, it would also set a dangerous precedent for the administration to disregard a binding decision," Jones said. "We are confident that the law is on our side."

Jones noted that the Justice Department will seek a stay of the decision pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which would allow mifepristone to stay on the market while legal proceedings continue.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abortion-pill-ruling-texas-fda-mifepristone-biden-administration/

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I agree. OnDoutside Apr 2023 #1
The judge needs to be slammed and shut down. LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #2
Yes. The ruling is clearly wrong and defies precedent, but it would marybourg Apr 2023 #3
I like it republianmushroom Apr 2023 #4
I agree, but make no mistake... The Unmitigated Gall Apr 2023 #5
They are no doubt interested in the effort in Israel... WestMichRad Apr 2023 #16
Then why haven't they ever done it before? Polybius Apr 2023 #18
Because, in my opinion... The Unmitigated Gall Apr 2023 #24
The problem was our system was created to stop an evil person here or there RAB910 Apr 2023 #6
The fascists are offering anarchy... where the rule of law is wholly abandoned. WheelWalker Apr 2023 #7
This is less "following suit" and more "leading with an ace". n/t Igel Apr 2023 #40
Letting women die is a worse precedent. C_U_L8R Apr 2023 #8
For the moment that ruling does nothing ...... groundloop Apr 2023 #9
re:"that ruling does nothing--a second ruling--requires this medicine to stay on the market" thesquanderer Apr 2023 #36
More dangerous than women dying for no good reason? f_townsend Apr 2023 #10
Yes nt speak easy Apr 2023 #14
Yes RobinA Apr 2023 #34
What about the dangerous precedent set by the judge? Sanity Claws Apr 2023 #11
But they are gods, don'tchaknow peppertree Apr 2023 #13
This is one I have to break with Biden on slightlv Apr 2023 #12
I totally agree with you Iwasthere Apr 2023 #17
Yes, we vote... slightlv Apr 2023 #25
GOP judges setting national injunctions while Dem/neutral ones limit themselves is a weakness NullTuples Apr 2023 #30
No, ignoring the ruling sets the proper precedent Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #15
This!!! WestMichRad Apr 2023 #19
The argument is that Republican Presidents didn't ignore Roe (and later on Casey) Polybius Apr 2023 #22
Mostly agree, but.... luxmatic Apr 2023 #20
It almost feels like the Bannon faction did what they could to foment civil war quickly and now... NullTuples Apr 2023 #29
Oh, what damage rogue judges bucking for sainthood could do! Warpy Apr 2023 #21
Only problem is the establishment clause boundaries are determined by...SCOTUS NullTuples Apr 2023 #27
Ok, the legal states will ignore it. roamer65 Apr 2023 #23
The punchline is that Republicans ignore precedent anyway when it benefits them to do so. NullTuples Apr 2023 #26
The Supreme Court ignoring precedent is legal, however Polybius Apr 2023 #28
It may be legal, but they're dismantling generations of settled law on a whim. NullTuples Apr 2023 #31
Biden doesn't even have to ignore it; he could just slow walk FDA implementation...for a decade NullTuples Apr 2023 #32
Yes, it is. Igel Apr 2023 #41
So, some of you are saying that even though life will be more difficult and dangerous Magoo48 Apr 2023 #33
Yes RobinA Apr 2023 #35
"John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!" samir.g Apr 2023 #37
And you want to defend that? Igel Apr 2023 #42
When do we start fighting this war? Voltaire2 Apr 2023 #38
Typical. Dems follow the law while repugs would disregard it SouthernDem4ever Apr 2023 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden administration says...