Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
Thu Jun 11, 2020, 11:12 AM Jun 2020

Liberal groups back plan to expand Supreme Court [View all]

Source: Politico

The movement on the left to pack the Supreme Court is gaining momentum.

A group of progressive organizations is for the first time supporting the proposal to add justices to the court in hopes of weakening the conservative majority, according to a memo provided to POLITICO. The move comes weeks before the Supreme Court is expected to hand down opinions on several hotly contested issues, including President Donald Trump’s tax returns, abortion rights and the fate of “Dreamers.”

The Progressive Change Institute, Be a Hero, Friends of the Earth, Presente and 350 are among those groups that are newly joining the call, according to organizers. Take Back the Court, Demand Justice and the Sunrise Movement, which previously backed the idea, also signed onto the open letter.

“Trump and the Republicans in Congress have used aggressive tactics, including eliminating the filibuster, to pack the courts with conservative ideologues and prevent the will of the people from being heard,” said Erich Pica, president of the environmental group Friends of the Earth. “From the fight for racial justice to efforts to stop climate change and protect our clean air and water, the current configuration of the court has consistently stood in the way of progress. We simply do not have a generation’s worth of time to replace judges.”

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/11/liberal-groups-expand-supreme-court-plan-313037



Good thing Republicans can't change the numbers the next time THEY control Congress....right?

(I don't support this; neither does Biden).
93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IMO SCOTUS is far too powerful, far too political and so easily slanted for decades. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2020 #1
So you're just going to let RW judges shit on the American people? dalton99a Jun 2020 #2
Only two on the court jimfields33 Jun 2020 #5
Add two or three new justices to the court. dalton99a Jun 2020 #7
No thank you. Two trump judges are enough. jimfields33 Jun 2020 #8
??? 5 on the court, right? lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #53
Good grief. Read the full thread on what I was replying to. jimfields33 Jun 2020 #60
Yup re-read it and your brief cryptic title is still inscrutable. lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #62
Tough. What I wrote is perfect and accurate. jimfields33 Jun 2020 #63
You rock dude; you are indeed perfect. lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #64
Have a great day!!!!! jimfields33 Jun 2020 #65
I second that. Kingofalldems Jun 2020 #72
We need to win the November election. Then as vacancies occur we can appoint progressive judges. totodeinhere Jun 2020 #28
FDR did not make a mistake. His threat of adding justices was enough to swing votes for the New Deal dalton99a Jun 2020 #61
I suggest they crack open a history book before they waste time and money on this.... George II Jun 2020 #3
As soon as they wrote "pack the Supreme Court" I discounted the article csziggy Jun 2020 #12
Getting into the guts of the article, it turns out to be just another "progressive" shot at Biden... George II Jun 2020 #14
Actually Bernie Sanders doesn't support packing the court either JonLP24 Jun 2020 #84
Who was talking about Bernie Sanders? We're talking about the possibility of our next President... George II Jun 2020 #85
You made this into Progressive vs Biden thing JonLP24 Jun 2020 #88
"Progressive" is a moving target/definition. MANY Democrats consider Biden to be a "progressive".... George II Jun 2020 #89
Sanders is rated as the most liberal Senator out of Senators that served 10 years JonLP24 Jun 2020 #90
Sorry, no he isn't. You obviously didn't check my link. Have a great evening............. George II Jun 2020 #91
No, "packing" the Court means adding additional members to the Court. totodeinhere Jun 2020 #31
Moscow Mitch didn't pack it; he stole it. lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #68
Yes, that's one way of putting it. n/t totodeinhere Jun 2020 #73
Yep. " Being Politico, I think this is just more pot stirring and water carrying for trump." mahina Jun 2020 #92
Republicans only changed the Supreme Court filibuster jimfields33 Jun 2020 #4
The article has an underlying anti-Democratic agenda. George II Jun 2020 #15
I agree with you - the constitution says congress regulates that court, anyway. ArizonaLib Jun 2020 #22
The Tara Reade "incident" didn't work, "defunding the police" isn't working, this is just another... George II Jun 2020 #26
Good to see those jerks on the run ArizonaLib Jun 2020 #49
Thanks. Sounded like it. jimfields33 Jun 2020 #30
Correct, Harry Reid's actions, which were widely supported at DU at the time, gave the Republicans totodeinhere Jun 2020 #32
For sure they would. Next thing you know we'll have 100 Supreme Court judges. jimfields33 Jun 2020 #33
I'm very much in favor of this... OR, term limits of 10 years. NurseJackie Jun 2020 #6
Absolutely. dalton99a Jun 2020 #10
At least term limits of 10 years. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2020 #16
12 years with the option after that to make it lifetime but only if cstanleytech Jun 2020 #20
Only if we do it right... Blue_playwright Jun 2020 #87
great idea. rampartc Jun 2020 #9
If Trump gets another appointment, you will feel differently. Dawson Leery Jun 2020 #11
Fair enough to want reforms to the court BUT janterry Jun 2020 #13
No. If we add more, Republicans will add more as soon as they can. CaptainTruth Jun 2020 #17
Each restacking has less potency. 5-4, 6-5, are way different than 15-14. Lucky Luciano Jun 2020 #38
We need to follow Buttigieg's plan on it FreeState Jun 2020 #43
This seems well thought out. Lucky Luciano Jun 2020 #67
What would be a far better tactic, IMHO NewJeffCT Jun 2020 #18
President Biden will be able to add judges just as easily as trump jimfields33 Jun 2020 #34
If Merrick Garland had been confirmed it would be 5 democratic appointees .. aggiesal Jun 2020 #19
Best would be if we had legal grounds to invalidate every seat that was blocked by McConnell. JudyM Jun 2020 #23
I agree HootieMcBoob Jun 2020 #27
You make it seem like Garland is a liberal judge. Calista241 Jun 2020 #47
What if she doesn't retire? Polybius Jun 2020 #58
No I don't. I specifically did not use Liberal .vs. Conservative judges ... aggiesal Jun 2020 #59
it cannot happen unless we get a huge majority in the Senate, right? jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #21
Nope, just 50 votes +1 nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2020 #45
The Senate Dems will have to remove the filibuster entirely to pass legislation expanding the USSC. Calista241 Jun 2020 #48
At this late stage in the American Experiment, the risk is worth it nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2020 #69
it would be worth the sacrifice. jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #74
The filibuster isn't in the Constitution. roamer65 Jun 2020 #78
We need to undo the court-stacking nt Gore1FL Jun 2020 #24
I think we need a look at the entire federal court system. Lonestarblue Jun 2020 #25
something has to be done. Not sure if expanding will work but if it does, i'm in. onetexan Jun 2020 #29
There are two stolen Supreme Court seats. That must be fixed. Lucky Luciano Jun 2020 #35
At the beginning of his second term Roosevelt proposed "packing" the Supreme Court... George II Jun 2020 #36
Maybe it's time to "Even" the Scotus moonseller66 Jun 2020 #37
Decision #285 from SCOTUS 2035 A.D... moonseller66 Jun 2020 #39
Bad idea. Let's focus on winning elections in November before we start talking about changing jalan48 Jun 2020 #40
I would not object but we would have to make rather cstanleytech Jun 2020 #41
Didn't FDR try to add to the SCOTUS? Or want to. Thirties Child Jun 2020 #42
He wanted to but didn't get too far Steelrolled Jun 2020 #54
Given the actions of the Republicans in packing the court I think its warranted this time. cstanleytech Jun 2020 #75
I think another attempt at it would be shameful Steelrolled Jun 2020 #79
Again the actions of the Republicans have already brought shame this would bring balance but cstanleytech Jun 2020 #80
Yup, take it up to 12 seats, don't care if GOP does the same Fiendish Thingy Jun 2020 #44
"The American Experiment is on its lasts legs anyway" Steelrolled Jun 2020 #56
The reality of the past three years is evidence enough that America is on its last legs Fiendish Thingy Jun 2020 #70
Trump has little power Steelrolled Jun 2020 #77
"The foundations of government are still there"; how naive Fiendish Thingy Jun 2020 #82
Reducing is a better strategy. Reduce the Court to 7. Last hired, first fired. n/t TygrBright Jun 2020 #46
Expand the conservates to a remote island. LiberalFighter Jun 2020 #50
I have posted this before and will post it again. melm00se Jun 2020 #51
Isn't this a never ending game, like executive orders? Steelrolled Jun 2020 #52
Pack ? Dems packing the court did that fuck of a report just say pack the court Fullduplexxx Jun 2020 #55
In 2018, Time Magazine said the court needs 27 justices More_Cowbell Jun 2020 #57
This is the only way we will be able to end gerrymandering and have true democracy. SunSeeker Jun 2020 #66
Let's just hope that there isn't a "next time" that they control Congress. If we take control, W T F Jun 2020 #71
We will also need to eliminate the filibuster in the Senate. roamer65 Jun 2020 #76
While I think generally that this is getting ahead of ourselves stopwastingmymoney Jun 2020 #81
Neither did Bernie Sanders JonLP24 Jun 2020 #83
I'm all for it, personally Yeehah Jun 2020 #86
Take away the "lifetime" appointment FakeNoose Jun 2020 #93
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Liberal groups back plan ...