Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Suburban Warrior

(405 posts)
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 10:46 PM Jun 2020

A 'misclassification error' made the May unemployment rate look better than it is. [View all]

Source: Washington Post

When the U.S. government’s official jobs report for May came out on Friday, it included a note at the bottom saying there had been a major “error” indicating that the unemployment rate likely should be higher than the widely reported 13.3 percent rate.

The special note said that if this “misclassification error” had not occurred, the “overall unemployment rate would have been about 3 percentage points higher than reported,” meaning the unemployment rate would be about 16.3 percent for May.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics, the agency that puts out the monthly jobs reports, said it was working to fix the problem.

“BLS and the Census Bureau are investigating why this misclassification error continues to occur and are taking additional steps to address the issue,” said a note at the bottom of the Bureau of Labor Statistics report.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/06/05/may-2020-jobs-report-misclassification-error/

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wat dis?? An..."error", you say? Leghorn21 Jun 2020 #1
Kick and recommend for visibility bronxiteforever Jun 2020 #2
So all those sweaty liars in the garden today pretty much look like idiots now, right Leghorn21 Jun 2020 #3
No, because the narrative has been set... regnaD kciN Jun 2020 #55
it's the Mueller report redux. Yavin4 Jun 2020 #57
Was this intentional to make the numbers look better thn they were? jayddrew Jun 2020 #4
Yes, remember during Obama's entire term, Mr.Bill Jun 2020 #10
An Order Had To Go Out DallasNE Jun 2020 #28
Bingo... IthinkThereforeIAM Jun 2020 #39
Huh? The 2.5 M reported gain in jobs came from the Establishment Survey, not the Household Survey. progree Jun 2020 #41
The error is believing anything Trump's Administration says. dem4decades Jun 2020 #5
From day one of this Adminstration, Wellstone ruled Jun 2020 #6
Just tonight, Paul Krugman told us he trusts the professionalism of BLS staff. Eugene Jun 2020 #7
They Did Put The Footnote In The Report Saying DallasNE Jun 2020 #29
Didn't Krugman state not fooled Jun 2020 #32
just feeding the trump bullshit machine, that little error.... NRaleighLiberal Jun 2020 #8
FFS? Then why don't they adjust or issue a correction kysrsoze Jun 2020 #9
Because it was in the original report. It wasn't an "error" per se. Igel Jun 2020 #18
Yes, This is How It Is Supposed To Be Done DallasNE Jun 2020 #30
The same kind of thing happened in March and April. progree Jun 2020 #42
That Compounds The Problem DallasNE Jun 2020 #49
They are two completely separate surveys -- the 2.5 million jobs gain comes from the Establishment progree Jun 2020 #50
I Have Been Trying To Call This To Attention All Day DallasNE Jun 2020 #11
Fortunately, even the financial websites have discussed the issue, acknowledging Hoyt Jun 2020 #12
That Trump would completely gloss over this is hardly surprising. John Fante Jun 2020 #13
Horserace DallasNE Jun 2020 #31
trump's a fucking liar gopiscrap Jun 2020 #14
An error? Botany Jun 2020 #15
George Floyd will be unhappy about this looking down from above. Lucky Luciano Jun 2020 #16
WWGFD! Brainfodder Jun 2020 #19
Perfect! Nevilledog Jun 2020 #37
Thought of this too D_Master81 Jun 2020 #26
Anybody know where this footnote appears? Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #17
The text of the BLS report is here: mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2020 #51
The error seems legit, but the spin on it is pure GOP propaganda IronLionZion Jun 2020 #20
I call humongous BS paleotn Jun 2020 #21
Here is another link angrychair Jun 2020 #22
Has little Donny been playing with his Sharpie again? Blue Owl Jun 2020 #23
cooking them books Cryptoad Jun 2020 #24
Joe can't get rid of the whole crew, as they are by and large civil servants, which mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2020 #52
Wall Street. not_the_one Jun 2020 #25
And Wall Street went nuts over the news today... SergeStorms Jun 2020 #27
Powell and the Fed..... Wuddles440 Jun 2020 #53
Sooner or later... SergeStorms Jun 2020 #56
Bartcop's Law: When someone makes an "error" that profits them, expect to see that same error again Midnight Writer Jun 2020 #33
I understand what a "classification error" would be, but soldierant Jun 2020 #34
Yes and the error was found just in time for the Friday night news dump. Jim__ Jun 2020 #35
And 2 + 2 5. Beartracks Jun 2020 #36
Error my ass!!! More like Trump and his people trying to cook the books is my bet. cstanleytech Jun 2020 #38
March and April also had the same problem. March was "almost 1 percentage point", progree Jun 2020 #40
No need to hunt around for non-paywalled articles. It's right in the BLS report summary progree Jun 2020 #43
Hate to keep harping on this... maddogesq Jun 2020 #44
And its also low by about 3 percentage points, since the U3 unemployed is a subset of U6's unemployd progree Jun 2020 #45
I personally know two people who lost their jobs in the period. Hugin Jun 2020 #46
I suspected that all along. Karma13612 Jun 2020 #47
13.3 isn't anything to celebrate JI7 Jun 2020 #48
"Misclassification Error"...? Sounds like the political "Wardrobe Malfunction"... regnaD kciN Jun 2020 #54
So this is what Donny Dotard is crowing about? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 #58
That liddle "misclassification" caused the Unemployment Rate to jump 24.8% BadGimp Jun 2020 #59
Kick ck4829 Jun 2020 #60
Kick ck4829 Jul 2020 #61
"... this misclassification error continues to occur...." area51 Jul 2020 #62
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A 'misclassification erro...