Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

George II

(67,782 posts)
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 11:55 PM Jul 2019

CA lawmakers pass bill requiring Trump, presidential candidates to release tax returns [View all]

Source: ABC News

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California legislation that would require presidential and state gubernatorial candidates to release their tax returns in order to appear on the state's ballot cleared a significant hurdle, passing the State Assembly with an overwhelming majority vote.

SB 27, co-authored by Senators Mike McGuire and Scott Wiener, was approved by the State Assembly Monday with a 57-17 vote, according to McGuire's office. It will be heard again in the State Senate this week, and if approved, will head to Gov. Gavin Newsom for his signature.

"Presidential candidates need to put their own interests aside in the name of transparency," McGuire's office said in a written statement. "So far, our current President has done the opposite and it's time that President Trump steps up, stops with the obstruction, and follows through with 40 years of time-honored tradition that has made this nation's democracy stronger. This commonsense legislation applies equally to all candidates, from all political parties, including the Governor of California."

In May, McGuire and Wiener amended the legislation to extend the transparency rules to the office of the Governor of California, as well as presidential candidates.

Read more: https://abc7news.com/politics/ca-lawmakers-pass-bill-requiring-trump-to-release-tax-returns/5389210/



California has 55 Electoral Votes. That's huge.
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
not a requirement for prez in the us constitution nt msongs Jul 2019 #1
Doesn't matter. Each state runs its own election to select the POTUS. stopbush Jul 2019 #3
Bingo!! SHRED Jul 2019 #7
What will it matter? Polybius Jul 2019 #45
yes and will likely be blocked by SC AlexSFCA Jul 2019 #22
How? They just let gerrymandering continue because they don't want to interfere in Yavin4 Jul 2019 #30
But that ruling benefited Republicans Retrograde Jul 2019 #38
Neither is requiring signatures to get on the ballot. Angleae Jul 2019 #23
So proud to be a Californian SHRED Jul 2019 #2
On one hand it's no biggie b/c he was never going to win CA in 2020, but... RockRaven Jul 2019 #4
It's freaking awesome SHRED Jul 2019 #5
Hear, hear. sandensea Jul 2019 #12
Yes, it's a big deal!! And no, he will never win CA but as mentioned it may hurt the down ballot Thekaspervote Jul 2019 #6
Love my state! Maybe this will catch on in some others. Kind of Blue Jul 2019 #8
K&R Scurrilous Jul 2019 #9
While this is a fantastic concept Jake Stern Jul 2019 #10
It's purely a state matter as per the constitution. The SC has no say. PSPS Jul 2019 #16
We're suffering multiple Constitutional crises. Just because the Supreme tandem5 Jul 2019 #21
"Florida 2000" had nothing in common with what is being discussed here: Ballot eligibility PSPS Jul 2019 #41
The thread topic is about that, yes, however I wasn't tandem5 Jul 2019 #42
Remember Bush v Gore in 2000? Retrograde Jul 2019 #39
Sorry, but that had nothing to do with ballot eligibility, which is what this thread is about. PSPS Jul 2019 #40
See post #42 Retrograde Jul 2019 #43
Are Any Other States Passing Similar Bills? dlk Jul 2019 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Qutzupalotl Jul 2019 #13
IT ONLY APPLIES TO THE PRIMARY. onenote Jul 2019 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Qutzupalotl Jul 2019 #54
They did this in 2017 but Jerry Brown vetoed it More_Cowbell Jul 2019 #14
I'm so happy to live in California. No other place I'd rather be. onecaliberal Jul 2019 #15
+10,000! Kind of Blue Jul 2019 #18
Way to go my homies!!! mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #17
Thank you, California - Now, let's get some more states on board. States Rights! States Rights! NBachers Jul 2019 #19
I got a bad feeling about these kind of laws... tandem5 Jul 2019 #20
I have serious doubts that this will be in place for 2020 ripcord Jul 2019 #29
I believe that Trump will be on the California ballot. NCjack Jul 2019 #24
re: "California has 55 Electoral Votes. That's huge." thesquanderer Jul 2019 #25
This right here Jake Stern Jul 2019 #35
I mean according to Lawrence Tribe, watoos Jul 2019 #26
In fact, such a ruling would open the door for federal intervention in state-run federal elections pecosbob Jul 2019 #28
Passed through the assembly only, but hopefully the Senate will pass. Newsome almost sure to sign hlthe2b Jul 2019 #27
Yes, I noticed that but also read elsewhere that it's sure to pass the Senate, Newsome will sign it. George II Jul 2019 #32
This could be big for the Dems. Without Trump on the ballot, Republican turnout will be suppressed. Yavin4 Jul 2019 #31
What if Florida passes a bill prohibiting a Presidential candidate from appearing on the ballot if 24601 Jul 2019 #33
Gov Jerry Brown vetoed the last bill so there may be some blowback we're not aware of Brother Buzz Jul 2019 #34
Be careful what you wish for Jake Stern Jul 2019 #36
This right here DVRacer Jul 2019 #46
Between my & ca, we might just survive this nightmare. lindysalsagal Jul 2019 #37
"California has 55 Electoral Votes. That's huge" Polybius Jul 2019 #44
The bill passed the State Senate, awaiting Newsome's (expected) signature. George II Jul 2019 #47
This can swing both ways jgmiller Jul 2019 #48
This will have no impact on Trump or the 2020 election onenote Jul 2019 #49
Kick ck4829 Jul 2019 #50
Again -- this is completely meaningless onenote Jul 2019 #51
People here have a tendency to read the headline and not he actual article bearsfootball516 Jul 2019 #53
or the posted snippet, neither of which mention this. nt Qutzupalotl Jul 2019 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CA lawmakers pass bill re...