Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Appeals court dismisses 'emoluments' lawsuit involving President Trump's D.C. hotel [View all]PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)21. NBC News story...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Appeals court dismisses 'emoluments' lawsuit involving President Trump's D.C. hotel [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jul 2019
OP
They didn't rule on the substance, only on whether these plaintiffs had standing to sue.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2019
#51
No. There are a ton of cases holding that a claim of generalized injuries
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2019
#52
If the DAs of 2 States he's collecting bribes from don't have standing who would?
Farmer-Rick
Jul 2019
#3
I think that most people on DU understand by now the Senate's role in any impeachment and
in2herbs
Jul 2019
#23
Yes. Trump profiting off the hotel is scummy, shady, and distasteful, but its legal. nt
SylviaD
Jul 2019
#50
So, who exactly DOES have standing to enforce the emoluments clause?
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Jul 2019
#13
The elected office of the Attorney General of D.C. should be considered to have standing
BumRushDaShow
Jul 2019
#19
Financial injury (including security costs among other things) for the city
BumRushDaShow
Jul 2019
#43
Those are precisely the types of injuries the court found didn't confer standing
onenote
Jul 2019
#44
The court found that protection of competition was not in the "zone of interests" that the clause is
onenote
Jul 2019
#46
I was a lawyer who started out as a law clerk for a circuit judge.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Jul 2019
#54
Again, members of Congress have brought their own suit and were found to have standing
onenote
Jul 2019
#18
but it's a basic principal of constitutional interpretation that clauses were written for a reason.
unblock
Jul 2019
#35
it is enforceable by those who have standing, may be, if it were clear who has that beyond Congress.
Thomas Hurt
Jul 2019
#25
The 4th Circuit's dismissal of this suit leaves two other Emoluments Clause suits in place,...
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2019
#37