Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Didn't Consult McGa...»Reply #16
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: Trump Didn't Consult McGahn About Hush-Money Payments, Source Says [View all]

AC_Mem

(1,979 posts)
16. Does anyone believe there are only 2 payoffs?
Reply to DonViejo (Original post)
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 09:23 PM
Aug 2018

I'm betting there is MUCH more... and probably some very serious stuff.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump Didn't Consult McGahn About Hush-Money Payments, Source Says [View all] DonViejo Aug 2018 OP
*says totes-not-Don-McGahn* RockRaven Aug 2018 #1
While creepy MosheFeingold Aug 2018 #2
That's FAUX New's line, why repeat that strawman here? Cohen copped to a felony not a civil fine uponit7771 Aug 2018 #5
Don't watch Faux news, but I was a lawyer on campaigns MosheFeingold Aug 2018 #6
So not reporting the campaign benefiting payment and trying to hide its source is perfectly legal? uponit7771 Aug 2018 #7
If it had a mixed purpose, yes. MosheFeingold Aug 2018 #20
You mind citing law in that, I don't see anything related to mixed purpose uponit7771 Aug 2018 #21
I will dig it up, but will give one better for now MosheFeingold Aug 2018 #22
So there was no duty to report the in-kind contribution because it was mixed-use? Hell, EVERYONE ... uponit7771 Aug 2018 #23
Maybe MosheFeingold Aug 2018 #24
At them minimum this goes to trial for the avg candidate and a reasonable juror would decided on uponit7771 Aug 2018 #25
The guy on Ari's show is directly addressing this issue. Not reporting a campaign benefiting ... uponit7771 Aug 2018 #8
Ah . . . Roy Rolling Aug 2018 #3
The money was to benefit the campaign and not reported regardless of its source uponit7771 Aug 2018 #4
Is it really illegal to receive a cash and in-kind donation to the campaign and not report it? Mc Mike Aug 2018 #9
+1, not only that it sounds like they KNOWINGLY hid the in-kind contribution via shell companies uponit7771 Aug 2018 #11
Did some fancy footwork with the reimbursement billing, too. Mc Mike Aug 2018 #12
LOFL !! I'd pay to see that !! uponit7771 Aug 2018 #15
Many are saying Omarosa has videotape of such. Mc Mike Aug 2018 #18
Consciousness of guilt. Mc Mike Aug 2018 #13
+++++ underpants Aug 2018 #17
Ignorance of the applicability of laws of which you are ignorant. 'Unknown unknowns'. Nt Mc Mike Aug 2018 #19
They can try but seeing as Cohen is a lawyer the prosecutor should be able to destroy them if they cstanleytech Aug 2018 #10
if you sleep noneof_theabove Aug 2018 #14
Does anyone believe there are only 2 payoffs? AC_Mem Aug 2018 #16
Unfortunately trumps ignorance isn't a free pass... beachbum bob Aug 2018 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Didn't Consult McGa...»Reply #16
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.