Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Wed Aug 10, 2016, 12:27 AM Aug 2016

Man killed by deputy in Compton not involved with carjacker [View all]

Source: Associated Press

Man killed by deputy in Compton not involved with carjacker

Amanda Lee Myers, Associated Press

Updated 10:53 pm, Tuesday, August 9, 2016

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department acknowledged Tuesday that a deputy shot and killed a black man who was mistakenly identified as a suspect in a carjacking, again bringing into question the appropriateness of a police agency's use of deadly force.

Donnell Thompson, 27, was shot at close range by a deputy riding in the turret of an armored vehicle, one of two dispatched as officers searched for suspects in Compton after a car chase and shootout. Police said the shooting occurred after Thompson ignored their commands and charged at them.

Hours before Thompson's family planned a news conference to charge that officers killed an innocent man, the department announced its investigation found "no evidence" Thompson was involved in the carjacking.

The finding provided little solace to the family, which believes the department and its officers overreacted after deputies were fired on during the chase, and that race was a factor.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Man-killed-by-LA-County-deputy-wasn-t-involved-in-9131528.php

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So no body cameras of this and we are supposed to believe he charged them? cstanleytech Aug 2016 #1
Another day, another black man shot in killed by badge wearing, state sponsored gangbangers Feeling the Bern Aug 2016 #2
So let me get this straight. The official story is that a guy, whom they Chakab Aug 2016 #3
Exactly, its just not believable. cstanleytech Aug 2016 #10
So the man "charged" an armored vehicle that looked something like this . . . Journeyman Aug 2016 #4
People do that sometimes... jtuck004 Aug 2016 #6
Yes. Some people with a reason will do that. And when there's a compassionate person in command. . . Journeyman Aug 2016 #7
Standing still is a far cry from running towards it though and if you notice the tanks drivers cstanleytech Aug 2016 #11
You seem to confuse "charging" with "standing still". LanternWaste Aug 2016 #19
THAT PHOTO.... cynzke Aug 2016 #8
... and they feared for their lives etherealtruth Aug 2016 #14
That's a vehicle designed for war, not policing, why the fuck would they ever need... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #15
The Compton police evidently believe they need two of these to go after carjackers . . . Journeyman Aug 2016 #16
That's fucking crazy, Compton isn't a warzone for fuck's sake... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #17
Actually its a pretty good vehicle for helping deal with crowd control and LA does have a cstanleytech Aug 2016 #20
How would it deal with the crowd? By sniping at them from the top mount? Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #22
Depends on what attachments they have for it but some recent developments for cstanleytech Aug 2016 #23
True, still have to wonder who they are at war with, it is still a war machine... Humanist_Activist Aug 2016 #25
sigh, technically almost everything the police have was invented for war. cstanleytech Aug 2016 #30
Why not? It worked with Michael Brown didn't it? Solomon Aug 2016 #26
Thanks for sharing a look at that critter. Had never seen one. Unbelievable. n/t Judi Lynn Aug 2016 #18
i don't believe he charged them. This is murder. patsimp Aug 2016 #5
Hey, the claim of "charging" worked well for Michael Brown's killer.... rgbecker Aug 2016 #9
Darren Wilson's claims were supported by multiple witnesses Taitertots Aug 2016 #13
Bullshit. Solomon Aug 2016 #27
Nope. Both accounts are supported by witnesses and forensic evidence Taitertots Aug 2016 #29
No reasonable person fears being "charged" by an unarmed person when they ride in an armored car Taitertots Aug 2016 #12
Second degree, to be first under California law I think it requires there to be premeditation and cstanleytech Aug 2016 #21
Since you seem to have the book on what is reasonable.... rgbecker Aug 2016 #32
And they shot him from an APV. He must have been a serious threat NWCorona Aug 2016 #24
That vehicle should be equipped with cameras True Dough Aug 2016 #28
Completely agree, there is really no good reason for it not to have cameras. nt cstanleytech Aug 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Man killed by deputy in C...