Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Loretta Lynch to accept DOJ, FBI recommendations on Clinton emails [View all]MFM008
(19,826 posts)31. Let's keep talking about it though
Like somethings going to happen.
Because
Sanders.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In other words nothing has changed since she took over as AG. Much ado about nothing.
George II
Jul 2016
#1
The intention seems to be that she wants to assure people that she will not be influenced
tk2kewl
Jul 2016
#5
I agree but it is a sad statement of the dysfunction in our government due to conflicts of interest.
JudyM
Jul 2016
#7
She is saying she's going to rubber stamp it. She also likely has a good idea of the facts and has
JudyM
Jul 2016
#11
She said she would follow their decision rather than make an independent assessment.
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#21
No, actually it's quite interesting. She had complete control over the decision to prosecute.
Bob41213
Jul 2016
#9
She said right off the bat shortly after she took over the job (maybe even during....
George II
Jul 2016
#23
I'm sure Obama doesn't want to get caught in Hillary's email problem. Why would he?
jalan48
Jul 2016
#2
NYT today: "investigators have concluded that the server was used to send classified information"
leveymg
Jul 2016
#3
Bob. No. It doesn't matter if it was set up with that intent, the only question was whether any
leveymg
Jul 2016
#29
Bob. No. The IGs of the Intelligence Community and State Dept stated just the opposite, here>
leveymg
Jul 2016
#32
If it was planned, yes it was stupid. Of course I doubt they planned it since that airport is a
cstanleytech
Jul 2016
#14
Bingo!! And the Republican voter base loves to swill up the lies and bullshit they spew.
cstanleytech
Jul 2016
#19