Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Loretta Lynch to accept DOJ, FBI recommendations on Clinton emails [View all]tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)5. The intention seems to be that she wants to assure people that she will not be influenced
By her meeting with Bill.
I'm glad she has made this statement
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In other words nothing has changed since she took over as AG. Much ado about nothing.
George II
Jul 2016
#1
The intention seems to be that she wants to assure people that she will not be influenced
tk2kewl
Jul 2016
#5
I agree but it is a sad statement of the dysfunction in our government due to conflicts of interest.
JudyM
Jul 2016
#7
She is saying she's going to rubber stamp it. She also likely has a good idea of the facts and has
JudyM
Jul 2016
#11
She said she would follow their decision rather than make an independent assessment.
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#21
No, actually it's quite interesting. She had complete control over the decision to prosecute.
Bob41213
Jul 2016
#9
She said right off the bat shortly after she took over the job (maybe even during....
George II
Jul 2016
#23
I'm sure Obama doesn't want to get caught in Hillary's email problem. Why would he?
jalan48
Jul 2016
#2
NYT today: "investigators have concluded that the server was used to send classified information"
leveymg
Jul 2016
#3
Bob. No. It doesn't matter if it was set up with that intent, the only question was whether any
leveymg
Jul 2016
#29
Bob. No. The IGs of the Intelligence Community and State Dept stated just the opposite, here>
leveymg
Jul 2016
#32
If it was planned, yes it was stupid. Of course I doubt they planned it since that airport is a
cstanleytech
Jul 2016
#14
Bingo!! And the Republican voter base loves to swill up the lies and bullshit they spew.
cstanleytech
Jul 2016
#19