Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: UN expands Argentine sovereignty over maritime area [View all]forest444
(5,902 posts)46. Sometime during the middle of one of Cameron's wet dreams.
The fact is that no elected Argentine government has, or would, do any such thing; it took a GOP-supported dictatorship to do so (and 34 years ago at that).
Argentina's budget priorities demonstrate this, moreover. They devote only 2% of their annual budget to the military (the $5 bn. security budget, minus gendarmerie and coast guard). This is barely enough for their own domestic vigilance needs and for basic payroll and maintenance. Nothing you can even begin to plan an "invasion" on.
What a world it would be if all countries had a similar policy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, it means the western half of said zone is now illegal per international laws of the sea.
forest444
Mar 2016
#3
On the sovereignty dispute perhaps - which this ruling does not impact at all.
forest444
Mar 2016
#8
Nope. Everything from Argentina to Antarctica is now Argentina's, except for the 12 mile bubble.
Xithras
Mar 2016
#9
Argentina has recognized a 160 mile exclusionary fishing zone around the Falklands
hack89
Mar 2016
#11
Nope. I copied that map straight off the UN website, right out of the approved proposal.
Xithras
Mar 2016
#22
I'm just glad they have Michelle Bachelet there, not some Pinochet grease monkey like Piņera.
forest444
Mar 2016
#29
No the British won't comply forest. Its a non-binding decision of the UN. Britain isn't going
Bacchus4.0
Mar 2016
#44