Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KTM

(1,823 posts)
17. What about it ??!??
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:05 PM
Nov 2017

Do tell, whats your issue with the source ?


"In 1976, author and historian James Weinstein founded In These Times with the mission to "identify and clarify the struggles against corporate power now multiplying in American society....

Weinstein (1926-2005) was joined in establishing this independent magazine of news, culture and opinion by noted intellectuals Daniel Ellsberg, E.P. Thompson, Noam Chomsky, Barbara Ehrenreich, Julian Bond and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom were among the original sponsors of the magazine (see full list of founding sponsors below).

In These Times has frequently scooped the mainstream media on stories ranging from the first coverage of global warming and extensive investigative reporting on the Iran Contra scandal in the '80s to early in-depth coverage of the genocide in the Sudan in 2004. Such reporting has earned In These Times more Project Censored awards than any other magazine.

Over the last 28 years, In These Times has distinguished itself by producing high-quality journalism that treats women, communities of color, working people and other groups ignored by the mainstream media as legitimate audiences, sources and subjects for the news.

The late Sen. Paul Wellstone, one of the first subscribers to In These Times, put it this way: "Meaningful democracy cannot survive without the free flow of information, even (or especially) when that information threatens the privileged and the powerful. At a time of growing media concentration, In These Times is an invaluable source of news and information that the corporate media would too often prefer to ignore."


Oooooooh.... sounds suspicious !
Is this a new meme? I feel like I missed the memo! Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #1
Here I thought Democrats swept VA. NJ. WA. sheshe2 Nov 2017 #20
Yeah. Does that mean we're the underdog now? ehrnst Nov 2017 #58
Lol sheshe2 Nov 2017 #59
Both of these winning candidates are actually Democrats who ran as Democrats lapucelle Nov 2017 #32
Exactly, they won as Democrats on Democratic policies. Some want to redefine "Democrats" and.... George II Nov 2017 #48
This This This sheshe2 Nov 2017 #60
I don't get how progressive and socialist became Progressive dog Nov 2017 #2
There are socialist and non-socialist progressives. David__77 Nov 2017 #7
So what. Progressive dog Nov 2017 #12
Theyre not synonymous. David__77 Nov 2017 #13
I replied to a post that implied they were synonyms. Progressive dog Nov 2017 #14
It didn't help that many of these "socialists" were shitting on "corporate" Northam Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #3
Did they endorse the Democratic nominee in 2016? Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #5
Some did, some didn't... Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #8
The DSA. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #10
No. They didnt endorse the Democratic nominee. lapucelle Nov 2017 #54
Some socialists voted for the Democratic candidate and some did not. David__77 Nov 2017 #9
How about the DSA? Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #11
Those who did not are REPUBLICANS PERIOD... I vote for the person with a 'D' next to his/her name. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #25
Excellent point - but Northam won, so now (in some minds) he's "ours". George II Nov 2017 #49
I perused the article and found nothing outstanding that the Democratic Leadership and base does not SandyZ Nov 2017 #4
. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #6
Hmmm, about that source? Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #15
What about it ??!?? KTM Nov 2017 #17
I guess when it comes to DEMS they are just not feeling it! Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #18
Spell it out.... KTM Nov 2017 #19
Yes, in the past they have attacked Democrats and the party. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #26
Links please Omaha Steve Nov 2017 #55
It is right on your link... Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #64
Zack Exley is a former senior advisor with the Bernie Sanders campaign Omaha Steve Nov 2017 #66
Candidates who don't embrace the (D) after their name and the Democratic Platform... Hekate Nov 2017 #16
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ sheshe2 Nov 2017 #61
You'd have an argument if any of them were Socialists... brooklynite Nov 2017 #21
We have public water and electric power Omaha Steve Nov 2017 #23
You have screwed women with abortion bills from hell which Mello helped to pass...some progressive. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #27
Obama got an electoral vote in 08 from Omaha....look it up Omaha Steve Nov 2017 #31
one vote? It is still a deep red state...hasn't gone Dem since 1964. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #52
We only have 5 votes as a State Omaha Steve Nov 2017 #53
. sheshe2 Nov 2017 #22
Stop this nonsense. Blue_true Nov 2017 #24
Oh, "Democrats' won across the state ...there fixed it. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #28
In a local Democratic Party Meeting Sunday JustAnotherGen Nov 2017 #29
I'll concede the headline is hyperbolic GaryCnf Nov 2017 #30
You are right that the headline is hyperbolic, but your post exaggerates even more. FSogol Nov 2017 #38
Are you including GaryCnf Nov 2017 #41
The black community turned out big for Northam. Northam with Fairfax toured the entire state. FSogol Nov 2017 #44
Because we always do GaryCnf Nov 2017 #47
#fakenews. stonecutter357 Nov 2017 #33
. ismnotwasm Nov 2017 #34
Go ahead, enlighten Northam Pugster Nov 2017 #35
Great post, Omaha Steve. kcr Nov 2017 #36
LOL NurseJackie Nov 2017 #37
The fact is that last Tuesday GaryCnf Nov 2017 #39
You are the only one saying the Northam campaign said "we don't need you" to anyone. FSogol Nov 2017 #40
Repeating the same centrist talking ponts doesn't make them true. n/t GaryCnf Nov 2017 #42
Labeling everyone who disagrees with you a centrist doesn't make it true. FSogol Nov 2017 #45
Conceded GaryCnf Nov 2017 #51
Eye opening that people don't even know what a socialist is. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #43
No, NOT a "Democratic socialist", as though that's a new party, but a Democrat who also is... George II Nov 2017 #46
JPR angst. ismnotwasm Nov 2017 #50
;) sheshe2 Nov 2017 #62
Why not mention the "fool on the hill" group while your at it Omaha Steve Nov 2017 #63
And then there's Alabama lame54 Nov 2017 #56
Democrats showed how to win last week mcar Nov 2017 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Socialists Just Showed th...»Reply #17